以周围神经阻滞为主要麻醉方式时,麻醉开始时间记录的准确性

Alexander B Stone, Andrés Zorrilla Vaca, Philipp Lirk, Philipp Gerner, Kamen Vlassakov
{"title":"以周围神经阻滞为主要麻醉方式时,麻醉开始时间记录的准确性","authors":"Alexander B Stone, Andrés Zorrilla Vaca, Philipp Lirk, Philipp Gerner, Kamen Vlassakov","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction When used as the primary anesthetic, nerve blocks are not billed as separate procedures. In this scenario, the anesthesia start (A Start ) time should include the block procedural time. We measured how often A Start time was documented before the nerve block was placed in the preoperative area, and compared cases where a block team performed the nerve block and cases where the intraoperative anesthesia attending supervised the nerve block. We hypothesized that the involvement of a regional anesthesia team would lead to more accurate documentation of A Start . We also estimated the lost revenue due to inaccurate start time documentation. Methods The study population were patients undergoing surgery with a peripheral nerve block as the primary anesthetic. For this analysis, A Start occurring less than 10 min before the in-operating room time was defined as potentially inaccurate. Lost potential revenue was estimated by taking the difference between the documented time of local anesthetic administration and the documented A Start time. Results A total of 745 cases were analyzed. Overall, 439 cases (58%) cases were identified as having potentially inaccurate start times. There were higher rates of inaccurate A Start documentation by the block team (316/482, 65.5%) compared with blocks supervised by the in-room anesthesia attendings (123/263, 46.7%, p<0.001). Overall, the estimated loss in billable revenue during the study period was a total of $70 265. Conclusions The performance of primary regional anesthesia procedure by a block team increased the incidence of inaccurate documentation and uncaptured potential revenue. There is need for education about accurate nerve block documentation for anesthesiologists, especially when separate teams are used. No data are available.","PeriodicalId":21046,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anesthesia start time documentation accuracy where peripheral nerve block is the primary anesthetic\",\"authors\":\"Alexander B Stone, Andrés Zorrilla Vaca, Philipp Lirk, Philipp Gerner, Kamen Vlassakov\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2024-105292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction When used as the primary anesthetic, nerve blocks are not billed as separate procedures. In this scenario, the anesthesia start (A Start ) time should include the block procedural time. We measured how often A Start time was documented before the nerve block was placed in the preoperative area, and compared cases where a block team performed the nerve block and cases where the intraoperative anesthesia attending supervised the nerve block. We hypothesized that the involvement of a regional anesthesia team would lead to more accurate documentation of A Start . We also estimated the lost revenue due to inaccurate start time documentation. Methods The study population were patients undergoing surgery with a peripheral nerve block as the primary anesthetic. For this analysis, A Start occurring less than 10 min before the in-operating room time was defined as potentially inaccurate. Lost potential revenue was estimated by taking the difference between the documented time of local anesthetic administration and the documented A Start time. Results A total of 745 cases were analyzed. Overall, 439 cases (58%) cases were identified as having potentially inaccurate start times. There were higher rates of inaccurate A Start documentation by the block team (316/482, 65.5%) compared with blocks supervised by the in-room anesthesia attendings (123/263, 46.7%, p<0.001). Overall, the estimated loss in billable revenue during the study period was a total of $70 265. Conclusions The performance of primary regional anesthesia procedure by a block team increased the incidence of inaccurate documentation and uncaptured potential revenue. There is need for education about accurate nerve block documentation for anesthesiologists, especially when separate teams are used. No data are available.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105292\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:神经阻滞作为主要麻醉手段使用时,不作为单独程序计费。在这种情况下,麻醉开始(A Start)时间应包括阻滞程序时间。我们测量了在术前区域进行神经阻滞前记录 "A 开始 "时间的频率,并比较了由阻滞小组实施神经阻滞的病例和由术中麻醉主治医师监督神经阻滞的病例。我们假设,区域麻醉团队的参与将使 "开始时间 "的记录更加准确。我们还估算了因起始时间记录不准确而造成的收入损失。方法 研究对象是以周围神经阻滞作为主要麻醉方式的手术患者。在本次分析中,在手术室时间之前 10 分钟内发生的 "开始 "时间被定义为可能不准确。潜在收入损失根据记录的局麻药给药时间与记录的 A 开始时间之间的差值进行估算。结果 共分析了 745 个病例。总体而言,有 439 个病例(58%)的开始时间可能不准确。与室内麻醉主治医师监督的阻滞相比,阻滞小组记录的 A 开始时间不准确的比例更高(316/482,65.5%)(123/263,46.7%,p<0.001)。总体而言,在研究期间,估计共损失了 70 265 美元的计费收入。结论 由阻滞小组实施初级区域麻醉手术增加了不准确记录的发生率和未捕获的潜在收入。有必要对麻醉医生进行有关神经阻滞准确记录的教育,尤其是在使用独立团队的情况下。暂无数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anesthesia start time documentation accuracy where peripheral nerve block is the primary anesthetic
Introduction When used as the primary anesthetic, nerve blocks are not billed as separate procedures. In this scenario, the anesthesia start (A Start ) time should include the block procedural time. We measured how often A Start time was documented before the nerve block was placed in the preoperative area, and compared cases where a block team performed the nerve block and cases where the intraoperative anesthesia attending supervised the nerve block. We hypothesized that the involvement of a regional anesthesia team would lead to more accurate documentation of A Start . We also estimated the lost revenue due to inaccurate start time documentation. Methods The study population were patients undergoing surgery with a peripheral nerve block as the primary anesthetic. For this analysis, A Start occurring less than 10 min before the in-operating room time was defined as potentially inaccurate. Lost potential revenue was estimated by taking the difference between the documented time of local anesthetic administration and the documented A Start time. Results A total of 745 cases were analyzed. Overall, 439 cases (58%) cases were identified as having potentially inaccurate start times. There were higher rates of inaccurate A Start documentation by the block team (316/482, 65.5%) compared with blocks supervised by the in-room anesthesia attendings (123/263, 46.7%, p<0.001). Overall, the estimated loss in billable revenue during the study period was a total of $70 265. Conclusions The performance of primary regional anesthesia procedure by a block team increased the incidence of inaccurate documentation and uncaptured potential revenue. There is need for education about accurate nerve block documentation for anesthesiologists, especially when separate teams are used. No data are available.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal techniques of ultrasound-guided superficial and deep parasternal intercostal plane blocks—a cadaveric study Multimodal analgesia and the erector spinae plane block in a rapid recovery pathway after posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a randomized controlled study of practicality In reply: evaluating the efficacy of PENG and SIFICB in hip fracture analgesia – a critical analysis Invited reply letter: optimal techniques of ultrasound-guided superficial and deep parasternal intercostal plane blocks – a cadaveric study Postoperative epidural analgesia and outcomes following pediatric bilateral lung and heart-lung transplantation: a retrospective observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1