{"title":"2023 年 2 月至 4 月的地球同步磁极穿越情况","authors":"A. V. Dmitriev","doi":"10.1134/s001095252360035x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>Geosynchronous magnetopause crossings (GMCs) were analyzed during geomagnetic storms on February 26, March 23, and April 23, 2023. GMC-associated magnetosheath intervals were identified using magnetic data acquired from the <i>GOES-16</i> and <i>GOES-17</i> spacecraft. A comparative analysis of various magnetopause models was performed on the base of solar wind conditions measured by the <i>THEMIS-E</i> spacecraft and the <i>Wind</i> interplanetary monitor. The analysis of models was based on statistical parameters for determining magnetosheath intervals. It was shown that for all three storms, the model presented in [1] demonstrated the best accuracy. For events of moderate magnetic storms against the background of small negative <i>Bz</i> component of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF), good results are obtained with the model described in [2]. For extreme events with very high solar wind pressures and/or very strong negative IMF <i>Bz</i>, the model shown in [3] exhibits good accuracy, and satisfactory accuracy is also demonstrated by models presented in [4, 5]. It was shown that the accuracy of the models was affected by the following factors and effects: the choice of interplanetary monitor, the dependence of the model on the solar wind pressure, the <i>Bz</i> saturation effect, the dawn–dusk magnetopause asymmetry, and the effect of prehistory.</p>","PeriodicalId":56319,"journal":{"name":"Cosmic Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geosynchronous Magnetopause Crossings in February–April 2023\",\"authors\":\"A. V. Dmitriev\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/s001095252360035x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Abstract</h3><p>Geosynchronous magnetopause crossings (GMCs) were analyzed during geomagnetic storms on February 26, March 23, and April 23, 2023. GMC-associated magnetosheath intervals were identified using magnetic data acquired from the <i>GOES-16</i> and <i>GOES-17</i> spacecraft. A comparative analysis of various magnetopause models was performed on the base of solar wind conditions measured by the <i>THEMIS-E</i> spacecraft and the <i>Wind</i> interplanetary monitor. The analysis of models was based on statistical parameters for determining magnetosheath intervals. It was shown that for all three storms, the model presented in [1] demonstrated the best accuracy. For events of moderate magnetic storms against the background of small negative <i>Bz</i> component of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF), good results are obtained with the model described in [2]. For extreme events with very high solar wind pressures and/or very strong negative IMF <i>Bz</i>, the model shown in [3] exhibits good accuracy, and satisfactory accuracy is also demonstrated by models presented in [4, 5]. It was shown that the accuracy of the models was affected by the following factors and effects: the choice of interplanetary monitor, the dependence of the model on the solar wind pressure, the <i>Bz</i> saturation effect, the dawn–dusk magnetopause asymmetry, and the effect of prehistory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cosmic Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cosmic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1134/s001095252360035x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cosmic Research","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1134/s001095252360035x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Geosynchronous Magnetopause Crossings in February–April 2023
Abstract
Geosynchronous magnetopause crossings (GMCs) were analyzed during geomagnetic storms on February 26, March 23, and April 23, 2023. GMC-associated magnetosheath intervals were identified using magnetic data acquired from the GOES-16 and GOES-17 spacecraft. A comparative analysis of various magnetopause models was performed on the base of solar wind conditions measured by the THEMIS-E spacecraft and the Wind interplanetary monitor. The analysis of models was based on statistical parameters for determining magnetosheath intervals. It was shown that for all three storms, the model presented in [1] demonstrated the best accuracy. For events of moderate magnetic storms against the background of small negative Bz component of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF), good results are obtained with the model described in [2]. For extreme events with very high solar wind pressures and/or very strong negative IMF Bz, the model shown in [3] exhibits good accuracy, and satisfactory accuracy is also demonstrated by models presented in [4, 5]. It was shown that the accuracy of the models was affected by the following factors and effects: the choice of interplanetary monitor, the dependence of the model on the solar wind pressure, the Bz saturation effect, the dawn–dusk magnetopause asymmetry, and the effect of prehistory.
期刊介绍:
Cosmic Research publishes scientific papers covering all subjects of space science and technology, including the following: ballistics, flight dynamics of the Earth’s artificial satellites and automatic interplanetary stations; problems of transatmospheric descent; design and structure of spacecraft and scientific research instrumentation; life support systems and radiation safety of manned spacecrafts; exploration of the Earth from Space; exploration of near space; exploration of the Sun, planets, secondary planets, and interplanetary medium; exploration of stars, nebulae, interstellar medium, galaxies, and quasars from spacecraft; and various astrophysical problems related to space exploration. A chronicle of scientific events and other notices concerning the main topics of the journal are also presented.