首页 > 最新文献

International Journal of Human-Computer Studies最新文献

英文 中文
Robust bias mitigation using dual contrastive learning based text style transfer 基于双重对比学习的文本风格迁移的稳健偏见缓解
IF 5.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103748
Osama Subhani Khan, Naima Iltaf, Usman Zia
Text Style Transfer (TST) is a natural language processing (NLP) task involving the modification of textual style while upholding semantic content integrity. Current approaches mostly rely on the sentiment transfer task which involves modifying negative customer reviews to positive and vice versa. While this is important for evaluating the style modification and semantic consistency of TST systems, the application of such a task is questionable. TST has the potential to mitigate bias in real time comments. However, research in bias mitigation using TST is scarce in the literature. Current challenges faced by established frameworks include the maintenance of consistency and coherence when confronted with limited and noisy data especially when it comes to bias mitigation. Furthermore, performance is impeded by the scarcity of ample data necessary for data-driven AI frameworks. This research introduces a framework leveraging contrastive learning to transform dispersed input points into an embedding space. A triplet loss, augmented by an enhanced dual contrastive loss, is employed to distinguish between styles. We propose joint training of the masked language model with two dual contrastive style detectors and a sequence editor aimed at preserving content and modifying style simultaneously. Our model demonstrates a significant enhancement over existing baseline systems, attributing its success to the incorporation of dual contrastive learning with masked language modeling. Experimental results showcase the superior performance of the proposed system when compared to state-of-the-art models, as validated on two benchmark datasets through a series of experiments.
文本风格迁移(TST)是一项自然语言处理(NLP)任务,涉及在保持语义内容完整性的同时修改文本风格。目前的方法主要依赖于情绪转移任务,包括将负面的客户评论修改为积极的,反之亦然。虽然这对于评估TST系统的风格修改和语义一致性很重要,但这种任务的应用是值得怀疑的。TST有可能减轻实时评论中的偏见。然而,文献中使用TST减轻偏倚的研究很少。现有框架目前面临的挑战包括在面对有限和嘈杂的数据时保持一致性和一致性,特别是在减少偏见方面。此外,由于缺乏数据驱动的人工智能框架所需的充足数据,性能受到阻碍。本研究引入了一种利用对比学习的框架,将分散的输入点转换为嵌入空间。三连音损失,增强的双重对比损失,是用来区分风格。我们提出用两个双重对比风格检测器和一个序列编辑器来联合训练掩蔽语言模型,目的是同时保留内容和修改风格。我们的模型比现有的基线系统有了显著的增强,将其成功归因于将双重对比学习与掩蔽语言建模相结合。实验结果表明,与最先进的模型相比,所提出的系统具有优越的性能,并通过一系列实验在两个基准数据集上进行了验证。
{"title":"Robust bias mitigation using dual contrastive learning based text style transfer","authors":"Osama Subhani Khan,&nbsp;Naima Iltaf,&nbsp;Usman Zia","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103748","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103748","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Text Style Transfer (TST) is a natural language processing (NLP) task involving the modification of textual style while upholding semantic content integrity. Current approaches mostly rely on the sentiment transfer task which involves modifying negative customer reviews to positive and vice versa. While this is important for evaluating the style modification and semantic consistency of TST systems, the application of such a task is questionable. TST has the potential to mitigate bias in real time comments. However, research in bias mitigation using TST is scarce in the literature. Current challenges faced by established frameworks include the maintenance of consistency and coherence when confronted with limited and noisy data especially when it comes to bias mitigation. Furthermore, performance is impeded by the scarcity of ample data necessary for data-driven AI frameworks. This research introduces a framework leveraging contrastive learning to transform dispersed input points into an embedding space. A triplet loss, augmented by an enhanced dual contrastive loss, is employed to distinguish between styles. We propose joint training of the masked language model with two dual contrastive style detectors and a sequence editor aimed at preserving content and modifying style simultaneously. Our model demonstrates a significant enhancement over existing baseline systems, attributing its success to the incorporation of dual contrastive learning with masked language modeling. Experimental results showcase the superior performance of the proposed system when compared to state-of-the-art models, as validated on two benchmark datasets through a series of experiments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54955,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 103748"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078777","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From movement to learning: Leveraging VR behavioral metrics to evaluate cognitive load and curiosity 从运动到学习:利用VR行为指标来评估认知负荷和好奇心
IF 5.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103751
Matisse Poupard , Florian Larrue , Martin Bertrand , Dominique Liguoro , Hélène Sauzéon , André Tricot
Virtual Reality (VR) is increasingly used in education due to its immersive and interactive capabilities, but its impact on cognitive load and curiosity remains underexplored, particularly regarding real-time behavioral indicators of cognitive load and curiosity. This study investigates how VR behavioral metrics, specifically hand and head movement patterns, can serve as objective, synchronous indicators of cognitive engagement and intrinsic motivation. A controlled experiment was conducted with 125 medical students, who engaged in a neuroanatomy learning task within a VR environment featuring varying levels of interactivity. Behavioral data, including movement entropy, exploration patterns, and gesture dynamics, were analyzed in relation to self-reported measures of cognitive load, motivation, and engagement. Results indicate that while greater hand movement was associated with lower intrinsic motivation, higher head movement correlated positively with germane cognitive load and intrinsic motivation, implying deeper cognitive engagement. Additionally, movement entropy emerged as a predictor of curiosity-driven learning, suggesting its potential as an indicator of learning behaviors in VR environments. These findings contribute to a better understanding of how behavioral data can complement traditional assessments of learning experiences in VR. They also highlight the need for further research into integrating movement-based metrics with instructional design to support engagement and learning.
