胸部超声检测胸腔手术后肺部并发症:一项比较研究

Ali Zein Elabdein, Ramy Abdelrheim Hassan, Mahmoud Khairy Elhaish, Hussein Elkhayat
{"title":"胸部超声检测胸腔手术后肺部并发症:一项比较研究","authors":"Ali Zein Elabdein, Ramy Abdelrheim Hassan, Mahmoud Khairy Elhaish, Hussein Elkhayat","doi":"10.1186/s43057-024-00124-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patients who underwent thoracic surgery procedures were usually subjected to daily chest X-rays until discharge, exposing patients to ionizing radiation and requiring patient movement with chest drains, difficult positioning, and time-consuming. Unlike chest ultrasound, which is a good alternative because it is bedside and accurate in the detection of pulmonary complications. We hypothesize that a thoracic surgery resident with a short training program in chest ultrasound can achieve comparable results to a chest X-ray. Our study aims to analyze the agreement between the two techniques. This is an observational prospective study. Eighty-six adult patients who underwent thoracic surgery were included. Every patient had a chest X-ray and chest ultrasound follow-up on day 0, day 3, and day 5 post-operative. Chest ultrasound examinations were performed by the same resident, and the results were revised by an expert sonographer for the detection of pneumothorax, pleural effusion, pulmonary consolidation, and interstitial pattern. Both diagnostic procedures showed substantial agreement for pneumothorax (K = 0.661). For pleural effusion, they showed moderate agreement (K = 0.448, P < 0.001), and no cases developed an interstitial pattern. Overall, both diagnostic procedures showed perfect agreement (K = 0.838, P < 0.001). The time lag to perform a chest ultrasound was statistically lower than that to perform. chest X-ray, with a median of 7 min versus 80 min, respectively. Performing chest ultrasound by a thoracic surgery resident is a less time-consuming and easy bedside diagnostic tool. Compared chest ultrasound to the postoperative X-ray showed a perfect diagnostic agreement for pulmonary consolidation and moderate agreement for pleural effusion and pneumothorax. NCT04118621","PeriodicalId":501458,"journal":{"name":"The Cardiothoracic Surgeon","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chest ultrasound to detect postoperative pulmonary complications after thoracic surgery: a comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Ali Zein Elabdein, Ramy Abdelrheim Hassan, Mahmoud Khairy Elhaish, Hussein Elkhayat\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43057-024-00124-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Patients who underwent thoracic surgery procedures were usually subjected to daily chest X-rays until discharge, exposing patients to ionizing radiation and requiring patient movement with chest drains, difficult positioning, and time-consuming. Unlike chest ultrasound, which is a good alternative because it is bedside and accurate in the detection of pulmonary complications. We hypothesize that a thoracic surgery resident with a short training program in chest ultrasound can achieve comparable results to a chest X-ray. Our study aims to analyze the agreement between the two techniques. This is an observational prospective study. Eighty-six adult patients who underwent thoracic surgery were included. Every patient had a chest X-ray and chest ultrasound follow-up on day 0, day 3, and day 5 post-operative. Chest ultrasound examinations were performed by the same resident, and the results were revised by an expert sonographer for the detection of pneumothorax, pleural effusion, pulmonary consolidation, and interstitial pattern. Both diagnostic procedures showed substantial agreement for pneumothorax (K = 0.661). For pleural effusion, they showed moderate agreement (K = 0.448, P < 0.001), and no cases developed an interstitial pattern. Overall, both diagnostic procedures showed perfect agreement (K = 0.838, P < 0.001). The time lag to perform a chest ultrasound was statistically lower than that to perform. chest X-ray, with a median of 7 min versus 80 min, respectively. Performing chest ultrasound by a thoracic surgery resident is a less time-consuming and easy bedside diagnostic tool. Compared chest ultrasound to the postoperative X-ray showed a perfect diagnostic agreement for pulmonary consolidation and moderate agreement for pleural effusion and pneumothorax. NCT04118621\",\"PeriodicalId\":501458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Cardiothoracic Surgeon\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Cardiothoracic Surgeon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43057-024-00124-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cardiothoracic Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43057-024-00124-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

接受胸外科手术的患者通常每天都要接受胸部 X 光检查,直到出院,这不仅会使患者受到电离辐射,还需要用胸腔引流管移动患者,定位困难且耗时。与之不同的是,胸部超声是一种很好的替代方法,因为它可以在床边准确检测肺部并发症。我们假设,胸外科住院医师经过短期的胸部超声培训后,可以达到与胸部 X 光检查相当的效果。我们的研究旨在分析两种技术之间的一致性。这是一项前瞻性观察研究。研究纳入了 86 名接受胸部手术的成年患者。每位患者都在术后第 0 天、第 3 天和第 5 天接受了胸部 X 光和胸部超声波随访。胸部超声波检查由同一名住院医师进行,并由一名超声波专家对检查结果进行修正,以检测气胸、胸腔积液、肺部合并症和间质形态。在气胸方面,两种诊断程序显示出很大的一致性(K = 0.661)。在胸腔积液方面,两者显示出中等程度的一致性(K = 0.448,P < 0.001),没有病例出现肺间质形态。总体而言,两种诊断程序完全一致(K = 0.838,P < 0.001)。据统计,进行胸部超声检查的时间滞后比进行胸部 X 光检查的时间滞后要短,中位数分别为 7 分钟和 80 分钟。由胸外科住院医师进行胸部超声检查是一种耗时较少且简便的床旁诊断工具。胸部超声与术后 X 光片的比较显示,两者对肺部合并症的诊断结果完全一致,对胸腔积液和气胸的诊断结果也基本一致。NCT04118621
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chest ultrasound to detect postoperative pulmonary complications after thoracic surgery: a comparative study
Patients who underwent thoracic surgery procedures were usually subjected to daily chest X-rays until discharge, exposing patients to ionizing radiation and requiring patient movement with chest drains, difficult positioning, and time-consuming. Unlike chest ultrasound, which is a good alternative because it is bedside and accurate in the detection of pulmonary complications. We hypothesize that a thoracic surgery resident with a short training program in chest ultrasound can achieve comparable results to a chest X-ray. Our study aims to analyze the agreement between the two techniques. This is an observational prospective study. Eighty-six adult patients who underwent thoracic surgery were included. Every patient had a chest X-ray and chest ultrasound follow-up on day 0, day 3, and day 5 post-operative. Chest ultrasound examinations were performed by the same resident, and the results were revised by an expert sonographer for the detection of pneumothorax, pleural effusion, pulmonary consolidation, and interstitial pattern. Both diagnostic procedures showed substantial agreement for pneumothorax (K = 0.661). For pleural effusion, they showed moderate agreement (K = 0.448, P < 0.001), and no cases developed an interstitial pattern. Overall, both diagnostic procedures showed perfect agreement (K = 0.838, P < 0.001). The time lag to perform a chest ultrasound was statistically lower than that to perform. chest X-ray, with a median of 7 min versus 80 min, respectively. Performing chest ultrasound by a thoracic surgery resident is a less time-consuming and easy bedside diagnostic tool. Compared chest ultrasound to the postoperative X-ray showed a perfect diagnostic agreement for pulmonary consolidation and moderate agreement for pleural effusion and pneumothorax. NCT04118621
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction: Mechanical mitral valve endurance in children under 2 years A novel approach, AngioVac use in right-sided infective endocarditis: a scoping review The current state of minimally invasive cardiac surgery in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis Sixteen-year outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery: a single-center experience Subclinical venous thromboembolism after pulmonary resection for lung cancer: an observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1