基于实例的 XAI 对神经网络的信任、理解和性能的影响

IF 5.3 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS International Journal of Human-Computer Studies Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103277
Maya Perlmutter, Ryan Gifford, Samantha Krening
{"title":"基于实例的 XAI 对神经网络的信任、理解和性能的影响","authors":"Maya Perlmutter,&nbsp;Ryan Gifford,&nbsp;Samantha Krening","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of an example-based explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) interface on trust, understanding, and performance in highly-technical populations. XAI studies often focus on general users in low-risk domains. This study examined the impact of showing the closest matches from the training data from two classes on trust, understanding, and performance for highly-technical users in a high-risk domain. We found that providing example-based explanations significantly increased trust and understanding without decreasing performance. Showing the most similar examples from two classes increased trust more than showing examples from only one class. Participants did not treat different classes the same. The most important features for predicting how well an interface was understood were the helpfulness of the provided examples and the person's trust in the human-machine team. We found priming of highly-technical participants to be particularly important for running XAI studies to mitigate the fear of their jobs being impacted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54955,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 103277"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of example-based XAI for neural networks on trust, understanding, and performance\",\"authors\":\"Maya Perlmutter,&nbsp;Ryan Gifford,&nbsp;Samantha Krening\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of an example-based explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) interface on trust, understanding, and performance in highly-technical populations. XAI studies often focus on general users in low-risk domains. This study examined the impact of showing the closest matches from the training data from two classes on trust, understanding, and performance for highly-technical users in a high-risk domain. We found that providing example-based explanations significantly increased trust and understanding without decreasing performance. Showing the most similar examples from two classes increased trust more than showing examples from only one class. Participants did not treat different classes the same. The most important features for predicting how well an interface was understood were the helpfulness of the provided examples and the person's trust in the human-machine team. We found priming of highly-technical participants to be particularly important for running XAI studies to mitigate the fear of their jobs being impacted.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies\",\"volume\":\"188 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071581924000612\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071581924000612","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在考察基于示例的可解释人工智能(XAI)界面对高技术人群的信任、理解和绩效的影响。XAI 研究通常侧重于低风险领域的普通用户。本研究考察了在高风险领域中,显示来自两个类别的训练数据中最接近的匹配结果对高技术用户的信任、理解和表现的影响。我们发现,提供基于示例的解释能显著提高信任度和理解力,而不会降低绩效。展示两个类别中最相似的示例比只展示一个类别的示例更能提高信任度。参与者对待不同类别的态度并不相同。预测界面理解程度的最重要特征是所提供示例的有用性和参与者对人机团队的信任度。我们发现,在进行 XAI 研究时,对高技术参与者进行引导尤其重要,这样可以减轻他们对工作受到影响的恐惧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of example-based XAI for neural networks on trust, understanding, and performance

The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of an example-based explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) interface on trust, understanding, and performance in highly-technical populations. XAI studies often focus on general users in low-risk domains. This study examined the impact of showing the closest matches from the training data from two classes on trust, understanding, and performance for highly-technical users in a high-risk domain. We found that providing example-based explanations significantly increased trust and understanding without decreasing performance. Showing the most similar examples from two classes increased trust more than showing examples from only one class. Participants did not treat different classes the same. The most important features for predicting how well an interface was understood were the helpfulness of the provided examples and the person's trust in the human-machine team. We found priming of highly-technical participants to be particularly important for running XAI studies to mitigate the fear of their jobs being impacted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 工程技术-计算机:控制论
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Human-Computer Studies publishes original research over the whole spectrum of work relevant to the theory and practice of innovative interactive systems. The journal is inherently interdisciplinary, covering research in computing, artificial intelligence, psychology, linguistics, communication, design, engineering, and social organization, which is relevant to the design, analysis, evaluation and application of innovative interactive systems. Papers at the boundaries of these disciplines are especially welcome, as it is our view that interdisciplinary approaches are needed for producing theoretical insights in this complex area and for effective deployment of innovative technologies in concrete user communities. Research areas relevant to the journal include, but are not limited to: • Innovative interaction techniques • Multimodal interaction • Speech interaction • Graphic interaction • Natural language interaction • Interaction in mobile and embedded systems • Interface design and evaluation methodologies • Design and evaluation of innovative interactive systems • User interface prototyping and management systems • Ubiquitous computing • Wearable computers • Pervasive computing • Affective computing • Empirical studies of user behaviour • Empirical studies of programming and software engineering • Computer supported cooperative work • Computer mediated communication • Virtual reality • Mixed and augmented Reality • Intelligent user interfaces • Presence ...
期刊最新文献
Breaking down barriers: A new approach to virtual museum navigation for people with visual impairments through voice assistants Integrating augmented reality and LLM for enhanced cognitive support in critical audio communications ChatGPT and me: First-time and experienced users’ perceptions of ChatGPT’s communicative ability as a dialogue partner Traceable teleportation: Improving spatial learning in virtual locomotion Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1