虚拟现实(VR)由于其身临其境和互动的能力而越来越多地应用于教育中,但其对认知负荷和好奇心的影响仍未得到充分探索,特别是在认知负荷和好奇心的实时行为指标方面。本研究探讨了VR行为指标,特别是手和头的运动模式,如何作为认知参与和内在动机的客观、同步指标。研究人员对125名医学生进行了一项对照实验,他们在具有不同交互性水平的VR环境中参与神经解剖学学习任务。行为数据,包括运动熵、探索模式和手势动力学,与自我报告的认知负荷、动机和参与度相关。研究结果表明,手部运动越多,内在动机越低,而头部运动越多,认知负荷和内在动机就越高,这意味着认知参与程度越高。此外,运动熵是好奇心驱动学习的预测指标,这表明它有可能成为VR环境中学习行为的指标。这些发现有助于更好地理解行为数据如何补充VR学习体验的传统评估。他们还强调,需要进一步研究如何将基于动作的指标与教学设计相结合,以支持参与和学习。
{"title":"From movement to learning: Leveraging VR behavioral metrics to evaluate cognitive load and curiosity","authors":"Matisse Poupard ,&nbsp;Florian Larrue ,&nbsp;Martin Bertrand ,&nbsp;Dominique Liguoro ,&nbsp;Hélène Sauzéon ,&nbsp;André Tricot","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103751","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103751","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Virtual Reality (VR) is increasingly used in education due to its immersive and interactive capabilities, but its impact on cognitive load and curiosity remains underexplored, particularly regarding real-time behavioral indicators of cognitive load and curiosity. This study investigates how VR behavioral metrics, specifically hand and head movement patterns, can serve as objective, synchronous indicators of cognitive engagement and intrinsic motivation. A controlled experiment was conducted with 125 medical students, who engaged in a neuroanatomy learning task within a VR environment featuring varying levels of interactivity. Behavioral data, including movement entropy, exploration patterns, and gesture dynamics, were analyzed in relation to self-reported measures of cognitive load, motivation, and engagement. Results indicate that while greater hand movement was associated with lower intrinsic motivation, higher head movement correlated positively with germane cognitive load and intrinsic motivation, implying deeper cognitive engagement. Additionally, movement entropy emerged as a predictor of curiosity-driven learning, suggesting its potential as an indicator of learning behaviors in VR environments. These findings contribute to a better understanding of how behavioral data can complement traditional assessments of learning experiences in VR. They also highlight the need for further research into integrating movement-based metrics with instructional design to support engagement and learning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54955,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 103751"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146078778","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cognitive and emotional engagement design factors in text-based pedagogical conversational agents: Impacts on student learning and motivation 基于文本的教学会话代理的认知和情感投入设计因素:对学生学习和动机的影响
IF 5.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS Pub Date : 2026-01-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103750
Sunhyo Oh , Taejun Park , Gahgene Gweon
Text-based pedagogical conversational agents (PCA) can encourage students’ engagement via natural conversations and have become increasingly prevalent in educational contexts. In this study, we explored how cognitive and emotional engagement can support learning achievement and five dimensions of intrinsic motivation. We conducted two between-subjects studies with 170 sixth-grade students using GeomBot, a text-based PCA. Our experimental results showed that for cognitive engagement, students presented with the constructive mode, compared to the active mode, showed a greater learning achievement, and interest-enjoyment. Emotional engagement was examined in terms of agent warmth and competency. Specifically, we observed higher learning achievement and interest-enjoyment when interacting with a high-warmth GeomBot while students who interacted with a high-competency GeomBot showed higher interest-enjoyment. Significant interaction effects between learning mode and agent warmth level were observed for learning achievement, interest-enjoyment, and tension-pressure, while no significant interaction effect was observed between learning mode and agent competency level.
