2014 至 2020 年全美口服抗凝剂使用和个人支出趋势

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs Pub Date : 2024-04-07 DOI:10.1007/s40256-024-00638-4
Omar S. Alkhezi, Leo F. Buckley, John Fanikos
{"title":"2014 至 2020 年全美口服抗凝剂使用和个人支出趋势","authors":"Omar S. Alkhezi,&nbsp;Leo F. Buckley,&nbsp;John Fanikos","doi":"10.1007/s40256-024-00638-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Landmark clinical trials have expended the indications for the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), but contemporary data on usage and expenditure patterns are lacking.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to assess annual trends in oral anticoagulant (OAC) utilization and expenditure across the United States (US) from 2014 to 2020.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We utilized the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) to study the trends of use and expenditures of warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban between 2014 and 2020 in the US. Survey respondents reported OAC use within the past year, which was verified against pharmacy records. Payment information was obtained from the respondent’s pharmacy and was categorized as third-party or self/out-of-pocket. Potential indications and medical conditions of interest for OAC therapy were identified from respondent-reported medical conditions. We estimated the national number of OAC users and total expenditures across age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance, and medical condition subgroups. Trends of OAC users’ characteristics, expenditure, and number of prescriptions were evaluated using the Mann–Kendall test for trends.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Between 2014 and 2020, the number of warfarin users decreased from 3.8 million (70% of all OAC users) to 2.2 million (<i>p </i>= 0.007) [29% of all OAC users], while the number of DOAC users increased from 1.6 million (30% of all OAC users) to 5.4 million (<i>p </i>= 0.003) [70% of all OAC users]. The total expenditure of OACs in the US increased from $3.4 billion in 2014 to $17.8 billion in 2020 (<i>p </i>= 0.003), which was driven by the increase in DOAC expenditures (<i>p </i>= 0.003).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>DOACs have replaced warfarin as the preferred OAC in the US. The increased costs associated with DOAC use may decline when generic formulations are approved.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"24 3","pages":"433 - 444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in Oral Anticoagulant Use and Individual Expenditures Across the United States from 2014 to 2020\",\"authors\":\"Omar S. Alkhezi,&nbsp;Leo F. Buckley,&nbsp;John Fanikos\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40256-024-00638-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Landmark clinical trials have expended the indications for the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), but contemporary data on usage and expenditure patterns are lacking.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to assess annual trends in oral anticoagulant (OAC) utilization and expenditure across the United States (US) from 2014 to 2020.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We utilized the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) to study the trends of use and expenditures of warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban between 2014 and 2020 in the US. Survey respondents reported OAC use within the past year, which was verified against pharmacy records. Payment information was obtained from the respondent’s pharmacy and was categorized as third-party or self/out-of-pocket. Potential indications and medical conditions of interest for OAC therapy were identified from respondent-reported medical conditions. We estimated the national number of OAC users and total expenditures across age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance, and medical condition subgroups. Trends of OAC users’ characteristics, expenditure, and number of prescriptions were evaluated using the Mann–Kendall test for trends.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Between 2014 and 2020, the number of warfarin users decreased from 3.8 million (70% of all OAC users) to 2.2 million (<i>p </i>= 0.007) [29% of all OAC users], while the number of DOAC users increased from 1.6 million (30% of all OAC users) to 5.4 million (<i>p </i>= 0.003) [70% of all OAC users]. The total expenditure of OACs in the US increased from $3.4 billion in 2014 to $17.8 billion in 2020 (<i>p </i>= 0.003), which was driven by the increase in DOAC expenditures (<i>p </i>= 0.003).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>DOACs have replaced warfarin as the preferred OAC in the US. The increased costs associated with DOAC use may decline when generic formulations are approved.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs\",\"volume\":\"24 3\",\"pages\":\"433 - 444\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40256-024-00638-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40256-024-00638-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 背景 具有里程碑意义的临床试验扩展了直接口服抗凝药(DOACs)的适应症,但缺乏有关使用和支出模式的当代数据。 目的 本研究旨在评估 2014 年至 2020 年美国口服抗凝药(OAC)使用和支出的年度趋势。 方法 我们利用医疗支出小组调查(MEPS)研究了 2014 年至 2020 年美国华法林、达比加群、利伐沙班、阿哌沙班和依度沙班的使用和支出趋势。调查对象报告了过去一年中 OAC 的使用情况,并与药房记录进行了核对。支付信息从受访者的药房获得,并分为第三方支付或自付/自费支付。根据受访者报告的医疗状况确定了 OAC 治疗的潜在适应症和相关医疗条件。我们估算了全国 OAC 使用者的人数以及不同年龄、性别、种族、民族、保险和病情亚群的总支出。我们使用 Mann-Kendall 趋势检验法评估了 OAC 使用者的特征、支出和处方数量的变化趋势。 结果 2014 年至 2020 年间,华法林用户数量从 380 万(占所有 OAC 用户的 70%)减少到 220 万(p = 0.007)[占所有 OAC 用户的 29%],而 DOAC 用户数量从 160 万(占所有 OAC 用户的 30%)增加到 540 万(p = 0.003)[占所有 OAC 用户的 70%]。美国的 OACs 总支出从 2014 年的 34 亿美元增至 2020 年的 178 亿美元(p = 0.003),这主要是 DOAC 支出增加所致(p = 0.003)。 结论 DOAC 已取代华法林成为美国首选的 OAC。在非专利制剂获得批准后,与 DOAC 使用相关的成本增加可能会下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trends in Oral Anticoagulant Use and Individual Expenditures Across the United States from 2014 to 2020

