无银行和贫困?探索银行业务与贫困的长期互动关系

IF 2.5 3区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS Journal of Consumer Affairs Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1111/joca.12576
John Creamer, Lewis Warren
{"title":"无银行和贫困?探索银行业务与贫困的长期互动关系","authors":"John Creamer,&nbsp;Lewis Warren","doi":"10.1111/joca.12576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In 2019, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) reported that 7.1 million households in the United States (5.4%) were unbanked and lacked a checking or savings account). Using three leading household surveys, this paper documents how the interaction between bank access and poverty has evolved over time. We present a historical time series of unbanked rates, showing high-unbanked rates for those in poverty even with increases in financial access over time. In the 1980s, 49.6% of households in poverty were unbanked while 22.8% were unbanked in 2019. Unbanked rates were even higher for Black and Hispanic households that were in poverty. In the 1980s, these groups had unbanked rates of 73.6% and 66.5% which declined to 38.4% and 31.8% in 2019, respectively. To explain differences in banking rates by race, we use binary Kitagawa-Oaxaca-Blinder decompositions. Socio-demographic characteristics explain less than half the difference in unbanked rates for Blacks and around half for Hispanics.</p>","PeriodicalId":47976,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Affairs","volume":"58 2","pages":"506-537"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unbanked and impoverished? Exploring banking and poverty interactions over time\",\"authors\":\"John Creamer,&nbsp;Lewis Warren\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joca.12576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In 2019, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) reported that 7.1 million households in the United States (5.4%) were unbanked and lacked a checking or savings account). Using three leading household surveys, this paper documents how the interaction between bank access and poverty has evolved over time. We present a historical time series of unbanked rates, showing high-unbanked rates for those in poverty even with increases in financial access over time. In the 1980s, 49.6% of households in poverty were unbanked while 22.8% were unbanked in 2019. Unbanked rates were even higher for Black and Hispanic households that were in poverty. In the 1980s, these groups had unbanked rates of 73.6% and 66.5% which declined to 38.4% and 31.8% in 2019, respectively. To explain differences in banking rates by race, we use binary Kitagawa-Oaxaca-Blinder decompositions. Socio-demographic characteristics explain less than half the difference in unbanked rates for Blacks and around half for Hispanics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Consumer Affairs\",\"volume\":\"58 2\",\"pages\":\"506-537\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Consumer Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joca.12576\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joca.12576","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据美国联邦存款保险公司(FDIC)报告,2019 年美国有 710 万户家庭(5.4%)没有银行账户,没有支票或储蓄账户。)本文利用三项主要的家庭调查,记录了银行服务与贫困之间的相互作用是如何随着时间的推移而演变的。我们展示了无银行账户率的历史时间序列,表明即使金融服务随时间推移而增加,贫困人口的无银行账户率也很高。20 世纪 80 年代,49.6% 的贫困家庭没有银行账户,而到 2019 年,22.8% 的贫困家庭没有银行账户。黑人和西班牙裔贫困家庭的无银行账户率甚至更高。20 世纪 80 年代,这两个群体的无银行账户率分别为 73.6% 和 66.5%,2019 年分别降至 38.4% 和 31.8%。为了解释不同种族的银行比率差异,我们使用了二元北川-瓦哈卡-布林德分解法。社会人口特征可以解释黑人和西班牙裔无银行账户比率差异的不到一半。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unbanked and impoverished? Exploring banking and poverty interactions over time

In 2019, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) reported that 7.1 million households in the United States (5.4%) were unbanked and lacked a checking or savings account). Using three leading household surveys, this paper documents how the interaction between bank access and poverty has evolved over time. We present a historical time series of unbanked rates, showing high-unbanked rates for those in poverty even with increases in financial access over time. In the 1980s, 49.6% of households in poverty were unbanked while 22.8% were unbanked in 2019. Unbanked rates were even higher for Black and Hispanic households that were in poverty. In the 1980s, these groups had unbanked rates of 73.6% and 66.5% which declined to 38.4% and 31.8% in 2019, respectively. To explain differences in banking rates by race, we use binary Kitagawa-Oaxaca-Blinder decompositions. Socio-demographic characteristics explain less than half the difference in unbanked rates for Blacks and around half for Hispanics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
17.90%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The ISI impact score of Journal of Consumer Affairs now places it among the leading business journals and one of the top handful of marketing- related publications. The immediacy index score, showing how swiftly the published studies are cited or applied in other publications, places JCA seventh of those same 77 journals. More importantly, in these difficult economic times, JCA is the leading journal whose focus for over four decades has been on the interests of consumers in the marketplace. With the journal"s origins in the consumer movement and consumer protection concerns, the focus for papers in terms of both research questions and implications must involve the consumer"s interest and topics must be addressed from the consumers point of view.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The effect size and nonlinearity of the relationship between cannabis consumption and consumer self‐perceived mental health: A study based on eight national surveys in Canada How information processing style and vaccine pace development messaging influence vaccine acceptance: A mixed methods exploration In Memoriam: Monroe P. Friedman How different religiosity facets affect materialism, hedonistic shopping values, and compulsive buying: Toward mediation‐moderation effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1