基于文本的教学会话代理(PCA)可以通过自然对话鼓励学生参与,并且在教育环境中越来越普遍。在本研究中,我们探讨了认知和情感投入如何支持学习成就和内在动机的五个维度。我们使用基于文本的PCA工具GeomBot对170名六年级学生进行了两项受试者间研究。我们的实验结果表明,在认知投入方面,建设性模式下的学生比主动模式下的学生表现出更高的学习成就和兴趣享受。情感投入是根据代理人的热情和能力来检验的。具体来说,我们观察到与高热情的GeomBot互动时,学生的学习成绩和兴趣享受更高,而与高能力的GeomBot互动的学生表现出更高的兴趣享受。学习模式与主体温暖水平在学习成就、兴趣享受和紧张压力方面存在显著交互作用,而学习模式与主体胜任力水平之间无显著交互作用。
{"title":"Cognitive and emotional engagement design factors in text-based pedagogical conversational agents: Impacts on student learning and motivation","authors":"Sunhyo Oh ,&nbsp;Taejun Park ,&nbsp;Gahgene Gweon","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103750","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103750","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Text-based pedagogical conversational agents (PCA) can encourage students’ engagement via natural conversations and have become increasingly prevalent in educational contexts. In this study, we explored how cognitive and emotional engagement can support learning achievement and five dimensions of intrinsic motivation. We conducted two between-subjects studies with 170 sixth-grade students using GeomBot, a text-based PCA. Our experimental results showed that for cognitive engagement, students presented with the constructive mode, compared to the active mode, showed a greater learning achievement, and interest-enjoyment. Emotional engagement was examined in terms of agent warmth and competency. Specifically, we observed higher learning achievement and interest-enjoyment when interacting with a high-warmth GeomBot while students who interacted with a high-competency GeomBot showed higher interest-enjoyment. Significant interaction effects between learning mode and agent warmth level were observed for learning achievement, interest-enjoyment, and tension-pressure, while no significant interaction effect was observed between learning mode and agent competency level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54955,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 103750"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146102916","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is AI a good fit? The impact of personality on generative AI collaboration and enjoyment 人工智能合适吗?个性对生成AI协作和乐趣的影响
IF 5.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS Pub Date : 2026-01-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103747
Anna Kovbasiuk , Tamilla Triantoro , Leon Ciechanowski , Konrad Sowa , Aleksandra Przegalinska
As generative AI becomes a common collaborator in the workplace, understanding the psychological factors driving its adoption becomes essential. This study examines how Big Five personality traits shape the user experience and intention to use AI. In an experiment with 59 participants, we compared a group collaborating with an AI chatbot against a control group working alone on business-related tasks. We found that for those working with AI, personality traits such as extraversion and agreeableness significantly enhanced their enjoyment of the task. Importantly, this positive experience did not directly translate into a higher intention to use the technology. Instead, the main contribution of enjoyment was building trust towards technology. Trust acted as the necessary bridge, converting the hedonic benefit of enjoyment into a greater willingness to adopt AI for future use. Our results suggest that the path to successful AI adoption in the workplace depends on more than a positive first impression; it requires building a foundation of trust.
随着生成式人工智能成为工作场所的共同合作者,了解推动其采用的心理因素变得至关重要。本研究考察了五大人格特征如何影响用户体验和使用人工智能的意图。在一项有59名参与者的实验中,我们将一组与人工智能聊天机器人合作的小组与单独处理业务相关任务的对照组进行了比较。我们发现,对于那些与人工智能一起工作的人来说,外向性和亲和性等性格特征显著提高了他们对任务的享受程度。重要的是,这种积极的体验并没有直接转化为使用该技术的更高意愿。相反,乐趣的主要贡献是建立对技术的信任。信任充当了必要的桥梁,将享受的享乐利益转化为更愿意采用人工智能以供未来使用。我们的研究结果表明,在工作场所成功采用人工智能的途径不仅仅取决于积极的第一印象;这需要建立信任的基础。
{"title":"Is AI a good fit? The impact of personality on generative AI collaboration and enjoyment","authors":"Anna Kovbasiuk ,&nbsp;Tamilla Triantoro ,&nbsp;Leon Ciechanowski ,&nbsp;Konrad Sowa ,&nbsp;Aleksandra Przegalinska","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103747","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103747","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As generative AI becomes a common collaborator in the workplace, understanding the psychological factors driving its adoption becomes essential. This study examines how Big Five personality traits shape the user experience and intention to use AI. In an experiment with 59 participants, we compared a group collaborating with an AI chatbot against a control group working alone on business-related tasks. We found that for those working with AI, personality traits such as extraversion and agreeableness significantly enhanced their enjoyment of the task. Importantly, this positive experience did not directly translate into a higher intention to use the technology. Instead, the main contribution of enjoyment was building trust towards technology. Trust acted as the necessary bridge, converting the hedonic benefit of enjoyment into a greater willingness to adopt AI for future use. Our results suggest that the path to successful AI adoption in the workplace depends on more than a positive first impression; it requires building a foundation of trust.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54955,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 103747"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146102913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The privacy triad: Understanding the influence of perceived social agency on privacy attitudes 隐私三位一体:了解感知社会代理对隐私态度的影响
IF 5.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS Pub Date : 2026-01-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103752
Maxwell Keleher, Khadija Baig, Sonia Chiasson
The Computers Are Social Actors (CASA) paradigm proposes that users’ interactions with computers follow the same social psychology principles as their interactions with people. CASA has potential value in guiding privacy design and research, but this has never been explicitly studied. To investigate how CASA may affect users’ privacy attitudes towards computers, smartphones, and digital assistants, we conducted a two-part investigation. First, we surveyed 400 participants. We identified that CASA is relevant in some, but not all, privacy contexts. Next, we interviewed 12 participants using Grounded Theory methods to understand to what extent CASA shaped their privacy attitudes. Overall, our study revealed that CASA by itself is insufficient to explain users’ privacy attitudes. Interpreting our results, we propose the Privacy Triad: users either consider their device to be a social agent, a conduit for outside actors, or a tool over which they have full control. These roles impact users’ privacy attitudes and expectations towards the device. We describe the practical applications of the Privacy Triad for designers. The triad can help designers implement privacy systems and technologies that foster interactions that naturally align with users’ expectations. It can also help designers think through potential risks arising from these interactions (e.g., phishing or inadvertent privacy disclosures).
