离子解离的一般最基本规则:离子化分子

IF 1.9 3区 化学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Journal of Mass Spectrometry Pub Date : 2024-04-19 DOI:10.1002/jms.5012
Adriano Reis, Marcos N. Eberlin
{"title":"离子解离的一般最基本规则:离子化分子","authors":"Adriano Reis,&nbsp;Marcos N. Eberlin","doi":"10.1002/jms.5012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Herein we revisit a basic rule for the interpretation of ion chemistry of ionized molecules, first proposed by the pioneers of MS spectra interpretation, but somewhat overlooked over the years. This rule states that, when rationalizing or predicting the dissociation chemistry of an ionized molecule (M<sup>+.</sup>), a model analog to the “mobile proton model,” that is, a “mobile electron model” via “e<sup>-</sup>-jumping” should be considered. Ground-state M<sup>+.</sup> is indeed the first species to be considered, but “e<sup>-</sup>-jumping” may eventually lead to other more energetic electromers—<i>ionized molecules that differ only in the location of the missing electron</i>—and each one of these electromers may dissociate via distinctive routes. In such a scenario, the route involving not necessarily the ground-state M<sup>+.</sup>, but the most labile electromer could become predominant or even exclusive. We argue that this “most labile electromer” rule, as well as an analogous “most labile protomer” rule that we have proposed for protonated molecules in an accompanying article, with the application of our conventional toolbox of a few cleavages and rearrangements, greatly simplifies the interpretation and prediction of ion chemistry.</p>","PeriodicalId":16178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A general, most basic rule for ion dissociation: Ionized molecules\",\"authors\":\"Adriano Reis,&nbsp;Marcos N. Eberlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jms.5012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Herein we revisit a basic rule for the interpretation of ion chemistry of ionized molecules, first proposed by the pioneers of MS spectra interpretation, but somewhat overlooked over the years. This rule states that, when rationalizing or predicting the dissociation chemistry of an ionized molecule (M<sup>+.</sup>), a model analog to the “mobile proton model,” that is, a “mobile electron model” via “e<sup>-</sup>-jumping” should be considered. Ground-state M<sup>+.</sup> is indeed the first species to be considered, but “e<sup>-</sup>-jumping” may eventually lead to other more energetic electromers—<i>ionized molecules that differ only in the location of the missing electron</i>—and each one of these electromers may dissociate via distinctive routes. In such a scenario, the route involving not necessarily the ground-state M<sup>+.</sup>, but the most labile electromer could become predominant or even exclusive. We argue that this “most labile electromer” rule, as well as an analogous “most labile protomer” rule that we have proposed for protonated molecules in an accompanying article, with the application of our conventional toolbox of a few cleavages and rearrangements, greatly simplifies the interpretation and prediction of ion chemistry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mass Spectrometry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mass Spectrometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jms.5012\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jms.5012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在此,我们重温一下解释电离分子离子化学性质的基本规则,该规则最早由质谱解释的先驱提出,但多年来一直被忽视。该规则指出,在合理解释或预测电离分子(M+.)的解离化学时,应考虑与 "移动质子模型 "类似的模型,即通过 "e--跳跃 "的 "移动电子模型"。地面态的 M+. 确实是第一个要考虑的物种,但 "电子跳跃 "最终可能会导致其他能量更高的电子体--电离分子,它们的区别仅仅在于缺失电子的位置--这些电子体中的每一个都可能通过不同的途径解离。在这种情况下,涉及基态 M+ 的途径不一定是最易变的电解质,而可能成为主要的甚至是唯一的途径。我们认为,这种 "最易电离者 "规则,以及我们在随附文章中针对质子化分子提出的类似的 "最易原生者 "规则,再加上我们应用一些裂解和重排的传统工具箱,大大简化了离子化学的解释和预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A general, most basic rule for ion dissociation: Ionized molecules

Herein we revisit a basic rule for the interpretation of ion chemistry of ionized molecules, first proposed by the pioneers of MS spectra interpretation, but somewhat overlooked over the years. This rule states that, when rationalizing or predicting the dissociation chemistry of an ionized molecule (M+.), a model analog to the “mobile proton model,” that is, a “mobile electron model” via “e--jumping” should be considered. Ground-state M+. is indeed the first species to be considered, but “e--jumping” may eventually lead to other more energetic electromers—ionized molecules that differ only in the location of the missing electron—and each one of these electromers may dissociate via distinctive routes. In such a scenario, the route involving not necessarily the ground-state M+., but the most labile electromer could become predominant or even exclusive. We argue that this “most labile electromer” rule, as well as an analogous “most labile protomer” rule that we have proposed for protonated molecules in an accompanying article, with the application of our conventional toolbox of a few cleavages and rearrangements, greatly simplifies the interpretation and prediction of ion chemistry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mass Spectrometry
Journal of Mass Spectrometry 化学-光谱学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mass Spectrometry publishes papers on a broad range of topics of interest to scientists working in both fundamental and applied areas involving the study of gaseous ions. The aim of JMS is to serve the scientific community with information provided and arranged to help senior investigators to better stay abreast of new discoveries and studies in their own field, to make them aware of events and developments in associated fields, and to provide students and newcomers the basic tools with which to learn fundamental and applied aspects of mass spectrometry.
期刊最新文献
Advancing Native Mass Spectrometry Toward Cellular Biology Strategies for Top–Down Hydrogen Deuterium Exchange-Mass Spectrometry: A Mini Review and Perspective B4C-Assisted Paper Spray Ionization Mass Spectrometry Issue Information Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Gatifloxacin and Dexamethasone in Rabbit Ocular Biofluid Using a Sensitive and Selective LC–MS/MS Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1