支架回缩器回缩导致血管移位的相关因素:体外研究

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1016/j.neurad.2024.04.002
Hiroyuki Ikeda, Masanori Kinosada, Minami Uezato, Yoshitaka Kurosaki, Masaki Chin, Sen Yamagata
{"title":"支架回缩器回缩导致血管移位的相关因素:体外研究","authors":"Hiroyuki Ikeda,&nbsp;Masanori Kinosada,&nbsp;Minami Uezato,&nbsp;Yoshitaka Kurosaki,&nbsp;Masaki Chin,&nbsp;Sen Yamagata","doi":"10.1016/j.neurad.2024.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Thrombectomy with a stent retriever (SR) may lead to intracranial hemorrhage due to vessel displacement. We aimed to explore factors related to vessel displacement using an in vitro vessel model.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A vessel model mimicking two-dimensional left internal carotid angiography findings was used in this study. Six SR types (Solitaire 3 × 40, 4 × 40, and 6 × 40; Embotrap 5 × 37; Trevo 4 × 41; and Tron 4 × 40) were fully deployed in the M2 ascending, M2 bend, or M1 horizontal portion. Subsequently, the SR was retracted, and the vessel displacement, maximum SR retraction force, and angle of the M2 bend portion were measured. A total of 180 SR retraction experiments were conducted using 6 SR types at 3 deployment positions with 10 repetitions each.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean maximum distance of vessel displacement for Embotrap Ⅲ 5 × 37 (6.4 ± 3.5 mm, <em>n</em> = 30) was significantly longer than that for the other five SR types (<em>p</em> = 0.029 for Solitaire 6 × 40 and <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001 for the others, respectively). Vessel displacement was significantly longer in the M2 ascending portion group (5.4 ± 3.0 mm, <em>n</em> = 60) than in the M2 bend portion group (3.3 ± 1.6 mm, <em>n</em> = 60) (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and it was significantly longer in the M2 bend portion group than in the M1 horizontal portion group (1.1 ± 0.7 mm, <em>n</em> = 60) (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). A positive correlation existed between the mean maximum SR retraction force or mean angle of the M2 bend portion due to SR retraction (i.e., vessel straightening) and the mean maximum distance of vessel displacement (<em>r</em> = 0.90, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; <em>r</em> = 0.90, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Vessel displacement varied with the SR type, size, and deployment position. Moreover, vessel displacement correlated with the SR retraction force or vessel straightening of the M2 bend portion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors related to vessel displacement due to stent retriever retraction: An in vitro study\",\"authors\":\"Hiroyuki Ikeda,&nbsp;Masanori Kinosada,&nbsp;Minami Uezato,&nbsp;Yoshitaka Kurosaki,&nbsp;Masaki Chin,&nbsp;Sen Yamagata\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neurad.2024.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Thrombectomy with a stent retriever (SR) may lead to intracranial hemorrhage due to vessel displacement. We aimed to explore factors related to vessel displacement using an in vitro vessel model.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A vessel model mimicking two-dimensional left internal carotid angiography findings was used in this study. Six SR types (Solitaire 3 × 40, 4 × 40, and 6 × 40; Embotrap 5 × 37; Trevo 4 × 41; and Tron 4 × 40) were fully deployed in the M2 ascending, M2 bend, or M1 horizontal portion. Subsequently, the SR was retracted, and the vessel displacement, maximum SR retraction force, and angle of the M2 bend portion were measured. A total of 180 SR retraction experiments were conducted using 6 SR types at 3 deployment positions with 10 repetitions each.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean maximum distance of vessel displacement for Embotrap Ⅲ 5 × 37 (6.4 ± 3.5 mm, <em>n</em> = 30) was significantly longer than that for the other five SR types (<em>p</em> = 0.029 for Solitaire 6 × 40 and <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001 for the others, respectively). Vessel displacement was significantly longer in the M2 ascending portion group (5.4 ± 3.0 mm, <em>n</em> = 60) than in the M2 bend portion group (3.3 ± 1.6 mm, <em>n</em> = 60) (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and it was significantly longer in the M2 bend portion group than in the M1 horizontal portion group (1.1 ± 0.7 mm, <em>n</em> = 60) (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). A positive correlation existed between the mean maximum SR retraction force or mean angle of the M2 bend portion due to SR retraction (i.e., vessel straightening) and the mean maximum distance of vessel displacement (<em>r</em> = 0.90, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; <em>r</em> = 0.90, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Vessel displacement varied with the SR type, size, and deployment position. Moreover, vessel displacement correlated with the SR retraction force or vessel straightening of the M2 bend portion.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0150986124001147\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0150986124001147","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用支架回流器(SR)进行血栓清除术可能会因血管移位而导致颅内出血。我们旨在利用体外血管模型探讨与血管移位有关的因素。本研究使用了一个模仿二维左侧颈内动脉造影结果的血管模型。六种类型的 SR(Solitaire 3 × 40、4 × 40 和 6 × 40;Embotrap 5 × 37;Trevo 4 × 41 和 Tron 4 × 40)在 M2 升支、M2 弯支或 M1 水平部分完全展开。随后,SR 回缩,并测量血管位移、最大 SR 回缩力和 M2 弯曲部分的角度。在 3 个部署位置使用 6 种 SR 进行了共计 180 次 SR 回缩实验,每次重复 10 次。Embotrap Ⅲ 5 × 37 的血管位移平均最大距离(6.4 ± 3.5 mm,= 30)明显长于其他五种 SR 类型(Solitaire 6 × 40 = 0.029,其他类型小于 0.001)。M2 上升部分组的血管移位(5.4 ± 3.0 mm,= 60)明显长于 M2 弯曲部分组(3.3 ± 1.6 mm,= 60)(< 0.001),M2 弯曲部分组的血管移位明显长于 M1 水平部分组(1.1 ± 0.7 mm,= 60)(< 0.001)。平均最大 SR 回缩力或因 SR 回缩(即血管拉直)造成的 M2 弯曲部分的平均角度与平均最大血管移位距离之间存在正相关(分别为 = 0.90,< 0.001;= 0.90,< 0.001)。血管位移随 SR 类型、大小和部署位置而变化。此外,血管位移与 SR 回缩力或 M2 弯曲部分的血管伸直度相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors related to vessel displacement due to stent retriever retraction: An in vitro study