计算机是社会行动者(CASA)范式提出,用户与计算机的交互遵循与他们与人的交互相同的社会心理学原则。CASA在指导隐私设计和研究方面具有潜在的价值,但这一点从未得到明确的研究。为了调查CASA如何影响用户对电脑、智能手机和数字助理的隐私态度,我们进行了两部分的调查。首先,我们调查了400名参与者。我们发现CASA在某些(但不是全部)隐私环境中是相关的。接下来,我们使用扎根理论方法采访了12名参与者,以了解CASA在多大程度上影响了他们的隐私态度。总的来说,我们的研究表明,CASA本身不足以解释用户的隐私态度。为了解释我们的研究结果,我们提出了隐私三要素:用户要么认为他们的设备是一个社交代理,一个外部参与者的渠道,要么是一个他们完全控制的工具。这些角色影响着用户对隐私的态度和对设备的期望。我们为设计人员描述了隐私三合一的实际应用。这三者可以帮助设计师实现隐私系统和技术,促进与用户期望自然一致的交互。它还可以帮助设计师思考这些交互产生的潜在风险(例如,网络钓鱼或无意的隐私泄露)。
{"title":"The privacy triad: Understanding the influence of perceived social agency on privacy attitudes","authors":"Maxwell Keleher,&nbsp;Khadija Baig,&nbsp;Sonia Chiasson","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103752","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103752","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Computers Are Social Actors (CASA) paradigm proposes that users’ interactions with computers follow the same social psychology principles as their interactions with people. CASA has potential value in guiding privacy design and research, but this has never been explicitly studied. To investigate how CASA may affect users’ privacy attitudes towards computers, smartphones, and digital assistants, we conducted a two-part investigation. First, we surveyed 400 participants. We identified that CASA is relevant in some, but not all, privacy contexts. Next, we interviewed 12 participants using Grounded Theory methods to understand to what extent CASA shaped their privacy attitudes. Overall, our study revealed that CASA by itself is insufficient to explain users’ privacy attitudes. Interpreting our results, we propose the Privacy Triad: users either consider their device to be a <em>social agent</em>, a <em>conduit</em> for outside actors, or a <em>tool</em> over which they have full control. These roles impact users’ privacy attitudes and expectations towards the device. We describe the practical applications of the Privacy Triad for designers. The triad can help designers implement privacy systems and technologies that foster interactions that naturally align with users’ expectations. It can also help designers think through potential risks arising from these interactions (e.g., phishing or inadvertent privacy disclosures).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54955,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 103752"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146102912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Detection of social connectedness in everyday life via multimodal lifelogging data 通过多模态生活记录数据检测日常生活中的社会联系
IF 5.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103749
Chelsea Dobbins , Stephen Fairclough , Catherine Haslam , S. Alexander Haslam , Sarah Bentley
Loneliness, low mood, and social disconnection can have damaging effects on physical and mental health. Detecting these emotions in the context of everyday life is important as these psychological states can manifest differently outside the laboratory. Lifelogging and quantified self technologies, including wearable devices, offer an approach to continuously monitor physiological signals in the real-world. However, little work has been undertaken with these devices to detect social connection in everyday life. This paper presents a study that leveraged machine learning to infer mood and social connectedness in everyday life using multimodal lifelogging data collected via a wrist-worn wearable device. Fifty participants were supplied with a wearable device and smartphone that collected physiological and subjective data across two consecutive weekdays as they went about their daily lives. The analysis examined physiological correlates between a person’s psychological perceptions of general connectedness, as well as feelings of in-the-moment social connection to people within an estimated 5 m vicinity and mood at specific timepoints using four machine learning classification models – k-Nearest Neighbour, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine and Naïve Bayes. Results demonstrated that Random Forest obtained the highest accuracy of 0.8 – 0.84 for the binary detection of mood and social connection in everyday life.