Background

Landmark clinical trials have expended the indications for the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), but contemporary data on usage and expenditure patterns are lacking.

Objective

This study aimed to assess annual trends in oral anticoagulant (OAC) utilization and expenditure across the United States (US) from 2014 to 2020.

Methods

We utilized the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) to study the trends of use and expenditures of warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban between 2014 and 2020 in the US. Survey respondents reported OAC use within the past year, which was verified against pharmacy records. Payment information was obtained from the respondent’s pharmacy and was categorized as third-party or self/out-of-pocket. Potential indications and medical conditions of interest for OAC therapy were identified from respondent-reported medical conditions. We estimated the national number of OAC users and total expenditures across age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance, and medical condition subgroups. Trends of OAC users’ characteristics, expenditure, and number of prescriptions were evaluated using the Mann–Kendall test for trends.

Results

Between 2014 and 2020, the number of warfarin users decreased from 3.8 million (70% of all OAC users) to 2.2 million (= 0.007) [29% of all OAC users], while the number of DOAC users increased from 1.6 million (30% of all OAC users) to 5.4 million (= 0.003) [70% of all OAC users]. The total expenditure of OACs in the US increased from $3.4 billion in 2014 to $17.8 billion in 2020 (= 0.003), which was driven by the increase in DOAC expenditures (= 0.003).

Conclusions

DOACs have replaced warfarin as the preferred OAC in the US. The increased costs associated with DOAC use may decline when generic formulations are approved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting rational therapy within the discipline of cardiology, the American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs covers all aspects of the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, particularly the place in therapy of newer and established agents. Via a program of reviews and original clinical research articles, the journal addresses major issues relating to treatment of these disorders, including the pharmacology, efficacy and adverse effects of the major classes of drugs; information on newly developed drugs and drug classes; the therapeutic implications of latest research into the aetiology of cardiovascular disorders; and the practical management of specific clinical situations. The American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.
期刊最新文献
Cost Effectiveness of Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction between Cilostazol and Rosuvastatin in Healthy Participants. Use of Direct Anticoagulants in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Review of the Current Evidence and Emerging Perspectives. Impact of Antibacterials on the Quality of Anticoagulation Control in Patients Initiating Warfarin Therapy. Sacubitril-Valsartan Lowers Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence and Left Atrial Volume Post-catheter Ablation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1