我愿意为 400 美元而接受性别差异:利用 "危险!"分析对风险的态度

IF 1.1 Q3 ECONOMICS Eastern Economic Journal Pub Date : 2024-04-07 DOI:10.1057/s41302-024-00270-9
Michael A. Leeds, Eva Marikova Leeds
{"title":"我愿意为 400 美元而接受性别差异:利用 \"危险!\"分析对风险的态度","authors":"Michael A. Leeds, Eva Marikova Leeds","doi":"10.1057/s41302-024-00270-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Studies have shown that women perform worse than men in winner-take-all competitions and often avoid such settings entirely, which could put women at a significant disadvantage in the labor market. Recent research, however, has challenged this view. One problem with testing for risk averse behavior is the difficulty of finding settings in which people can display it. We find such a setting in the Final Jeopardy segment of the game show <i>Jeopardy!</i> Using data on wagers in Final Jeopardy, we show that women who compete on the show are no more risk averse than men.</p>","PeriodicalId":45363,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Economic Journal","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"I’ll Take Gender Differences for $400: Using Jeopardy! to Analyze Attitudes Toward Risk\",\"authors\":\"Michael A. Leeds, Eva Marikova Leeds\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s41302-024-00270-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Studies have shown that women perform worse than men in winner-take-all competitions and often avoid such settings entirely, which could put women at a significant disadvantage in the labor market. Recent research, however, has challenged this view. One problem with testing for risk averse behavior is the difficulty of finding settings in which people can display it. We find such a setting in the Final Jeopardy segment of the game show <i>Jeopardy!</i> Using data on wagers in Final Jeopardy, we show that women who compete on the show are no more risk averse than men.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eastern Economic Journal\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eastern Economic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41302-024-00270-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eastern Economic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41302-024-00270-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究表明,女性在 "赢家通吃 "的竞争中表现不如男性,她们往往会完全避免这种竞争,这可能会使女性在劳动力市场中处于明显的劣势。然而,最近的研究对这一观点提出了质疑。测试风险规避行为的一个问题是很难找到人们可以表现出风险规避行为的环境。我们在游戏节目《危险》(Jeopardy)的 "最终危险"(Final Jeopardy)环节中找到了这样的环境!利用《最终危情》中的下注数据,我们发现参加该节目比赛的女性并不比男性更厌恶风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
I’ll Take Gender Differences for $400: Using Jeopardy! to Analyze Attitudes Toward Risk

Studies have shown that women perform worse than men in winner-take-all competitions and often avoid such settings entirely, which could put women at a significant disadvantage in the labor market. Recent research, however, has challenged this view. One problem with testing for risk averse behavior is the difficulty of finding settings in which people can display it. We find such a setting in the Final Jeopardy segment of the game show Jeopardy! Using data on wagers in Final Jeopardy, we show that women who compete on the show are no more risk averse than men.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Eastern Economic Journal, a quarterly publication of the Eastern Economic Association, was established in 1973. The EEJ publishes papers written from every perspective, in all areas of economics and is committed to free and open intellectual inquiry from diverse philosophical perspectives. It welcomes manuscripts that are methodological and philosophical as well as empirical and theoretical. Readability and general interest are major factors in publication decision.
期刊最新文献
Parallel Worlds? The Partisan Effects of COVID-19 on Real Estate Much Ado about Nothing? Counterterrorist Legislation has Few Effects David Colander and Modern Economics U.S. Intervention and Coercion-Enabling Capital: Evidence from El Salvador AI and Warfare: A Rational Choice Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1