孤独、情绪低落和与社会脱节会对身心健康造成破坏性影响。在日常生活中检测这些情绪是很重要的,因为这些心理状态在实验室之外会表现出不同的状态。包括可穿戴设备在内的生活记录和量化自我技术,为持续监测现实世界中的生理信号提供了一种方法。然而,很少有人利用这些设备来检测日常生活中的社会联系。本文介绍了一项利用机器学习来推断日常生活中的情绪和社会联系的研究,该研究使用通过腕戴式可穿戴设备收集的多模态生活记录数据。50名参与者配备了可穿戴设备和智能手机,在连续两个工作日内收集他们日常生活中的生理和主观数据。该分析使用四种机器学习分类模型(k-Nearest Neighbour, Random Forest, Support Vector machine和Naïve Bayes),研究了一个人对一般联系的心理感知、与大约5米范围内的人的即时社会联系感受和特定时间点的情绪之间的生理相关性。结果表明,随机森林对日常生活中情绪和社会联系的二元检测准确率最高,为0.8 ~ 0.84。
{"title":"Detection of social connectedness in everyday life via multimodal lifelogging data","authors":"Chelsea Dobbins ,&nbsp;Stephen Fairclough ,&nbsp;Catherine Haslam ,&nbsp;S. Alexander Haslam ,&nbsp;Sarah Bentley","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103749","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103749","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Loneliness, low mood, and social disconnection can have damaging effects on physical and mental health. Detecting these emotions in the context of everyday life is important as these psychological states can manifest differently outside the laboratory. Lifelogging and quantified self technologies, including wearable devices, offer an approach to continuously monitor physiological signals in the real-world. However, little work has been undertaken with these devices to detect social connection in everyday life. This paper presents a study that leveraged machine learning to infer mood and social connectedness in everyday life using multimodal lifelogging data collected via a wrist-worn wearable device. Fifty participants were supplied with a wearable device and smartphone that collected physiological and subjective data across two consecutive weekdays as they went about their daily lives. The analysis examined physiological correlates between a person’s psychological perceptions of general connectedness, as well as feelings of in-the-moment social connection to people within an estimated 5 m vicinity and mood at specific timepoints using four machine learning classification models – k-Nearest Neighbour, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine and Naïve Bayes. Results demonstrated that Random Forest obtained the highest accuracy of 0.8 – 0.84 for the binary detection of mood and social connection in everyday life.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54955,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 103749"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146038688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
When trust collides: Exploring human-LLM cooperation intention through the prisoner’s dilemma 当信任发生冲突:基于囚徒困境的人-法学硕士合作意向探究
IF 5.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103740
Guanxuan Jiang , Shirao Yang , Yuyang Wang , Pan Hui
Large language models (LLMs) are advancing rapidly, equipping artificial intelligence (AI) agents with stronger reasoning and decision-making capacities. AI agents are moving from passive tools to more adaptive collaborators. However, the black-box nature and hallucinations of LLMs create uncertainties about their outputs, which may impact user trust in scenarios involving human-LLM collaboration and, in turn, lead to inconsistent outcomes in mixed-motive scenarios. To investigate how humans adjust their cooperation intentions in response to LLM unpredictability, we conducted repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma games with 30 participants (15 males, 15 females) interacting with LLM agents with different declared identities. Results revealed that an agent’s declared identity, the user’s gender, and their interaction influenced cooperation intentions. The semi-structured interviews further showed that these effects were mediated by gender differences in perceived agent identity and trustworthiness. By moving beyond the predominantly cooperative settings, this study uncovers robust interactions between agent identity and user gender in mixed-motive scenarios. These findings offer practical insights for developing more trustworthy AI systems for real-world problems.
大型语言模型(llm)正在迅速发展,使人工智能(AI)代理具有更强的推理和决策能力。人工智能代理正在从被动的工具转变为更具适应性的合作者。然而,法学硕士的黑箱性质和幻觉造成了其输出的不确定性,这可能会影响用户在涉及人类与法学硕士协作的场景中的信任,进而导致混合动机场景中不一致的结果。为了研究人类如何调整合作意向以应对LLM的不可预测性,我们进行了30名参与者(15名男性,15名女性)与不同身份的LLM代理进行了重复的囚徒困境游戏。结果显示,代理人的身份声明、使用者的性别和他们的互动影响合作意向。半结构化访谈进一步表明,这些影响是由感知代理人身份和可信度的性别差异介导的。通过超越主要的合作设置,本研究揭示了混合动机场景中代理身份和用户性别之间的强大交互作用。这些发现为开发更值得信赖的人工智能系统解决现实问题提供了实用的见解。
{"title":"When trust collides: Exploring human-LLM cooperation intention through the prisoner’s dilemma","authors":"Guanxuan Jiang ,&nbsp;Shirao Yang ,&nbsp;Yuyang Wang ,&nbsp;Pan Hui","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103740","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103740","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Large language models (LLMs) are advancing rapidly, equipping artificial intelligence (AI) agents with stronger reasoning and decision-making capacities. AI agents are moving from passive tools to more adaptive collaborators. However, the black-box nature and hallucinations of LLMs create uncertainties about their outputs, which may impact user trust in scenarios involving human-LLM collaboration and, in turn, lead to inconsistent outcomes in mixed-motive scenarios. To investigate how humans adjust their cooperation intentions in response to LLM unpredictability, we conducted repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma games with 30 participants (15 males, 15 females) interacting with LLM agents with different declared identities. Results revealed that an agent’s declared identity, the user’s gender, and their interaction influenced cooperation intentions. The semi-structured interviews further showed that these effects were mediated by gender differences in perceived agent identity and trustworthiness. By moving beyond the predominantly cooperative settings, this study uncovers robust interactions between agent identity and user gender in mixed-motive scenarios. These findings offer practical insights for developing more trustworthy AI systems for real-world problems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54955,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 103740"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146038691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Critical reflections on user studies’ evaluation methods for group recommender systems 对群组推荐系统中用户研究评价方法的批判性思考
IF 5.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103742
Francesco Barile, Pierre Hurlin, Cedric Waterschoot, Nava Tintarev
Social choice-based aggregation strategies are often used in group recommender systems to aggregate individual preferences or recommendations. However, previous works evaluating group recommenders with user studies found that the diversity of the group members’ preferences impacts the effectiveness of the strategies.
