精神病和氯氮平负荷在耐药精神分裂症患者过度自查中的作用:纵向观察研究

Emilio Fernandez-Egea, Shanquan Chen, Estela Sangüesa, Patricia Gassó, Marjan Biria, James Plaistow, Isaac Jarratt-Barnham, Nuria Segarra, Sergi Mas, Maria-Pilar Ribate, Cristina B. García, Naomi A. Fineberg, Yulia Worbe, Rudolf N. Cardinal, Trevor W. Robbins
{"title":"精神病和氯氮平负荷在耐药精神分裂症患者过度自查中的作用:纵向观察研究","authors":"Emilio Fernandez-Egea, Shanquan Chen, Estela Sangüesa, Patricia Gassó, Marjan Biria, James Plaistow, Isaac Jarratt-Barnham, Nuria Segarra, Sergi Mas, Maria-Pilar Ribate, Cristina B. García, Naomi A. Fineberg, Yulia Worbe, Rudolf N. Cardinal, Trevor W. Robbins","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2024.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Background</span><p>A significant proportion of people with clozapine-treated schizophrenia develop ‘checking’ compulsions, a phenomenon yet to be understood.</p><span>Aims</span><p>To use habit formation models developed in cognitive neuroscience to investigate the dynamic interplay between psychosis, clozapine dose and obsessive–compulsive symptoms (OCS).</p><span>Method</span><p>Using the anonymised electronic records of a cohort of clozapine-treated patients, including longitudinal assessments of OCS and psychosis, we performed longitudinal multi-level mediation and multi-level moderation analyses to explore associations of psychosis with obsessiveness and excessive checking. Classic bivariate correlation tests were used to assess clozapine load and checking compulsions. The influence of specific genetic variants was tested in a subsample.</p><span>Results</span><p>A total of 196 clozapine-treated individuals and 459 face-to-face assessments were included. We found significant OCS to be common (37.9%), with checking being the most prevalent symptom. In mediation models, psychosis severity mediated checking behaviour indirectly by inducing obsessions (<span>r</span> = 0.07, 95% CI 0.04–0.09; <span>P</span> &lt; 0.001). No direct effect of psychosis on checking was identified (<span>r</span> = −0.28, 95% CI −0.09 to 0.03; <span>P</span> = 0.340). After psychosis remission (<span>n</span> = 65), checking compulsions correlated with both clozapine plasma levels (<span>r</span> = 0.35; <span>P</span> = 0.004) and dose (<span>r</span> = 0.38; <span>P</span> = 0.002). None of the glutamatergic and serotonergic genetic variants were found to moderate the effect of psychosis on obsession and compulsion (SLC6A4, SLC1A1 and HTR2C) survived the multiple comparisons correction.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>We elucidated different phases of the complex interplay of psychosis and compulsions, which may inform clinicians’ therapeutic decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":22495,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of psychosis and clozapine load in excessive checking in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: longitudinal observational study\",\"authors\":\"Emilio Fernandez-Egea, Shanquan Chen, Estela Sangüesa, Patricia Gassó, Marjan Biria, James Plaistow, Isaac Jarratt-Barnham, Nuria Segarra, Sergi Mas, Maria-Pilar Ribate, Cristina B. García, Naomi A. Fineberg, Yulia Worbe, Rudolf N. Cardinal, Trevor W. Robbins\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/bjp.2024.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span>Background</span><p>A significant proportion of people with clozapine-treated schizophrenia develop ‘checking’ compulsions, a phenomenon yet to be understood.</p><span>Aims</span><p>To use habit formation models developed in cognitive neuroscience to investigate the dynamic interplay between psychosis, clozapine dose and obsessive–compulsive symptoms (OCS).</p><span>Method</span><p>Using the anonymised electronic records of a cohort of clozapine-treated patients, including longitudinal assessments of OCS and psychosis, we performed longitudinal multi-level mediation and multi-level moderation analyses to explore associations of psychosis with obsessiveness and excessive checking. Classic bivariate correlation tests were used to assess clozapine load and checking compulsions. The influence of specific genetic variants was tested in a subsample.</p><span>Results</span><p>A total of 196 clozapine-treated individuals and 459 face-to-face assessments were included. We found significant OCS to be common (37.9%), with checking being the most prevalent symptom. In mediation models, psychosis severity mediated checking behaviour indirectly by inducing obsessions (<span>r</span> = 0.07, 95% CI 0.04–0.09; <span>P</span> &lt; 0.001). No direct effect of psychosis on checking was identified (<span>r</span> = −0.28, 95% CI −0.09 to 0.03; <span>P</span> = 0.340). After psychosis remission (<span>n</span> = 65), checking compulsions correlated with both clozapine plasma levels (<span>r</span> = 0.35; <span>P</span> = 0.004) and dose (<span>r</span> = 0.38; <span>P</span> = 0.002). None of the glutamatergic and serotonergic genetic variants were found to moderate the effect of psychosis on obsession and compulsion (SLC6A4, SLC1A1 and HTR2C) survived the multiple comparisons correction.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>We elucidated different phases of the complex interplay of psychosis and compulsions, which may inform clinicians’ therapeutic decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2024.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2024.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景相当一部分接受过氯氮平治疗的精神分裂症患者会出现 "检查 "强迫症,这种现象尚待了解。目的利用认知神经科学中开发的习惯形成模型来研究精神病、氯氮平剂量和强迫症状(OCS)之间的动态相互作用。方法利用一组接受氯氮平治疗的患者的匿名电子记录(包括对强迫症状和精神病的纵向评估),我们进行了纵向多层次中介分析和多层次调节分析,以探讨精神病与强迫症和过度检查之间的关联。经典的双变量相关测试用于评估氯氮平负荷和检查强迫症。结果 共纳入了 196 名接受过氯氮平治疗的患者和 459 次面对面评估。我们发现明显的强迫症很常见(37.9%),其中检查是最普遍的症状。在中介模型中,精神病的严重程度通过诱发强迫症间接中介了检查行为(r = 0.07, 95% CI 0.04-0.09; P < 0.001)。没有发现精神病对检查行为有直接影响(r = -0.28, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.03; P = 0.340)。精神病缓解后(n = 65),强迫检查与氯氮平血浆水平(r = 0.35;P = 0.004)和剂量(r = 0.38;P = 0.002)相关。谷氨酸能基因变异和血清素能基因变异(SLC6A4、SLC1A1和HTR2C)在多重比较校正后均未发现对精神病对强迫和痴迷的影响有调节作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of psychosis and clozapine load in excessive checking in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: longitudinal observational study
Background

