罗德岛州社会弱势指数与乳腺癌、宫颈癌和大肠癌筛查率之间的关系

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Cancer Causes & Control Pub Date : 2024-04-13 DOI:10.1007/s10552-024-01872-6
Jihwan Hwang, Patricia Markham Risica, Eric Lamy, William Goedel
{"title":"罗德岛州社会弱势指数与乳腺癌、宫颈癌和大肠癌筛查率之间的关系","authors":"Jihwan Hwang, Patricia Markham Risica, Eric Lamy, William Goedel","doi":"10.1007/s10552-024-01872-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Cancer screening is effective in reducing the burden of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers, but not all communities have appropriate access to these services. In this study, we aimed to identify under-resourced communities by assessing the association between the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) with screening rates for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers in ZIP-code tabulation areas (ZCTAs) in Rhode Island.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This study leveraged deidentified health insurance claims data from HealthFacts RI, the state’s all-payer claims database, to calculate screening rates for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers using Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set measures. We used spatial autoregressive Tobit models to assess the association between the SVI, its four domains, and its 15 component variables with screening rates in 2019, accounting for spatial dependencies.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>In 2019, 73.2, 65.0, and 66.1% of eligible individuals were screened for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer, respectively. For every 1-unit increase in the SVI, screening rates for breast and colorectal cancer were lower by 0.07% (95% CI 0.01–0.08%) and 0.08% (95% CI 0.02–0.15%), respectively. With higher scores on the SVI’s socioeconomic domain, screening rates for all three types of cancers were lower.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The SVI, especially its socioeconomic domain, is a useful tool for identifying areas that are under-served by current efforts to expand access to screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer. These areas should be prioritized for new place-based partnerships that address barriers to screening at the individual and community level.</p>","PeriodicalId":9432,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Causes & Control","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between the social vulnerability index and breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening rates in Rhode Island\",\"authors\":\"Jihwan Hwang, Patricia Markham Risica, Eric Lamy, William Goedel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10552-024-01872-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>Cancer screening is effective in reducing the burden of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers, but not all communities have appropriate access to these services. In this study, we aimed to identify under-resourced communities by assessing the association between the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) with screening rates for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers in ZIP-code tabulation areas (ZCTAs) in Rhode Island.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>This study leveraged deidentified health insurance claims data from HealthFacts RI, the state’s all-payer claims database, to calculate screening rates for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers using Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set measures. We used spatial autoregressive Tobit models to assess the association between the SVI, its four domains, and its 15 component variables with screening rates in 2019, accounting for spatial dependencies.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>In 2019, 73.2, 65.0, and 66.1% of eligible individuals were screened for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer, respectively. For every 1-unit increase in the SVI, screening rates for breast and colorectal cancer were lower by 0.07% (95% CI 0.01–0.08%) and 0.08% (95% CI 0.02–0.15%), respectively. With higher scores on the SVI’s socioeconomic domain, screening rates for all three types of cancers were lower.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>The SVI, especially its socioeconomic domain, is a useful tool for identifying areas that are under-served by current efforts to expand access to screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer. These areas should be prioritized for new place-based partnerships that address barriers to screening at the individual and community level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Causes & Control\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Causes & Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-024-01872-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Causes & Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-024-01872-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景癌症筛查能有效减轻乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌的负担,但并非所有社区都能适当获得这些服务。在本研究中,我们旨在通过评估罗德岛州邮政编码表区(ZCTA)的社会脆弱性指数(SVI)与乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查率之间的关联,来确定资源不足的社区。方法本研究利用该州所有纳税人索赔数据库 HealthFacts RI 中的去身份化医疗保险索赔数据,使用医疗保健有效性数据和信息集(Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set)计算乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌的筛查率。我们使用空间自回归 Tobit 模型来评估 SVI、其四个领域及其 15 个组成变量与 2019 年筛查率之间的关联,并考虑了空间依赖性。结果在 2019 年,分别有 73.2%、65.0% 和 66.1% 的符合条件者接受了乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查。SVI 每增加 1 个单位,乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查率分别降低 0.07%(95% CI 0.01-0.08%)和 0.08%(95% CI 0.02-0.15%)。结论SVI,尤其是其社会经济领域,是一种有用的工具,可用于确定目前努力扩大乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查范围但服务不足的地区。这些地区应优先考虑建立新的地方合作关系,以解决个人和社区层面的筛查障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association between the social vulnerability index and breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening rates in Rhode Island

Background

Cancer screening is effective in reducing the burden of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers, but not all communities have appropriate access to these services. In this study, we aimed to identify under-resourced communities by assessing the association between the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) with screening rates for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers in ZIP-code tabulation areas (ZCTAs) in Rhode Island.

Methods

This study leveraged deidentified health insurance claims data from HealthFacts RI, the state’s all-payer claims database, to calculate screening rates for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers using Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set measures. We used spatial autoregressive Tobit models to assess the association between the SVI, its four domains, and its 15 component variables with screening rates in 2019, accounting for spatial dependencies.

Results

In 2019, 73.2, 65.0, and 66.1% of eligible individuals were screened for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer, respectively. For every 1-unit increase in the SVI, screening rates for breast and colorectal cancer were lower by 0.07% (95% CI 0.01–0.08%) and 0.08% (95% CI 0.02–0.15%), respectively. With higher scores on the SVI’s socioeconomic domain, screening rates for all three types of cancers were lower.

Conclusion

The SVI, especially its socioeconomic domain, is a useful tool for identifying areas that are under-served by current efforts to expand access to screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer. These areas should be prioritized for new place-based partnerships that address barriers to screening at the individual and community level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Causes & Control
Cancer Causes & Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Causes & Control is an international refereed journal that both reports and stimulates new avenues of investigation into the causes, control, and subsequent prevention of cancer. By drawing together related information published currently in a diverse range of biological and medical journals, it has a multidisciplinary and multinational approach. The scope of the journal includes: variation in cancer distribution within and between populations; factors associated with cancer risk; preventive and therapeutic interventions on a population scale; economic, demographic, and health-policy implications of cancer; and related methodological issues. The emphasis is on speed of publication. The journal will normally publish within 30 to 60 days of acceptance of manuscripts. Cancer Causes & Control publishes Original Articles, Reviews, Commentaries, Opinions, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor which will have direct relevance to researchers and practitioners working in epidemiology, medical statistics, cancer biology, health education, medical economics and related fields. The journal also contains significant information for government agencies concerned with cancer research, control and policy.
期刊最新文献
Indigenous access to clinical services along the lung cancer treatment pathway: a review of current evidence. Trends in pancreatic cancer mortality in the United States 1999-2020: a CDC database population-based study. Body mass index and the prevalence of high-risk colorectal adenomas in a population undergoing screening colonoscopy in Alberta, Canada. Is there an association between mastitis and breast cancer? a retrospective cohort study from Germany. Prostate-specific antigen testing patterns and prostate cancer stage at diagnosis in older Ohio cancer patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1