In this paper, we highlight and address the methodological limitations of those previous works. Specifically, the methodologies we introduce demonstrate the following three novelties: 1) We evaluated the strategies from the viewpoint of an “internal evaluator”; 2) We introduced a novel methodology for modeling a fictional but realistic group with specific preference profiles for the group members, defining scenarios with concrete users and items, that are still mapped to specific group configurations; 3) We evaluated the understanding of the participants, by measuring how well they can successfully apply the aggregation strategy to a new scenario.
To do this we performed a randomized controlled trial (n=444) using a mixed design with two between-subject factors (the used aggregation strategy and the presented explanation type), and a within-subject factor (the group configuration). Our results, with friend groups, showed significant differences in the effectiveness of the aggregation strategies depending on the specific group configuration (i.e., depending on the internal diversity of group members’ preferences), with noticeable differences between evaluations of what is good for the group – external evaluation – and what is good for the participant – internal evaluation. We conclude with methodological implications for group recommender systems.
基于社会选择的聚合策略通常用于群体推荐系统中,以聚合个人偏好或推荐。然而,先前用用户研究评估群体推荐的研究发现,群体成员偏好的多样性会影响策略的有效性。在本文中,我们强调并解决了这些先前工作的方法局限性。具体而言,我们介绍的方法展示了以下三个新颖之处:1)我们从“内部评估者”的角度评估战略;2)我们引入了一种新的方法来建模一个虚构但现实的群体,并为群体成员提供特定的偏好配置文件,定义具有具体用户和项目的场景,这些场景仍然映射到特定的群体配置;3)我们通过衡量参与者如何成功地将聚合策略应用于新场景来评估参与者的理解程度。为此,我们进行了一项随机对照试验(n=444),采用混合设计,其中包含两个受试者之间因素(使用的聚合策略和提出的解释类型)和一个受试者内部因素(组配置)。在朋友组中,我们的结果显示,根据特定的群体配置(即,取决于群体成员偏好的内部多样性),聚合策略的有效性存在显著差异,在对群体有利的评估(外部评估)和对参与者有利的评估(内部评估)之间存在显著差异。我们总结了小组推荐系统的方法含义。
{"title":"Critical reflections on user studies’ evaluation methods for group recommender systems","authors":"Francesco Barile,&nbsp;Pierre Hurlin,&nbsp;Cedric Waterschoot,&nbsp;Nava Tintarev","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103742","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103742","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social choice-based aggregation strategies are often used in group recommender systems to aggregate individual preferences or recommendations. However, previous works evaluating group recommenders with user studies found that the diversity of the group members’ preferences impacts the effectiveness of the strategies.</div><div>In this paper, we highlight and address the methodological limitations of those previous works. Specifically, the methodologies we introduce demonstrate the following three novelties: <strong>1)</strong> We evaluated the strategies from the viewpoint of an “internal evaluator”; <strong>2)</strong> We introduced a novel methodology for modeling a fictional but realistic group with specific preference profiles for the group members, defining scenarios with concrete users and items, that are still mapped to specific group configurations; <strong>3)</strong> We evaluated the understanding of the participants, by measuring how well they can successfully apply the aggregation strategy to a new scenario.</div><div>To do this we performed a randomized controlled trial (n=444) using a mixed design with two between-subject factors (the used <strong>aggregation strategy</strong> and the presented <strong>explanation type</strong>), and a within-subject factor (the <strong>group configuration</strong>). Our results, with friend groups, showed significant differences in the effectiveness of the aggregation strategies depending on the specific <em>group configuration</em> (i.e., depending on the internal diversity of group members’ preferences), with noticeable differences between evaluations of what is good for the group – <em>external evaluation</em> – and what is good for the participant – <em>internal evaluation</em>. We conclude with methodological implications for group recommender systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54955,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 103742"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146038683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Voice interaction under cognitive load: Non-verbal auditory inputs for automated vehicles 认知负荷下的语音交互:自动驾驶车辆的非语言听觉输入
IF 5.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103746
Yijiao Yang, Chenwen Lin, Xu Sun, Qingfeng Wang
In automated vehicles (AVs), the driver’s dual role as system supervisor and participant in Non-Driving Related Activities (NDRAs) poses a critical human-computer interaction challenge by competing for limited cognitive resources. While large language models have substantially advanced the semantic understanding of voice interaction, the mechanism aspect of how users initiate, maintain, and terminate commands remain underexplored in terms of usability and safety. To address this, our research systematically investigates Non-Verbal Auditory Inputs (NVAIs) and their integration with speech across a three-part experimental study. It progressed from foundational activation feasibility (Experiment 1, N = 20) and single-task performance evaluation (Experiment 2, N = 35) to quantifying cognitive interference within a dual-task driving simulator (Experiment 3, N = 38). Our findings reveal critical trade-offs across the interaction stages. For activation (Experiment 1), users preferred the reliability of traditional wake-up words, whereas NVAIs received higher hedonic ratings but raised accessibility concerns. For continuous control (Experiment 2 and Experiment 3), a hybrid mechanism using a finger snap to terminate a spoken command significantly enhanced control precision without increasing interference to the primary supervisory task. Conversely, a mechanism mapping control to a sustained vowel extension proved unsuitable due to its high cognitive and physiological costs. In conclusion, these results demonstrate that the choice of input mechanism is critical under cognitive load. NVAIs such as snapping show promise as start-up and stop channels in supervisory AV contexts and motivate adaptive, multimodally redundant in-vehicle systems that better balance efficiency, user comfort, and safety.
