{"title":"巨型蜜蜂的分类修订和识别钥匙","authors":"Nyaton Kitnya, Axel Brockmann, Gard W Otis","doi":"10.1101/2024.04.03.587895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The taxonomy and phylogeny of the giant honey bees (Apis; subgenus Megapis) are still controversial and unresolved. The species boundaries within the subgenus are unclear and some species that are recognized on the basis of genetic differences lack supporting morphological characters. Two species are now well accepted: Apis dorsata F. of tropical regions of Asia and Apis laboriosa Smith that inhabits the foothills of Himalaya and neighboring mountain ranges. In addition, researchers have suggested that the two allopatric populations of giant honey bees that inhabit Sulawesi, Indonesia (A. binghami Cockerell) and the oceanic Philippine islands (A. breviligula Maa) as well as the South Indian form also deserve species status. We conducted a taxonomic study based on morphological characters of Megapis from throughout Asia. Our study confirms that Apis laboriosa is a distinct species based on numerous morphological characters. Moreover, A. dorsata of mainland Asia differs from the two island taxa based on coloration, ocellus size, and the spacing of compound eyes and ocelli. We found no evidence that breviligula of the Philippines has a distinctively short tongue, and report only one minor character (the shape of sternum 5) that differed statistically between bees from Sulawesi and the Philippines. We conclude that the bees from these islands represent a single morphological species, A. binghami, with two subspecies, A. b. binghami and A. b. breviligula. Apis dorsata from the Andaman Islands are smaller than but conspecific with those of mainland Asia. We found no morphological autapomorphies in the giant honey bees of southern India known to differ in mtDNA from A. dorsata from elsewhere in mainland Asia. We provide a taxonomic keys to workers and drones within the subgenus Megapis.","PeriodicalId":501575,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Zoology","volume":"300 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taxonomic Revision and Identification Keys for the Giant Honey Bees\",\"authors\":\"Nyaton Kitnya, Axel Brockmann, Gard W Otis\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.04.03.587895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The taxonomy and phylogeny of the giant honey bees (Apis; subgenus Megapis) are still controversial and unresolved. The species boundaries within the subgenus are unclear and some species that are recognized on the basis of genetic differences lack supporting morphological characters. Two species are now well accepted: Apis dorsata F. of tropical regions of Asia and Apis laboriosa Smith that inhabits the foothills of Himalaya and neighboring mountain ranges. In addition, researchers have suggested that the two allopatric populations of giant honey bees that inhabit Sulawesi, Indonesia (A. binghami Cockerell) and the oceanic Philippine islands (A. breviligula Maa) as well as the South Indian form also deserve species status. We conducted a taxonomic study based on morphological characters of Megapis from throughout Asia. Our study confirms that Apis laboriosa is a distinct species based on numerous morphological characters. Moreover, A. dorsata of mainland Asia differs from the two island taxa based on coloration, ocellus size, and the spacing of compound eyes and ocelli. We found no evidence that breviligula of the Philippines has a distinctively short tongue, and report only one minor character (the shape of sternum 5) that differed statistically between bees from Sulawesi and the Philippines. We conclude that the bees from these islands represent a single morphological species, A. binghami, with two subspecies, A. b. binghami and A. b. breviligula. Apis dorsata from the Andaman Islands are smaller than but conspecific with those of mainland Asia. We found no morphological autapomorphies in the giant honey bees of southern India known to differ in mtDNA from A. dorsata from elsewhere in mainland Asia. We provide a taxonomic keys to workers and drones within the subgenus Megapis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"bioRxiv - Zoology\",\"volume\":\"300 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"bioRxiv - Zoology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.03.587895\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.03.587895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
大蜜蜂(Apis;Megapis亚属)的分类和系统发育仍存在争议,尚未解决。亚属中的物种界限并不明确,一些根据遗传差异而被确认的物种缺乏形态特征的支持。目前有两个物种已被广泛接受:亚洲热带地区的 Apis dorsata F.和栖息于喜马拉雅山麓及邻近山脉的 Apis laboriosa Smith。此外,研究人员还认为,栖息在印度尼西亚苏拉威西岛(A. binghami Cockerell)和菲律宾大洋岛屿(A. breviligula Maa)的两个异地巨型蜜蜂种群以及南印度形式的巨型蜜蜂也应获得物种地位。我们根据亚洲各地 Megapis 的形态特征进行了分类研究。我们的研究证实,根据大量形态特征,劳蜂(Apis laboriosa)是一个独特的种。此外,亚洲大陆的A. dorsata与两个岛屿类群在颜色、眼孔大小、复眼和眼轮间距等方面存在差异。我们没有发现菲律宾的breviligula具有独特短舌的证据,并且只报告了一个次要特征(胸骨5的形状)在统计上与苏拉威西岛和菲律宾的蜜蜂不同。我们的结论是,这些岛屿上的蜜蜂代表了一个单一的形态学种 A. binghami,以及两个亚种 A. b. binghami 和 A. b. breviligula。安达曼群岛的背蜂比亚洲大陆的背蜂小,但与亚洲大陆的背蜂同种。我们在印度南部的巨型蜜蜂中没有发现形态学上的自同形现象,已知它们的 mtDNA 与亚洲大陆其他地方的背袋蜂(A. dorsata)不同。我们为 Megapis 亚属中的工蜂和雄蜂提供了分类钥匙。
Taxonomic Revision and Identification Keys for the Giant Honey Bees
The taxonomy and phylogeny of the giant honey bees (Apis; subgenus Megapis) are still controversial and unresolved. The species boundaries within the subgenus are unclear and some species that are recognized on the basis of genetic differences lack supporting morphological characters. Two species are now well accepted: Apis dorsata F. of tropical regions of Asia and Apis laboriosa Smith that inhabits the foothills of Himalaya and neighboring mountain ranges. In addition, researchers have suggested that the two allopatric populations of giant honey bees that inhabit Sulawesi, Indonesia (A. binghami Cockerell) and the oceanic Philippine islands (A. breviligula Maa) as well as the South Indian form also deserve species status. We conducted a taxonomic study based on morphological characters of Megapis from throughout Asia. Our study confirms that Apis laboriosa is a distinct species based on numerous morphological characters. Moreover, A. dorsata of mainland Asia differs from the two island taxa based on coloration, ocellus size, and the spacing of compound eyes and ocelli. We found no evidence that breviligula of the Philippines has a distinctively short tongue, and report only one minor character (the shape of sternum 5) that differed statistically between bees from Sulawesi and the Philippines. We conclude that the bees from these islands represent a single morphological species, A. binghami, with two subspecies, A. b. binghami and A. b. breviligula. Apis dorsata from the Andaman Islands are smaller than but conspecific with those of mainland Asia. We found no morphological autapomorphies in the giant honey bees of southern India known to differ in mtDNA from A. dorsata from elsewhere in mainland Asia. We provide a taxonomic keys to workers and drones within the subgenus Megapis.