Background

Thrombectomy with a stent retriever (SR) may lead to intracranial hemorrhage due to vessel displacement. We aimed to explore factors related to vessel displacement using an in vitro vessel model.

Methods

A vessel model mimicking two-dimensional left internal carotid angiography findings was used in this study. Six SR types (Solitaire 3 × 40, 4 × 40, and 6 × 40; Embotrap 5 × 37; Trevo 4 × 41; and Tron 4 × 40) were fully deployed in the M2 ascending, M2 bend, or M1 horizontal portion. Subsequently, the SR was retracted, and the vessel displacement, maximum SR retraction force, and angle of the M2 bend portion were measured. A total of 180 SR retraction experiments were conducted using 6 SR types at 3 deployment positions with 10 repetitions each.

Results

The mean maximum distance of vessel displacement for Embotrap Ⅲ 5 × 37 (6.4 ± 3.5 mm, n = 30) was significantly longer than that for the other five SR types (p = 0.029 for Solitaire 6 × 40 and p < 0.001 for the others, respectively). Vessel displacement was significantly longer in the M2 ascending portion group (5.4 ± 3.0 mm, n = 60) than in the M2 bend portion group (3.3 ± 1.6 mm, n = 60) (p < 0.001) and it was significantly longer in the M2 bend portion group than in the M1 horizontal portion group (1.1 ± 0.7 mm, n = 60) (p < 0.001). A positive correlation existed between the mean maximum SR retraction force or mean angle of the M2 bend portion due to SR retraction (i.e., vessel straightening) and the mean maximum distance of vessel displacement (r = 0.90, p < 0.001; r = 0.90, p < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

Vessel displacement varied with the SR type, size, and deployment position. Moreover, vessel displacement correlated with the SR retraction force or vessel straightening of the M2 bend portion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroradiology
Journal of Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.70%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroradiology is a peer-reviewed journal, publishing worldwide clinical and basic research in the field of diagnostic and Interventional neuroradiology, translational and molecular neuroimaging, and artificial intelligence in neuroradiology. The Journal of Neuroradiology considers for publication articles, reviews, technical notes and letters to the editors (correspondence section), provided that the methodology and scientific content are of high quality, and that the results will have substantial clinical impact and/or physiological importance.
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Contents Progressive T1 high-intensity plaques in carotid stenosis: Comparative MRI analyses in asymptomatic and symptomatic phases of low-grade stenosis Using the sandwich technique for the treatment of sigmoid sinus diverticulum causing pulsatile tinnitus Assessment of large-scale imaging practices in patients with acute brain hemorrhage in French emergency departments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1