在自动驾驶汽车(AVs)中,驾驶员作为系统监督者和非驾驶相关活动(NDRAs)参与者的双重角色,通过竞争有限的认知资源,对人机交互提出了关键的挑战。虽然大型语言模型已经大大提高了对语音交互的语义理解,但用户如何启动、维护和终止命令的机制方面在可用性和安全性方面仍未得到充分探索。为了解决这个问题,我们的研究系统地调查了非语言听觉输入(NVAIs)及其与言语的整合,分为三个部分的实验研究。从基础激活可行性(实验1,N = 20)和单任务性能评估(实验2,N = 35)发展到双任务驾驶模拟器认知干扰量化(实验3,N = 38)。我们的发现揭示了交互阶段的关键权衡。对于激活(实验1),用户更喜欢传统唤醒词的可靠性,而nvai唤醒词获得更高的享乐性评级,但增加了可访问性。对于连续控制(实验2和实验3),使用一种混合机制来终止口头命令,可以显著提高控制精度,而不会增加对主要监督任务的干扰。相反,将控制映射到持续元音延伸的机制由于其高认知和生理成本而被证明是不合适的。综上所述,这些结果表明,在认知负荷下,输入机制的选择至关重要。在自动驾驶汽车的监控环境中,自动驾驶汽车系统(如snap)有望成为启动和停止通道,并激发自适应、多模态冗余的车载系统,更好地平衡效率、用户舒适度和安全性。
{"title":"Voice interaction under cognitive load: Non-verbal auditory inputs for automated vehicles","authors":"Yijiao Yang,&nbsp;Chenwen Lin,&nbsp;Xu Sun,&nbsp;Qingfeng Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103746","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103746","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In automated vehicles (AVs), the driver’s dual role as system supervisor and participant in Non-Driving Related Activities (NDRAs) poses a critical human-computer interaction challenge by competing for limited cognitive resources. While large language models have substantially advanced the semantic understanding of voice interaction, the mechanism aspect of how users initiate, maintain, and terminate commands remain underexplored in terms of usability and safety. To address this, our research systematically investigates Non-Verbal Auditory Inputs (NVAIs) and their integration with speech across a three-part experimental study. It progressed from foundational activation feasibility (Experiment 1, <em>N</em> = 20) and single-task performance evaluation (Experiment 2, <em>N</em> = 35) to quantifying cognitive interference within a dual-task driving simulator (Experiment 3, <em>N</em> = 38). Our findings reveal critical trade-offs across the interaction stages. For activation (Experiment 1), users preferred the reliability of traditional wake-up words, whereas NVAIs received higher hedonic ratings but raised accessibility concerns. For continuous control (Experiment 2 and Experiment 3), a hybrid mechanism using a finger snap to terminate a spoken command significantly enhanced control precision without increasing interference to the primary supervisory task. Conversely, a mechanism mapping control to a sustained vowel extension proved unsuitable due to its high cognitive and physiological costs. In conclusion, these results demonstrate that the choice of input mechanism is critical under cognitive load. NVAIs such as snapping show promise as start-up and stop channels in supervisory AV contexts and motivate adaptive, multimodally redundant in-vehicle systems that better balance efficiency, user comfort, and safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54955,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 103746"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146038689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Are we close enough? Impact of stress management chatbot’s self-disclosure and relationship types on user’s self-disclosure, trust, intimacy, and anonymity 我们够近了吗?压力管理聊天机器人的自我表露和关系类型对用户自我表露、信任、亲密和匿名性的影响
IF 5.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS Pub Date : 2026-01-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103738
Soohyun Yoon, Younah Kang
College students experience elevated stress levels, making AI-based chatbots promising tools for accessible stress management support. For effective stress management interventions, a user’s self-disclosure and trust toward chatbots are critical factors. While prior studies highlight the benefits of self-disclosure to chatbots, it remains unclear how these effects manifest in emotionally sensitive contexts or vary depending on the relationship type established with the chatbot.
