根据欧盟法律转移缓刑犯:荷兰的改造与合法性问题

IF 0.8 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY European Journal of Probation Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1177/20662203241244987
Adriano Martufi, Marloes van Noorloos
{"title":"根据欧盟法律转移缓刑犯:荷兰的改造与合法性问题","authors":"Adriano Martufi, Marloes van Noorloos","doi":"10.1177/20662203241244987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the thorniest issues raised by the implementation in the Netherlands of Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA, often referred to as ‘European Probation Order’. It delves into Dutch law and practice regarding mutual recognition of probation measures and alternative sanctions and analyses how the Netherlands deals with principled questions with respect to the legitimacy of the transfer of probationers, both as a mechanism in itself and with respect to the ultimate goal of promoting social rehabilitation. The analysis focuses on (i) the basic tenets of the Dutch implementation (goals, competent authorities and application in Dutch legal practice); (ii) challenging issues regarding the types of probation measures and alternative sanctions eligible for recognition and the implementation of refusal grounds and (iii) how procedural rights and informed consent of the sentenced person are dealt with in relation to social rehabilitation.","PeriodicalId":44523,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Probation","volume":"94 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transfer of probationers under EU law: Rehabilitation and the question of legitimacy in the Netherlands\",\"authors\":\"Adriano Martufi, Marloes van Noorloos\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20662203241244987\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyses the thorniest issues raised by the implementation in the Netherlands of Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA, often referred to as ‘European Probation Order’. It delves into Dutch law and practice regarding mutual recognition of probation measures and alternative sanctions and analyses how the Netherlands deals with principled questions with respect to the legitimacy of the transfer of probationers, both as a mechanism in itself and with respect to the ultimate goal of promoting social rehabilitation. The analysis focuses on (i) the basic tenets of the Dutch implementation (goals, competent authorities and application in Dutch legal practice); (ii) challenging issues regarding the types of probation measures and alternative sanctions eligible for recognition and the implementation of refusal grounds and (iii) how procedural rights and informed consent of the sentenced person are dealt with in relation to social rehabilitation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Probation\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Probation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20662203241244987\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Probation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20662203241244987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了在荷兰实施第 2008/947/JHA 号框架决定(通常被称为 "欧洲缓刑令")所引发的棘手问题。文章深入探讨了荷兰在相互承认缓刑措施和替代性制裁方面的法律和实践,并分析了荷兰是如何处理缓刑犯转狱合法性方面的原则性问题的,这既是机制本身的问题,也是促进社会康复这一最终目标的问题。分析的重点是:(i) 荷兰执行的基本原则(目标、主管当局和在荷兰法律实践中的应用);(ii) 关于有资格获得承认的缓刑措施和替代制裁类型以及拒绝理由的执行方面的挑战性问题;(iii) 如何处理与社会康复有关的程序性权利和被判刑人的知情同意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transfer of probationers under EU law: Rehabilitation and the question of legitimacy in the Netherlands
This article analyses the thorniest issues raised by the implementation in the Netherlands of Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA, often referred to as ‘European Probation Order’. It delves into Dutch law and practice regarding mutual recognition of probation measures and alternative sanctions and analyses how the Netherlands deals with principled questions with respect to the legitimacy of the transfer of probationers, both as a mechanism in itself and with respect to the ultimate goal of promoting social rehabilitation. The analysis focuses on (i) the basic tenets of the Dutch implementation (goals, competent authorities and application in Dutch legal practice); (ii) challenging issues regarding the types of probation measures and alternative sanctions eligible for recognition and the implementation of refusal grounds and (iii) how procedural rights and informed consent of the sentenced person are dealt with in relation to social rehabilitation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Probation
European Journal of Probation CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Social reintegration of individuals convicted of terrorism in France: From paradox to blind spot? ‘You take me for a moron or what’? Analysing French felony courts through legitimacy of justice and therapeutic jurisprudence lenses Profile of men and women sentenced to community services: Risk factors and social vulnerability Enforcement of alternative measures to detention in EU countries: The Italian situation Preface to the special edition on the application of the principle of mutual trust in matters of prison and probation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1