现存腕足动物下颌骨骨骺的解剖:分类与变异

Laurent Pallas, Masato Nakatsukasa, Yutaka Kunimatsu
{"title":"现存腕足动物下颌骨骨骺的解剖:分类与变异","authors":"Laurent Pallas, Masato Nakatsukasa, Yutaka Kunimatsu","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.31.587451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The symphyseal anatomy of extant and fossil cercopithecids has not yet been demonstrated as a useful tool for taxonomic discrimination, and the source of variation in cercopithecid symphysis has not been addressed on a broad taxonomic scale. Here, we used linear and angular dimensions to quantify symphysis shape. Using univariate, multivariate data and allometric regressions (partial least squares and phylogenetic generalized least square regressions), we addressed the hypothesis that extant cercopithecids can be distinguished by symphysis shape. Significant differences in univariate and multivariate data and allometric regressions permitted to distinguish cercopithecids at the subfamilial, tribal, and genus levels. We showed that multivariate data followed the distribution expected under Brownian Motion and significantly discriminates taxa at different taxonomic levels. Colobine symphysis are characterized by developed inferior transverse tori, short planum alveolare, and short symphysis, whereas cercopithecine symphysis are characterized by developed superior transverse tori, long planum alveolare, and long symphysis. Exceptions to this pattern exist within each subfamily, and this study underlines the particular anatomy of <em>Colobus</em> and <em>Presbytis</em> among the colobines, <em>Allenopithecus</em> among the Cercopithecini, and <em>Theropithecus</em> and <em>Lophocebus</em> among the Papionini. We also demonstrate that the relative development of the transverse tori, the relative length of the planum alveolare and symphyseal inclination are dimorphic traits. Specifically, we show that the symphysis of <em>Procolobus verus</em>, <em>Nasalis larvatus</em>, and <em>Papio anubis</em> is strongly dimorphic.","PeriodicalId":501575,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Zoology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anatomy of the mandibular symphysis of extant cercopithecids: taxonomy and variation\",\"authors\":\"Laurent Pallas, Masato Nakatsukasa, Yutaka Kunimatsu\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.03.31.587451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The symphyseal anatomy of extant and fossil cercopithecids has not yet been demonstrated as a useful tool for taxonomic discrimination, and the source of variation in cercopithecid symphysis has not been addressed on a broad taxonomic scale. Here, we used linear and angular dimensions to quantify symphysis shape. Using univariate, multivariate data and allometric regressions (partial least squares and phylogenetic generalized least square regressions), we addressed the hypothesis that extant cercopithecids can be distinguished by symphysis shape. Significant differences in univariate and multivariate data and allometric regressions permitted to distinguish cercopithecids at the subfamilial, tribal, and genus levels. We showed that multivariate data followed the distribution expected under Brownian Motion and significantly discriminates taxa at different taxonomic levels. Colobine symphysis are characterized by developed inferior transverse tori, short planum alveolare, and short symphysis, whereas cercopithecine symphysis are characterized by developed superior transverse tori, long planum alveolare, and long symphysis. Exceptions to this pattern exist within each subfamily, and this study underlines the particular anatomy of <em>Colobus</em> and <em>Presbytis</em> among the colobines, <em>Allenopithecus</em> among the Cercopithecini, and <em>Theropithecus</em> and <em>Lophocebus</em> among the Papionini. We also demonstrate that the relative development of the transverse tori, the relative length of the planum alveolare and symphyseal inclination are dimorphic traits. Specifically, we show that the symphysis of <em>Procolobus verus</em>, <em>Nasalis larvatus</em>, and <em>Papio anubis</em> is strongly dimorphic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"bioRxiv - Zoology\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"bioRxiv - Zoology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.31.587451\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.31.587451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现生和化石腕足动物的骨骺解剖尚未被证明是分类鉴别的有用工具,腕足动物骨骺的变异来源也尚未在广泛的分类范围内得到解决。在这里,我们使用线性和角度尺寸来量化干骺端形状。利用单变量、多变量数据和计量回归(部分最小二乘法和系统发育广义最小二乘法回归),我们探讨了现存腕足动物可以通过干骺端形状进行区分的假设。单变量和多变量数据的显著差异以及异速回归允许在亚科、部落和属的水平上区分栉水母类。我们的研究表明,多变量数据遵循布朗运动的预期分布,可显著区分不同分类级别的类群。疣猴的干骺端具有发达的下横突、较短的肺泡平面和较短的干骺端,而栉猴的干骺端具有发达的上横突、较长的肺泡平面和较长的干骺端。每个亚科中都存在与这一模式不同的例外情况,本研究强调了疣猴科中的疣猴和Presbytis、ercopithecini科中的Allenopithecus以及Papionini科中的Theropithecus和Lophocebus的特殊解剖结构。我们还证明,横突的相对发育、齿面的相对长度和先骨干的倾斜度都是二态性特征。具体而言,我们发现疣鼻猴(Procolobus verus)、猿猴(Nasalis larvatus)和猿猴(Papio anubis)的骨骺具有强烈的二态性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anatomy of the mandibular symphysis of extant cercopithecids: taxonomy and variation
The symphyseal anatomy of extant and fossil cercopithecids has not yet been demonstrated as a useful tool for taxonomic discrimination, and the source of variation in cercopithecid symphysis has not been addressed on a broad taxonomic scale. Here, we used linear and angular dimensions to quantify symphysis shape. Using univariate, multivariate data and allometric regressions (partial least squares and phylogenetic generalized least square regressions), we addressed the hypothesis that extant cercopithecids can be distinguished by symphysis shape. Significant differences in univariate and multivariate data and allometric regressions permitted to distinguish cercopithecids at the subfamilial, tribal, and genus levels. We showed that multivariate data followed the distribution expected under Brownian Motion and significantly discriminates taxa at different taxonomic levels. Colobine symphysis are characterized by developed inferior transverse tori, short planum alveolare, and short symphysis, whereas cercopithecine symphysis are characterized by developed superior transverse tori, long planum alveolare, and long symphysis. Exceptions to this pattern exist within each subfamily, and this study underlines the particular anatomy of Colobus and Presbytis among the colobines, Allenopithecus among the Cercopithecini, and Theropithecus and Lophocebus among the Papionini. We also demonstrate that the relative development of the transverse tori, the relative length of the planum alveolare and symphyseal inclination are dimorphic traits. Specifically, we show that the symphysis of Procolobus verus, Nasalis larvatus, and Papio anubis is strongly dimorphic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bird Name-a-thon: Categorizing English bird names using crowdsourcing Nutritional analysis of commercially available, complete plant- and meat-based dry dog foods in the UK Trace Elements in Fish: Assessment of bioaccumulation and associated health risks. Effects of fasting on heat-stressed broiler chickens: part I- growth performance, meat quality, gut histomorphological and microbial responses Additions to the list of arthropods of Reunion Island
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1