A significant proportion of people with clozapine-treated schizophrenia develop ‘checking’ compulsions, a phenomenon yet to be understood.

Aims

To use habit formation models developed in cognitive neuroscience to investigate the dynamic interplay between psychosis, clozapine dose and obsessive–compulsive symptoms (OCS).

Method

Using the anonymised electronic records of a cohort of clozapine-treated patients, including longitudinal assessments of OCS and psychosis, we performed longitudinal multi-level mediation and multi-level moderation analyses to explore associations of psychosis with obsessiveness and excessive checking. Classic bivariate correlation tests were used to assess clozapine load and checking compulsions. The influence of specific genetic variants was tested in a subsample.

Results

A total of 196 clozapine-treated individuals and 459 face-to-face assessments were included. We found significant OCS to be common (37.9%), with checking being the most prevalent symptom. In mediation models, psychosis severity mediated checking behaviour indirectly by inducing obsessions (r = 0.07, 95% CI 0.04–0.09; P < 0.001). No direct effect of psychosis on checking was identified (r = −0.28, 95% CI −0.09 to 0.03; P = 0.340). After psychosis remission (n = 65), checking compulsions correlated with both clozapine plasma levels (r = 0.35; P = 0.004) and dose (r = 0.38; P = 0.002). None of the glutamatergic and serotonergic genetic variants were found to moderate the effect of psychosis on obsession and compulsion (SLC6A4, SLC1A1 and HTR2C) survived the multiple comparisons correction.

Conclusions

We elucidated different phases of the complex interplay of psychosis and compulsions, which may inform clinicians’ therapeutic decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Racial disparities influence access and outcomes in talking therapies Taming the Chimaera–Hydra: disconnecting from the net to fortify our mental health Artificial intelligence and cybercrime: implications for individuals and the healthcare sector Chronopsychiatry Racism in psychiatry and the case of presentism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1