识别印度银行业在 COVID-19 危机期间的财务业绩驱动因素

IF 0.7 Q3 ECONOMICS JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE ECONOMICS Pub Date : 2024-04-20 DOI:10.1007/s40953-024-00396-9
Anju Goswami, Pooja Malik
{"title":"识别印度银行业在 COVID-19 危机期间的财务业绩驱动因素","authors":"Anju Goswami, Pooja Malik","doi":"10.1007/s40953-024-00396-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In order to shed light on the possible factors responsible for volatility in the financial performance of Indian banks, we primarily consider four novel variables in the study, including the COVID-19 crisis, NPLs, systemic risk, and government response. For this, we employ bank-level observations of 412 Indian commercial banks spanning 2018–2022. Using fixed-effects and 2SLS methods, we find that government response, COVID-19, and income diversification play a significant role in positively affecting the financial performance of Indian banks. However, non-performing loans, provisioning, systemic risk, and bank size are responsible for their poor performance. Projected macro-economic statistics suggest that the GDP growth rate and inflation have significantly increased the strength and resilience of Indian banks. The main evidence mainly supports the ‘<i>bad-management</i>’<i>, </i>‘<i>too-big-too-fail</i>’<i>, and </i>‘<i>diversification opportunity</i>’ hypotheses. The heterogeneity test and robustness check results are nearly identical to those reported in the main evidence. Overall, our findings reduce the concern of policymakers, though not completely eliminated, that tighter government regulation and provisioning for Indian banks may expedite the bank’s ability to withstand their credit risk, systemic risk, and exogenous shocks, which can lead to a rapid improvement in their performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":42219,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE ECONOMICS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Financial Performance Drivers in the Indian Banking Sector During the COVID-19 Crisis\",\"authors\":\"Anju Goswami, Pooja Malik\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40953-024-00396-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In order to shed light on the possible factors responsible for volatility in the financial performance of Indian banks, we primarily consider four novel variables in the study, including the COVID-19 crisis, NPLs, systemic risk, and government response. For this, we employ bank-level observations of 412 Indian commercial banks spanning 2018–2022. Using fixed-effects and 2SLS methods, we find that government response, COVID-19, and income diversification play a significant role in positively affecting the financial performance of Indian banks. However, non-performing loans, provisioning, systemic risk, and bank size are responsible for their poor performance. Projected macro-economic statistics suggest that the GDP growth rate and inflation have significantly increased the strength and resilience of Indian banks. The main evidence mainly supports the ‘<i>bad-management</i>’<i>, </i>‘<i>too-big-too-fail</i>’<i>, and </i>‘<i>diversification opportunity</i>’ hypotheses. The heterogeneity test and robustness check results are nearly identical to those reported in the main evidence. Overall, our findings reduce the concern of policymakers, though not completely eliminated, that tighter government regulation and provisioning for Indian banks may expedite the bank’s ability to withstand their credit risk, systemic risk, and exogenous shocks, which can lead to a rapid improvement in their performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE ECONOMICS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE ECONOMICS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-024-00396-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE ECONOMICS","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-024-00396-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了揭示导致印度银行财务业绩波动的可能因素,我们在研究中主要考虑了四个新变量,包括 COVID-19 危机、不良贷款率、系统性风险和政府反应。为此,我们采用了 412 家印度商业银行的银行级观测数据,时间跨度为 2018-2022 年。利用固定效应和 2SLS 方法,我们发现政府响应、COVID-19 和收入多样化对印度银行的财务绩效有显著的正向影响作用。然而,不良贷款、拨备、系统性风险和银行规模则是导致其表现不佳的原因。预测的宏观经济统计数据表明,GDP 增长率和通货膨胀率大大增强了印度银行的实力和抗风险能力。主要证据主要支持 "管理不善"、"规模太大而失败 "和 "多样化机会 "假说。异质性检验和稳健性检验结果与主要证据报告的结果几乎相同。总体而言,我们的研究结果虽然没有完全消除决策者的担忧,但减少了他们的顾虑,即政府对印度银行加强监管和拨备可能会加快银行抵御信用风险、系统性风险和外生冲击的能力,从而导致银行业绩的快速改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identifying Financial Performance Drivers in the Indian Banking Sector During the COVID-19 Crisis

In order to shed light on the possible factors responsible for volatility in the financial performance of Indian banks, we primarily consider four novel variables in the study, including the COVID-19 crisis, NPLs, systemic risk, and government response. For this, we employ bank-level observations of 412 Indian commercial banks spanning 2018–2022. Using fixed-effects and 2SLS methods, we find that government response, COVID-19, and income diversification play a significant role in positively affecting the financial performance of Indian banks. However, non-performing loans, provisioning, systemic risk, and bank size are responsible for their poor performance. Projected macro-economic statistics suggest that the GDP growth rate and inflation have significantly increased the strength and resilience of Indian banks. The main evidence mainly supports the ‘bad-management, too-big-too-fail, and diversification opportunity’ hypotheses. The heterogeneity test and robustness check results are nearly identical to those reported in the main evidence. Overall, our findings reduce the concern of policymakers, though not completely eliminated, that tighter government regulation and provisioning for Indian banks may expedite the bank’s ability to withstand their credit risk, systemic risk, and exogenous shocks, which can lead to a rapid improvement in their performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Quantitative Economics (JQEC) is a refereed journal of the Indian Econometric Society (TIES). It solicits quantitative papers with basic or applied research orientation in all sub-fields of Economics that employ rigorous theoretical, empirical and experimental methods. The Journal also encourages Short Papers and Review Articles. Innovative and fundamental papers that focus on various facets of Economics of the Emerging Market and Developing Economies are particularly welcome. With the help of an international Editorial board and carefully selected referees, it aims to minimize the time taken to complete the review process while preserving the quality of the articles published.
期刊最新文献
Manufacturing Activity and Inequality in India Understanding Labor Market Dynamics in Urban India Amidst the Pandemic: A Study Employing Supervised Learning Methods Problem of the Plenty- Ethnic Fractionalization and Female Employment in Rural India Trade Liberalization and Labour Market Dynamics: Evidence from India Agro-Climatic Environment Heterogeneity and Productivity Convergence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1