用于磁共振胰胆管造影的改良呼吸触发 SPACE 序列

IF 1.8 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Radiology Open Pub Date : 2024-04-20 DOI:10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100564
Dayong Jin , Xin Li , Yifan Qian, Yanqiang Qiao, Liyao Liu, Juan Tian, Lei Wang, Yongli Ma, Yue Qin, Yinhu Zhu
{"title":"用于磁共振胰胆管造影的改良呼吸触发 SPACE 序列","authors":"Dayong Jin ,&nbsp;Xin Li ,&nbsp;Yifan Qian,&nbsp;Yanqiang Qiao,&nbsp;Liyao Liu,&nbsp;Juan Tian,&nbsp;Lei Wang,&nbsp;Yongli Ma,&nbsp;Yue Qin,&nbsp;Yinhu Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Respiratory-triggered (RT) and breath-hold are the most common acquisition modalities for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). The present study compared the three different acquisition modalities for optimizing the use of MRCP in patients with diseases of the pancreatic and biliary systems.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Three MRCP acquisition modalities were used in this study: conventional respiratory-triggered sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip evolutions (RT-SPACE), modified RT-SPACE, and breath-hold (BH)-SPACE. Fifty-eight patients with clinically suspected pancreatic and biliary system disease were included. All image data were acquired on a 1.5 T MR. Scan time and image quality were compared between the three acquisition modalities. Friedman test, which was followed by post-hoc analysis, was performed among triple-scan protocol.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was a significant difference in the mean acquisition time among conventional RT-SPACE, modified RT-SPACE, and BH-SPACE (167.41±32.11 seconds vs 50.84±73.78 seconds vs 18.00 seconds, <em>P</em> &lt;0.001). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were also significantly different among the three groups (<em>P</em> &lt;0.001). The SNR and CNR were higher in the RT-SPACE group than in the BH-SPACE group (<em>P</em> &lt;0.05). However, there were no statistically significant differences (<em>P</em> &gt;0.05) among the 3 groups regarding quality of overall image, image clarity, background inhibition, and visualization of the pancreatic and biliary system.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>MRCP acquisition with the modified RT-SPACE sequence greatly shortens the acquisition time with comparable quality images. The MRCP acquisition modality could be designed based on the patient's situation to improve the examination pass rate and obtain excellent images for diagnosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38076,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000194/pdfft?md5=8f0fdf9ade75eed9c21ff5242b0a3319&pid=1-s2.0-S2352047724000194-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modified respiratory-triggered SPACE sequences for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography\",\"authors\":\"Dayong Jin ,&nbsp;Xin Li ,&nbsp;Yifan Qian,&nbsp;Yanqiang Qiao,&nbsp;Liyao Liu,&nbsp;Juan Tian,&nbsp;Lei Wang,&nbsp;Yongli Ma,&nbsp;Yue Qin,&nbsp;Yinhu Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Respiratory-triggered (RT) and breath-hold are the most common acquisition modalities for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). The present study compared the three different acquisition modalities for optimizing the use of MRCP in patients with diseases of the pancreatic and biliary systems.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Three MRCP acquisition modalities were used in this study: conventional respiratory-triggered sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip evolutions (RT-SPACE), modified RT-SPACE, and breath-hold (BH)-SPACE. Fifty-eight patients with clinically suspected pancreatic and biliary system disease were included. All image data were acquired on a 1.5 T MR. Scan time and image quality were compared between the three acquisition modalities. Friedman test, which was followed by post-hoc analysis, was performed among triple-scan protocol.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was a significant difference in the mean acquisition time among conventional RT-SPACE, modified RT-SPACE, and BH-SPACE (167.41±32.11 seconds vs 50.84±73.78 seconds vs 18.00 seconds, <em>P</em> &lt;0.001). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were also significantly different among the three groups (<em>P</em> &lt;0.001). The SNR and CNR were higher in the RT-SPACE group than in the BH-SPACE group (<em>P</em> &lt;0.05). However, there were no statistically significant differences (<em>P</em> &gt;0.05) among the 3 groups regarding quality of overall image, image clarity, background inhibition, and visualization of the pancreatic and biliary system.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>MRCP acquisition with the modified RT-SPACE sequence greatly shortens the acquisition time with comparable quality images. The MRCP acquisition modality could be designed based on the patient's situation to improve the examination pass rate and obtain excellent images for diagnosis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000194/pdfft?md5=8f0fdf9ade75eed9c21ff5242b0a3319&pid=1-s2.0-S2352047724000194-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景吸气触发(RT)和屏气是磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)最常用的采集模式。本研究比较了三种不同的采集模式,以优化 MRCP 在胰腺和胆道系统疾病患者中的应用。材料和方法本研究使用了三种 MRCP 采集模式:传统的呼吸触发采样完善模式,并使用不同的翻转演化(RT-SPACE)进行应用优化对比度;改良的 RT-SPACE 和屏气(BH)-SPACE。研究对象包括 58 名临床疑似胰腺和胆道系统疾病患者。所有图像数据均通过 1.5 T MR 采集。比较了三种采集模式的扫描时间和图像质量。结果传统 RT-SPACE、改良 RT-SPACE 和 BH-SPACE 的平均采集时间有显著差异(167.41±32.11 秒 vs 50.84±73.78 秒 vs 18.00 秒,P <0.001)。三组的信噪比(SNR)和对比度-信噪比(CNR)也有显著差异(P <0.001)。RT-SPACE 组的 SNR 和 CNR 均高于 BH-SPACE 组(P <0.05)。结论使用改良的 RT-SPACE 序列进行 MRCP 采集大大缩短了采集时间,但图像质量相当。可以根据患者的情况设计 MRCP 采集模式,以提高检查通过率,获得优质的诊断图像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modified respiratory-triggered SPACE sequences for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography

Background

Respiratory-triggered (RT) and breath-hold are the most common acquisition modalities for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). The present study compared the three different acquisition modalities for optimizing the use of MRCP in patients with diseases of the pancreatic and biliary systems.

Materials and methods

Three MRCP acquisition modalities were used in this study: conventional respiratory-triggered sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip evolutions (RT-SPACE), modified RT-SPACE, and breath-hold (BH)-SPACE. Fifty-eight patients with clinically suspected pancreatic and biliary system disease were included. All image data were acquired on a 1.5 T MR. Scan time and image quality were compared between the three acquisition modalities. Friedman test, which was followed by post-hoc analysis, was performed among triple-scan protocol.

Results

There was a significant difference in the mean acquisition time among conventional RT-SPACE, modified RT-SPACE, and BH-SPACE (167.41±32.11 seconds vs 50.84±73.78 seconds vs 18.00 seconds, P <0.001). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were also significantly different among the three groups (P <0.001). The SNR and CNR were higher in the RT-SPACE group than in the BH-SPACE group (P <0.05). However, there were no statistically significant differences (P >0.05) among the 3 groups regarding quality of overall image, image clarity, background inhibition, and visualization of the pancreatic and biliary system.

Conclusions

MRCP acquisition with the modified RT-SPACE sequence greatly shortens the acquisition time with comparable quality images. The MRCP acquisition modality could be designed based on the patient's situation to improve the examination pass rate and obtain excellent images for diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Radiology Open
European Journal of Radiology Open Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
51 days
期刊最新文献
Deep learning model for diagnosis of thyroid nodules with size less than 1 cm: A multicenter, retrospective study MRI-based radiomics machine learning model to differentiate non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma from benign renal tumors Post-deployment performance of a deep learning algorithm for normal and abnormal chest X-ray classification: A study at visa screening centers in the United Arab Emirates Study on the classification of benign and malignant breast lesions using a multi-sequence breast MRI fusion radiomics and deep learning model True cost estimation of common imaging procedures for cost-effectiveness analysis - insights from a Singapore hospital emergency department
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1