美国男女同性恋、双性恋、变性者和跨性别者因粮食不安全而付出的精神代价

IF 2.6 3区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY Population Research and Policy Review Pub Date : 2024-04-20 DOI:10.1007/s11113-024-09881-8
Danielle Xiaodan Morales
{"title":"美国男女同性恋、双性恋、变性者和跨性别者因粮食不安全而付出的精神代价","authors":"Danielle Xiaodan Morales","doi":"10.1007/s11113-024-09881-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study employs insights from food justice scholarship to develop a theoretical framework aimed at comprehending the intersections of food insecurity and mental health disparities within LGBTQ + populations. The framework is empirically tested and refined, drawing upon data from a nationally representative sample of 63,190 respondents from the 2022 Household Pulse Survey. This sample includes 40% cisgender men, 58% cisgender women, and 2% transgender and gender non-conforming (TGNC) individuals, with 10% identifying as non-heterosexual and 90% as heterosexual. Two distinct pathways are proposed and examined through data analysis. The first pathway reveals that LGBTQ + populations exhibit a higher prevalence of mental health challenges compared to their non-LGBTQ + counterparts. The findings also unveil nuanced mental health dynamics within LGBTQ + communities, with TGNC individuals and bisexual people demonstrating a higher susceptibility to mental health challenges. The second pathway underscores that food injustice amplifies pre-existing mental health disparities within LGBTQ + communities, particularly evident in TGNC individuals who exhibit the most significant rise in depression and anxiety disorders when facing food insecurity. Findings from this study underscore the urgent need for further research and proactive responses to comprehensively address the food inequities experienced by LGBTQ + communities. It is imperative to address the underlying discrimination and stigma that perpetuate these disparities through targeted efforts, including policy initiatives, community action initiatives, and educational programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47633,"journal":{"name":"Population Research and Policy Review","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Mental Cost of Food Insecurity among LGBTQ+Americans\",\"authors\":\"Danielle Xiaodan Morales\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11113-024-09881-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study employs insights from food justice scholarship to develop a theoretical framework aimed at comprehending the intersections of food insecurity and mental health disparities within LGBTQ + populations. The framework is empirically tested and refined, drawing upon data from a nationally representative sample of 63,190 respondents from the 2022 Household Pulse Survey. This sample includes 40% cisgender men, 58% cisgender women, and 2% transgender and gender non-conforming (TGNC) individuals, with 10% identifying as non-heterosexual and 90% as heterosexual. Two distinct pathways are proposed and examined through data analysis. The first pathway reveals that LGBTQ + populations exhibit a higher prevalence of mental health challenges compared to their non-LGBTQ + counterparts. The findings also unveil nuanced mental health dynamics within LGBTQ + communities, with TGNC individuals and bisexual people demonstrating a higher susceptibility to mental health challenges. The second pathway underscores that food injustice amplifies pre-existing mental health disparities within LGBTQ + communities, particularly evident in TGNC individuals who exhibit the most significant rise in depression and anxiety disorders when facing food insecurity. Findings from this study underscore the urgent need for further research and proactive responses to comprehensively address the food inequities experienced by LGBTQ + communities. It is imperative to address the underlying discrimination and stigma that perpetuate these disparities through targeted efforts, including policy initiatives, community action initiatives, and educational programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Population Research and Policy Review\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Population Research and Policy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-024-09881-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Research and Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-024-09881-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究运用了食物正义学术研究的见解,建立了一个理论框架,旨在理解 LGBTQ + 群体中食物不安全与心理健康差异的交集。该框架利用 2022 年家庭脉搏调查(Household Pulse Survey)中具有全国代表性的 63,190 名受访者的数据进行了实证检验和完善。该样本包括 40% 的顺性别男性、58% 的顺性别女性以及 2% 的变性人和性别不符者 (TGNC),其中 10% 的人认为自己是非异性恋者,90% 的人认为自己是异性恋者。通过数据分析,提出并研究了两种不同的途径。第一条途径显示,与非 LGBTQ + 的人群相比,LGBTQ + 的人群在心理健康方面面临挑战的发生率更高。研究结果还揭示了 LGBTQ + 群体中细微的心理健康动态,其中 TGNC 人和双性恋者更容易受到心理健康挑战的影响。第二种途径强调,食物不公平扩大了 LGBTQ + 社区中原有的心理健康差异,这在 TGNC 群体中尤为明显,他们在面临食物无保障时,抑郁和焦虑症的发病率上升最为显著。这项研究的结果突出表明,迫切需要开展进一步的研究并采取积极的应对措施,以全面解决 LGBTQ + 群体所经历的食物不公平问题。当务之急是通过有针对性的努力,包括政策倡议、社区行动倡议和教育计划,解决导致这些不平等现象长期存在的潜在歧视和污名化问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Mental Cost of Food Insecurity among LGBTQ+Americans

This study employs insights from food justice scholarship to develop a theoretical framework aimed at comprehending the intersections of food insecurity and mental health disparities within LGBTQ + populations. The framework is empirically tested and refined, drawing upon data from a nationally representative sample of 63,190 respondents from the 2022 Household Pulse Survey. This sample includes 40% cisgender men, 58% cisgender women, and 2% transgender and gender non-conforming (TGNC) individuals, with 10% identifying as non-heterosexual and 90% as heterosexual. Two distinct pathways are proposed and examined through data analysis. The first pathway reveals that LGBTQ + populations exhibit a higher prevalence of mental health challenges compared to their non-LGBTQ + counterparts. The findings also unveil nuanced mental health dynamics within LGBTQ + communities, with TGNC individuals and bisexual people demonstrating a higher susceptibility to mental health challenges. The second pathway underscores that food injustice amplifies pre-existing mental health disparities within LGBTQ + communities, particularly evident in TGNC individuals who exhibit the most significant rise in depression and anxiety disorders when facing food insecurity. Findings from this study underscore the urgent need for further research and proactive responses to comprehensively address the food inequities experienced by LGBTQ + communities. It is imperative to address the underlying discrimination and stigma that perpetuate these disparities through targeted efforts, including policy initiatives, community action initiatives, and educational programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Now accepted in JSTOR! Population Research and Policy Review has a twofold goal: it provides a convenient source for government officials and scholars in which they can learn about the policy implications of recent research relevant to the causes and consequences of changing population size and composition; and it provides a broad, interdisciplinary coverage of population research. Population Research and Policy Review seeks to publish quality material of interest to professionals working in the fields of population, and those fields which intersect and overlap with population studies. The publication includes demographic, economic, social, political and health research papers and related contributions which are based on either the direct scientific evaluation of particular policies or programs, or general contributions intended to advance knowledge that informs policy and program development.
期刊最新文献
Realization of Short-Term Fertility Intentions in a Comparative Perspective: Which Macro-Level Conditions Matter? Perceived Spousal Concordance on Desired Family Size and Birth Intendedness Among Second and Higher-Order Births in Pakistan Health Care Access Among Children in Latinx Families Across U.S. Destinations State-Level LGBTQ + Policies and Experiences of Interpersonal Discrimination among Sexual and Gender Minority People Infant Mortality in Mother and Baby Homes in 20th Century Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1