预测不同竹类地上生物量的广义异速模型

IF 5.8 2区 生物学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING Biomass & Bioenergy Pub Date : 2024-04-20 DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107215
Long-En Li , Tian-Ming Yen , Yu-Jen Lin
{"title":"预测不同竹类地上生物量的广义异速模型","authors":"Long-En Li ,&nbsp;Tian-Ming Yen ,&nbsp;Yu-Jen Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to develop a generalized allometric model to predict the aboveground biomass (AGB) of various bamboo species. Four crucial bamboo species, namely, makino bamboo (<em>Phyllostachys makinoi</em>), moso bamboo (<em>Phyllostachys pubescens</em>), thorny bamboo (<em>Bambusa stenostachya</em>), and ma bamboo (<em>Dendrocalamus latiflorus</em>), were used. This study collected data from previous studies with sample sizes of 90, Diameter at breast height (DBH), culm height (H), and age (A) were used as independent variables to develop three models for predicting AGB, where Model I used only DBH, Model II used DBH and H, and Model III used DBH, H, and A as independent variables. The results showed that Models II and III were superior to Model I based on the root mean square error (RMSE). Moreover, Model III only slightly improved the AGB prediction compared with Model II. This study also evaluated the predictive ability of the models for bamboo species based on the bias and RMSE values. The bias value helps to assess whether the AGB of a single bamboo species is under- or overestimated when that value appears positive or negative in the models. The RMSE values were higher for makino and ma bamboo in Model III when comparing the RMSE values for each bamboo species between Models II and III. However, it was higher in moso and thorny bamboo in Model II. Therefore, it was difficult to infer which model was better for all species because the ability to predict AGB was inconsistent among species for these two models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":253,"journal":{"name":"Biomass & Bioenergy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A generalized allometric model for predicting aboveground biomass across various bamboo species\",\"authors\":\"Long-En Li ,&nbsp;Tian-Ming Yen ,&nbsp;Yu-Jen Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study aimed to develop a generalized allometric model to predict the aboveground biomass (AGB) of various bamboo species. Four crucial bamboo species, namely, makino bamboo (<em>Phyllostachys makinoi</em>), moso bamboo (<em>Phyllostachys pubescens</em>), thorny bamboo (<em>Bambusa stenostachya</em>), and ma bamboo (<em>Dendrocalamus latiflorus</em>), were used. This study collected data from previous studies with sample sizes of 90, Diameter at breast height (DBH), culm height (H), and age (A) were used as independent variables to develop three models for predicting AGB, where Model I used only DBH, Model II used DBH and H, and Model III used DBH, H, and A as independent variables. The results showed that Models II and III were superior to Model I based on the root mean square error (RMSE). Moreover, Model III only slightly improved the AGB prediction compared with Model II. This study also evaluated the predictive ability of the models for bamboo species based on the bias and RMSE values. The bias value helps to assess whether the AGB of a single bamboo species is under- or overestimated when that value appears positive or negative in the models. The RMSE values were higher for makino and ma bamboo in Model III when comparing the RMSE values for each bamboo species between Models II and III. However, it was higher in moso and thorny bamboo in Model II. Therefore, it was difficult to infer which model was better for all species because the ability to predict AGB was inconsistent among species for these two models.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomass & Bioenergy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomass & Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953424001685\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomass & Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953424001685","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在建立一个广义的计量模型,以预测各种竹类的地上生物量(AGB)。研究使用了四个重要竹种,即牧野竹(Phyllostachys makinoi)、毛竹(Phyllostachys pubescens)、刺竹(Bambusa stenostachya)和马竹(Dendrocalamus latiflorus)。本研究收集了以往研究的数据,样本量为90个,以胸径(DBH)、秆高(H)和年龄(A)为自变量,建立了三个预测AGB的模型,其中模型I仅使用DBH,模型II使用DBH和H,模型III使用DBH、H和A作为自变量。结果表明,根据均方根误差(RMSE),模型 II 和模型 III 优于模型 I。此外,与模型 II 相比,模型 III 只略微提高了对 AGB 的预测。本研究还根据偏倚值和均方根误差值评估了模型对竹类的预测能力。偏倚值有助于评估当单一竹类的 AGB 值在模型中出现正值或负值时,该值是被低估还是被高估。比较模型 II 和模型 III 中各竹种的均方根误差值,模型 III 中毛竹和马竹的均方根误差值较高。然而,模型 II 中毛竹和刺竹的均方根误差值较高。因此,很难推断哪个模型对所有竹种都更好,因为这两个模型对不同竹种的 AGB 预测能力并不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A generalized allometric model for predicting aboveground biomass across various bamboo species

This study aimed to develop a generalized allometric model to predict the aboveground biomass (AGB) of various bamboo species. Four crucial bamboo species, namely, makino bamboo (Phyllostachys makinoi), moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens), thorny bamboo (Bambusa stenostachya), and ma bamboo (Dendrocalamus latiflorus), were used. This study collected data from previous studies with sample sizes of 90, Diameter at breast height (DBH), culm height (H), and age (A) were used as independent variables to develop three models for predicting AGB, where Model I used only DBH, Model II used DBH and H, and Model III used DBH, H, and A as independent variables. The results showed that Models II and III were superior to Model I based on the root mean square error (RMSE). Moreover, Model III only slightly improved the AGB prediction compared with Model II. This study also evaluated the predictive ability of the models for bamboo species based on the bias and RMSE values. The bias value helps to assess whether the AGB of a single bamboo species is under- or overestimated when that value appears positive or negative in the models. The RMSE values were higher for makino and ma bamboo in Model III when comparing the RMSE values for each bamboo species between Models II and III. However, it was higher in moso and thorny bamboo in Model II. Therefore, it was difficult to infer which model was better for all species because the ability to predict AGB was inconsistent among species for these two models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomass & Bioenergy
Biomass & Bioenergy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Biomass & Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers and short communications, review articles and case studies on biological resources, chemical and biological processes, and biomass products for new renewable sources of energy and materials. The scope of the journal extends to the environmental, management and economic aspects of biomass and bioenergy. Key areas covered by the journal: • Biomass: sources, energy crop production processes, genetic improvements, composition. Please note that research on these biomass subjects must be linked directly to bioenergy generation. • Biological Residues: residues/rests from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (palm, sugar etc), processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Papers on the use of biomass residues through innovative processes/technological novelty and/or consideration of feedstock/system sustainability (or unsustainability) are welcomed. However waste treatment processes and pollution control or mitigation which are only tangentially related to bioenergy are not in the scope of the journal, as they are more suited to publications in the environmental arena. Papers that describe conventional waste streams (ie well described in existing literature) that do not empirically address ''new'' added value from the process are not suitable for submission to the journal. • Bioenergy Processes: fermentations, thermochemical conversions, liquid and gaseous fuels, and petrochemical substitutes • Bioenergy Utilization: direct combustion, gasification, electricity production, chemical processes, and by-product remediation • Biomass and the Environment: carbon cycle, the net energy efficiency of bioenergy systems, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
期刊最新文献
Data-driven based financial analysis of concentrated solar power integrating biomass and thermal energy storage: A profitability perspective Insight into lignin oxidative depolymerization in ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents Lignocellulosic biomass to glycols: Simultaneous conversion of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin using an organic solvent Response of aromatic Rosa grass to different proportions of fly ash and vermicompost Microwave-assisted pyrolysis of biomass waste for production of high-quality biochar: Corn stover and hemp stem case studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1