对绩效考核做法的公正认知会通过情感承诺影响组织公民行为吗?来自信息技术行业的证据

Ram Shankar Uraon, Ravikumar Kumarasamy
{"title":"对绩效考核做法的公正认知会通过情感承诺影响组织公民行为吗?来自信息技术行业的证据","authors":"Ram Shankar Uraon, Ravikumar Kumarasamy","doi":"10.1108/sajbs-10-2022-0363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The paper aims to examine the effect of justice perceptions of performance appraisal (JPPA) practices (i.e. distributive, procedural, informational and interpersonal justice) on organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and affective commitment (AC) and the effect of AC on OCB. Further, it investigates the mediating role of AC in the relationship between JPPA practices and OCB. Moreover, this study examines the moderating effect of job level on the relationship between JPPA practices and OCB.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The data were collected using a self-reported structured questionnaire. A total of 650 questionnaires were distributed among the employees of 50 information technology (IT) companies in India, and 503 samples were obtained. The conceptual framework was tested using the partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) method, and the moderating effect was tested using process macro.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings of this study reveal that the JPPA practices positively affect OCB and AC and AC affects OCB. Further, AC partially mediates this relationship between JPPA practices and OCB. Furthermore, the direct effect of JPPA practices on OCB happens to be strengthened when the job level decreases, thus confirming the moderating role of job level.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The findings of this study augment the social exchange theory (SET) by suggesting that individuals perceiving justice or fairness in performance appraisal practices are likely to have a greater AC that ultimately engages employees in OCB.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>This study will be helpful for human resource practitioners in IT companies who are responsible for the fairness of performance appraisal practices and expect their employees to be emotionally attached to the organization and engaged in OCB.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The study adds to the body of knowledge of how justice in performance appraisal practices links to OCB through AC and moderates by job level in an emerging economy in Asia.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":55618,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Journal of Business Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do justice perceptions of performance appraisal practices affect organizational citizenship behavior through affective commitment? Evidence from the information technology industry\",\"authors\":\"Ram Shankar Uraon, Ravikumar Kumarasamy\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/sajbs-10-2022-0363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>The paper aims to examine the effect of justice perceptions of performance appraisal (JPPA) practices (i.e. distributive, procedural, informational and interpersonal justice) on organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and affective commitment (AC) and the effect of AC on OCB. Further, it investigates the mediating role of AC in the relationship between JPPA practices and OCB. Moreover, this study examines the moderating effect of job level on the relationship between JPPA practices and OCB.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The data were collected using a self-reported structured questionnaire. A total of 650 questionnaires were distributed among the employees of 50 information technology (IT) companies in India, and 503 samples were obtained. The conceptual framework was tested using the partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) method, and the moderating effect was tested using process macro.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The findings of this study reveal that the JPPA practices positively affect OCB and AC and AC affects OCB. Further, AC partially mediates this relationship between JPPA practices and OCB. Furthermore, the direct effect of JPPA practices on OCB happens to be strengthened when the job level decreases, thus confirming the moderating role of job level.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>The findings of this study augment the social exchange theory (SET) by suggesting that individuals perceiving justice or fairness in performance appraisal practices are likely to have a greater AC that ultimately engages employees in OCB.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>This study will be helpful for human resource practitioners in IT companies who are responsible for the fairness of performance appraisal practices and expect their employees to be emotionally attached to the organization and engaged in OCB.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The study adds to the body of knowledge of how justice in performance appraisal practices links to OCB through AC and moderates by job level in an emerging economy in Asia.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":55618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South Asian Journal of Business Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South Asian Journal of Business Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/sajbs-10-2022-0363\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Journal of Business Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sajbs-10-2022-0363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本文旨在研究绩效考核(JPA)实践的公正感(即分配公正、程序公正、信息公正和人际公正)对组织公民行为(OCB)和情感承诺(AC)的影响,以及AC对OCB的影响。此外,本研究还探讨了 AC 在 JPPA 实践与 OCB 关系中的中介作用。此外,本研究还探讨了工作级别对 JPPA 实践与 OCB 关系的调节作用。共向印度 50 家信息技术(IT)公司的员工发放了 650 份问卷,获得 503 个样本。使用偏最小二乘结构方程建模法(PLS-SEM)检验了概念框架,并使用过程宏观法检验了调节效应。研究结果研究结果表明,JPPA 实践积极影响 OCB 和 AC,AC 影响 OCB。此外,AC 在 JPPA 实践与 OCB 之间起到了部分中介作用。此外,当工作级别降低时,JPPA 实践对 OCB 的直接影响会加强,从而证实了工作级别的调节作用。研究局限/启示本研究的结果表明,在绩效考核实践中感知到公正或公平的个体很可能会有更多的 AC,从而最终使员工参与到 OCB 中来,从而加强了社会交换理论(SET)。实践意义本研究将对 IT 公司的人力资源从业人员有所帮助,因为他们负责绩效考核实践的公平性,并期望员工对组织产生情感依恋并参与到 OCB 中来。原创性/价值本研究为亚洲新兴经济体的绩效考核实践中的公正性如何通过 AC 与 OCB 联系起来,并通过工作级别进行调节,提供了更多的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do justice perceptions of performance appraisal practices affect organizational citizenship behavior through affective commitment? Evidence from the information technology industry

Purpose

The paper aims to examine the effect of justice perceptions of performance appraisal (JPPA) practices (i.e. distributive, procedural, informational and interpersonal justice) on organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and affective commitment (AC) and the effect of AC on OCB. Further, it investigates the mediating role of AC in the relationship between JPPA practices and OCB. Moreover, this study examines the moderating effect of job level on the relationship between JPPA practices and OCB.

Design/methodology/approach

The data were collected using a self-reported structured questionnaire. A total of 650 questionnaires were distributed among the employees of 50 information technology (IT) companies in India, and 503 samples were obtained. The conceptual framework was tested using the partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) method, and the moderating effect was tested using process macro.

Findings

The findings of this study reveal that the JPPA practices positively affect OCB and AC and AC affects OCB. Further, AC partially mediates this relationship between JPPA practices and OCB. Furthermore, the direct effect of JPPA practices on OCB happens to be strengthened when the job level decreases, thus confirming the moderating role of job level.

Research limitations/implications

The findings of this study augment the social exchange theory (SET) by suggesting that individuals perceiving justice or fairness in performance appraisal practices are likely to have a greater AC that ultimately engages employees in OCB.

Practical implications

This study will be helpful for human resource practitioners in IT companies who are responsible for the fairness of performance appraisal practices and expect their employees to be emotionally attached to the organization and engaged in OCB.

Originality/value

The study adds to the body of knowledge of how justice in performance appraisal practices links to OCB through AC and moderates by job level in an emerging economy in Asia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Fostering sustainable employability: the nexus of social support and career competencies in healthcare Financial awareness, investment strategies and investor satisfaction: a multilayered empirical model testing in the Indian context Analytical modeling of perceived authenticity in AI assistants: application of PLS-predict algorithm and importance-performance map analysis Manifestations of loan growth – profitability and non-performing loans – a study of the Indian banking sector Unlocking subsidiary performance: exploring the impact of subsidiary TMT composition, PCN tenure and subsidiary age
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1