The CASA (Computers Are Social Actors) paradigm explains that people apply social rules to computers, while Social Penetration Theory (SPT) emphasizes the reciprocity of self-disclosure in relationship formation. Therefore, this study investigates whether stress management chatbot’s self-disclosure and chatbot-user relationship types influence user’s self-disclosure, trust, anonymity, and intimacy in ways that parallel human-to-human interactions, as suggested by the CASA paradigm.
A 2 × 2 factorial design was employed with the chatbot’s self-disclosure presence and relationship type (mentor or peer) as independent variables. A total of 112 undergraduate students participated in chatbot-mediated stress management sessions, followed by evaluation surveys; after data screening, 100 participants were retained for analysis. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed with 24 participants across four chatbot types.
Results revealed that the chatbot’s self-disclosure had no significant effect on user outcomes. However, relationship type significantly influenced user anonymity and self-disclosure: mentor-relationship chatbots, mimicking more distant professional relationships, provided greater user anonymity, while peer relationship chatbots elicited greater user’s self-disclosure. These findings notably support the CASA paradigm. By integrating qualitative insights with quantitative findings, this study identifies design implications and key factors for developing effective stress management chatbots.
大学生的压力水平不断上升,这使得基于人工智能的聊天机器人有望成为易于获得的压力管理支持工具。对于有效的压力管理干预,用户的自我表露和对聊天机器人的信任是关键因素。虽然之前的研究强调了对聊天机器人自我表露的好处,但目前尚不清楚这些影响在情感敏感的环境中是如何表现出来的,或者是如何根据与聊天机器人建立的关系类型而变化的。CASA (Computers Are Social Actors)范式解释了人们将社会规则应用于计算机,而社会渗透理论(Social Penetration Theory, SPT)则强调在关系形成过程中自我披露的互惠性。因此,本研究考察了压力管理聊天机器人的自我表露和聊天机器人-用户关系类型是否以类似于CASA范式的方式影响用户的自我表露、信任、匿名和亲密关系。采用2 × 2因子设计,以聊天机器人的自我表露存在和关系类型(导师或同伴)为自变量。共有112名本科生参加了聊天机器人介导的压力管理课程,随后进行了评估调查;数据筛选后,保留100名参与者进行分析。对四种聊天机器人类型的24名参与者进行了半结构化访谈并进行了分析。结果显示,聊天机器人的自我表露对用户结果没有显著影响。然而,关系类型显著影响用户匿名性和自我表露:师徒关系聊天机器人,模仿更遥远的职业关系,提供了更大的用户匿名性,而同伴关系聊天机器人引发了更大的用户自我表露。这些发现明显支持CASA范式。通过将定性见解与定量发现相结合,本研究确定了开发有效压力管理聊天机器人的设计含义和关键因素。
{"title":"Are we close enough? Impact of stress management chatbot’s self-disclosure and relationship types on user’s self-disclosure, trust, intimacy, and anonymity","authors":"Soohyun Yoon,&nbsp;Younah Kang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103738","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103738","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>College students experience elevated stress levels, making AI-based chatbots promising tools for accessible stress management support. For effective stress management interventions, a user’s self-disclosure and trust toward chatbots are critical factors. While prior studies highlight the benefits of self-disclosure to chatbots, it remains unclear how these effects manifest in emotionally sensitive contexts or vary depending on the relationship type established with the chatbot.</div><div>The CASA (Computers Are Social Actors) paradigm explains that people apply social rules to computers, while Social Penetration Theory (SPT) emphasizes the reciprocity of self-disclosure in relationship formation. Therefore, this study investigates whether stress management chatbot’s self-disclosure and chatbot-user relationship types influence user’s self-disclosure, trust, anonymity, and intimacy in ways that parallel human-to-human interactions, as suggested by the CASA paradigm.</div><div>A 2 × 2 factorial design was employed with the chatbot’s self-disclosure presence and relationship type (mentor or peer) as independent variables. A total of 112 undergraduate students participated in chatbot-mediated stress management sessions, followed by evaluation surveys; after data screening, 100 participants were retained for analysis. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed with 24 participants across four chatbot types.</div><div>Results revealed that the chatbot’s self-disclosure had no significant effect on user outcomes. However, relationship type significantly influenced user anonymity and self-disclosure: mentor-relationship chatbots, mimicking more distant professional relationships, provided greater user anonymity, while peer relationship chatbots elicited greater user’s self-disclosure. These findings notably support the CASA paradigm. By integrating qualitative insights with quantitative findings, this study identifies design implications and key factors for developing effective stress management chatbots.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54955,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 103738"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146038684","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1