{"title":"1953 年和 1969 年灵活汇率的案例:弗里德曼与约翰逊","authors":"George S. Tavlas","doi":"10.1111/jmcb.13151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the years of the Bretton Woods system, Milton Friedman and Harry Johnson, respectively, authored two of the most influential articles on exchange-rate systems. Friedman's article, “The Case for Flexible Exchange Rates,” was published in 1953. Johnson's article, published 16 years later, carried the almost identical title—“The Case for Flexible Exchange Rates, 1969.” While both articles achieved classic status in the 1970s and the 1980s, Johnson's essay appears to have surpassed Friedman's essay in stature in the view of some economists. This paper provides a comparison of the arguments in favor of flexible rates and against fixed rates presented by Friedman and Johnson. I conclude that Friedman's essay presaged all of the major arguments made in Johnson's essay while excluding several major misses made by Johnson. Nevertheless, there were pragmatic reasons why Johnson's essay became more influential.","PeriodicalId":48328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Money Credit and Banking","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Case for Flexible Exchange Rates in 1953 and 1969: Friedman versus Johnson\",\"authors\":\"George S. Tavlas\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jmcb.13151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the years of the Bretton Woods system, Milton Friedman and Harry Johnson, respectively, authored two of the most influential articles on exchange-rate systems. Friedman's article, “The Case for Flexible Exchange Rates,” was published in 1953. Johnson's article, published 16 years later, carried the almost identical title—“The Case for Flexible Exchange Rates, 1969.” While both articles achieved classic status in the 1970s and the 1980s, Johnson's essay appears to have surpassed Friedman's essay in stature in the view of some economists. This paper provides a comparison of the arguments in favor of flexible rates and against fixed rates presented by Friedman and Johnson. I conclude that Friedman's essay presaged all of the major arguments made in Johnson's essay while excluding several major misses made by Johnson. Nevertheless, there were pragmatic reasons why Johnson's essay became more influential.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Money Credit and Banking\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Money Credit and Banking\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.13151\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Money Credit and Banking","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.13151","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在布雷顿森林体系时期,米尔顿-弗里德曼和哈里-约翰逊分别撰写了两篇关于汇率制度的最有影响力的文章。弗里德曼的文章《灵活汇率的案例》发表于 1953 年。约翰逊的文章在 16 年后发表,标题几乎相同--"The Case for Flexible Exchange Rates, 1969"。虽然两篇文章都在 20 世纪 70 年代和 80 年代获得了经典地位,但在一些经济学家看来,约翰逊的文章似乎在地位上超过了弗里德曼的文章。本文对弗里德曼和约翰逊提出的支持灵活利率和反对固定利率的论点进行了比较。我的结论是,弗里德曼的文章预示了约翰逊文章中提出的所有主要论点,同时也排除了约翰逊的几个主要失误。不过,约翰逊的文章之所以更具影响力,还是有其实际原因的。
The Case for Flexible Exchange Rates in 1953 and 1969: Friedman versus Johnson
During the years of the Bretton Woods system, Milton Friedman and Harry Johnson, respectively, authored two of the most influential articles on exchange-rate systems. Friedman's article, “The Case for Flexible Exchange Rates,” was published in 1953. Johnson's article, published 16 years later, carried the almost identical title—“The Case for Flexible Exchange Rates, 1969.” While both articles achieved classic status in the 1970s and the 1980s, Johnson's essay appears to have surpassed Friedman's essay in stature in the view of some economists. This paper provides a comparison of the arguments in favor of flexible rates and against fixed rates presented by Friedman and Johnson. I conclude that Friedman's essay presaged all of the major arguments made in Johnson's essay while excluding several major misses made by Johnson. Nevertheless, there were pragmatic reasons why Johnson's essay became more influential.