移动捐赠的差距:智能手机对捐赠行为的负面影响

IF 4 2区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Consumer Psychology Pub Date : 2024-03-25 DOI:10.1002/jcpy.1418
Stefan J. Hock, Kristen A. Ferguson, Kelly B. Herd
{"title":"移动捐赠的差距:智能手机对捐赠行为的负面影响","authors":"Stefan J. Hock, Kristen A. Ferguson, Kelly B. Herd","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While charities typically use the same messaging when appealing to consumers on their smartphones and PCs, this approach may backfire. Across three studies, we find consumers are less likely to donate on their smartphones (vs. PCs), a phenomenon we call the <i>mobile giving gap</i>. In study 1, we demonstrate that consumers are less willing to donate real money to a charitable organization. In study 2, we provide process support and demonstrate that the focal effect is mediated by other-focus. Finally, a field experiment using Google display ads (study 3) replicates the focal effect and demonstrates that the negative impact of smartphones is attenuated when the appeal explicitly focuses on others (vs. the self). This study not only provides additional process support, but also suggests an easily implementable strategy that charities can use to close the <i>mobile giving gap</i>. Taken together, our findings offer theoretical insights related to the mobile mindset and its impact on consumer behavior and highlight that charities should tailor their donation appeals based on device type.","PeriodicalId":48365,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","volume":"300 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The mobile giving gap: The negative impact of smartphones on donation behavior\",\"authors\":\"Stefan J. Hock, Kristen A. Ferguson, Kelly B. Herd\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcpy.1418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While charities typically use the same messaging when appealing to consumers on their smartphones and PCs, this approach may backfire. Across three studies, we find consumers are less likely to donate on their smartphones (vs. PCs), a phenomenon we call the <i>mobile giving gap</i>. In study 1, we demonstrate that consumers are less willing to donate real money to a charitable organization. In study 2, we provide process support and demonstrate that the focal effect is mediated by other-focus. Finally, a field experiment using Google display ads (study 3) replicates the focal effect and demonstrates that the negative impact of smartphones is attenuated when the appeal explicitly focuses on others (vs. the self). This study not only provides additional process support, but also suggests an easily implementable strategy that charities can use to close the <i>mobile giving gap</i>. Taken together, our findings offer theoretical insights related to the mobile mindset and its impact on consumer behavior and highlight that charities should tailor their donation appeals based on device type.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Consumer Psychology\",\"volume\":\"300 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Consumer Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1418\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1418","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然慈善机构在吸引智能手机和个人电脑上的消费者时通常使用相同的信息,但这种方法可能会适得其反。通过三项研究,我们发现消费者使用智能手机(与 PC 相比)进行捐赠的可能性较低,我们将这种现象称为移动捐赠差距。在研究 1 中,我们证明消费者不太愿意向慈善机构捐赠真金白银。在研究 2 中,我们提供了过程支持,并证明焦点效应是由其他焦点中介的。最后,使用谷歌显示广告进行的实地实验(研究 3)复制了焦点效应,并证明当呼吁明确聚焦于他人(而非自我)时,智能手机的负面影响会减弱。这项研究不仅提供了更多的过程支持,还提出了一种易于实施的策略,慈善机构可以利用它来缩小移动捐赠的差距。综上所述,我们的研究结果提供了有关移动心态及其对消费者行为影响的理论见解,并强调了慈善机构应根据设备类型调整其捐赠呼吁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The mobile giving gap: The negative impact of smartphones on donation behavior
While charities typically use the same messaging when appealing to consumers on their smartphones and PCs, this approach may backfire. Across three studies, we find consumers are less likely to donate on their smartphones (vs. PCs), a phenomenon we call the mobile giving gap. In study 1, we demonstrate that consumers are less willing to donate real money to a charitable organization. In study 2, we provide process support and demonstrate that the focal effect is mediated by other-focus. Finally, a field experiment using Google display ads (study 3) replicates the focal effect and demonstrates that the negative impact of smartphones is attenuated when the appeal explicitly focuses on others (vs. the self). This study not only provides additional process support, but also suggests an easily implementable strategy that charities can use to close the mobile giving gap. Taken together, our findings offer theoretical insights related to the mobile mindset and its impact on consumer behavior and highlight that charities should tailor their donation appeals based on device type.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Journal of Consumer Psychology is devoted to psychological perspectives on the study of the consumer. It publishes articles that contribute both theoretically and empirically to an understanding of psychological processes underlying consumers thoughts, feelings, decisions, and behaviors. Areas of emphasis include, but are not limited to, consumer judgment and decision processes, attitude formation and change, reactions to persuasive communications, affective experiences, consumer information processing, consumer-brand relationships, affective, cognitive, and motivational determinants of consumer behavior, family and group decision processes, and cultural and individual differences in consumer behavior.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Refining and expanding applications of Moral Foundations Theory in consumer psychology Message framing to enhance consumer compliance with disease detection communication for prevention: The moderating role of age AI‐induced dehumanization The model‐sizing dilemma: The use of varied female model sizes helps the impressions of brand values but hurts shopping ease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1