评估可调电阻脉冲传感 (TRPS) 技术在疫苗制剂中的粒度分布--与动态光散射法的比较研究

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pharmaceutical Research Pub Date : 2024-04-22 DOI:10.1007/s11095-024-03698-y
Rahul Misra, Ginny Fung, Siddhant Sharma, Jian Hu, Marina Kirkitadze
{"title":"评估可调电阻脉冲传感 (TRPS) 技术在疫苗制剂中的粒度分布--与动态光散射法的比较研究","authors":"Rahul Misra, Ginny Fung, Siddhant Sharma, Jian Hu, Marina Kirkitadze","doi":"10.1007/s11095-024-03698-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>A comparative assessment was performed to evaluate the potential of particle sizing by an ensemble based conventional dynamic light scattering (DLS) technique and an emerging technology based on tunable resistive pulse sensing (TRPS) using particle by particle approach by evaluating three different types of vaccine formulations representing three case studies and showing the limitation of each technique, instrument variability, sensitivity, and the resolution in mixed population.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Three types of in-house vaccine formulations- a protein antigen, an outer membrane vesicle and viral particles were simultaneously evaluated by TRPS based Exoid and two DLS instruments-Zetatrac and Zetasizer for particle size distribution, aggregates, and resolution of polydisperse species.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The data from first case study show the risk of possible size overestimation and size averaging in polydisperse samples in DLS measurements which can be addressed by the TRPS analysis. It also shows how TRPS may be utilized only to large size antigens due to its limited size range. The second case study highlights the difference in the sensitivities of two DLS instruments working on the same principle. The third case study show that how TRPS can better resolve the large aggregate species compare to DLS in polydisperse samples.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>This analysis shows that TRPS can be used as an orthogonal technique in addition to conventional DLS based methods for more precise and in-depth characterization. Both techniques are efficient in size characterization and produce comparable results, however the choice will depend on the type of formulation and size range to be evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":20027,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Research","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Tunable Resistive Pulse Sensing (TRPS) Technology for Particle Size Distribution in Vaccine Formulations – A Comparative Study with Dynamic Light Scattering\",\"authors\":\"Rahul Misra, Ginny Fung, Siddhant Sharma, Jian Hu, Marina Kirkitadze\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11095-024-03698-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>A comparative assessment was performed to evaluate the potential of particle sizing by an ensemble based conventional dynamic light scattering (DLS) technique and an emerging technology based on tunable resistive pulse sensing (TRPS) using particle by particle approach by evaluating three different types of vaccine formulations representing three case studies and showing the limitation of each technique, instrument variability, sensitivity, and the resolution in mixed population.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>Three types of in-house vaccine formulations- a protein antigen, an outer membrane vesicle and viral particles were simultaneously evaluated by TRPS based Exoid and two DLS instruments-Zetatrac and Zetasizer for particle size distribution, aggregates, and resolution of polydisperse species.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The data from first case study show the risk of possible size overestimation and size averaging in polydisperse samples in DLS measurements which can be addressed by the TRPS analysis. It also shows how TRPS may be utilized only to large size antigens due to its limited size range. The second case study highlights the difference in the sensitivities of two DLS instruments working on the same principle. The third case study show that how TRPS can better resolve the large aggregate species compare to DLS in polydisperse samples.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>This analysis shows that TRPS can be used as an orthogonal technique in addition to conventional DLS based methods for more precise and in-depth characterization. Both techniques are efficient in size characterization and produce comparable results, however the choice will depend on the type of formulation and size range to be evaluated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmaceutical Research\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmaceutical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-024-03698-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-024-03698-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 通过对代表三个案例研究的三种不同类型的疫苗制剂进行评估,并显示每种技术的局限性、仪器的可变性、灵敏度以及在混合群体中的分辨率,对基于集合的传统动态光散射(DLS)技术和基于可调电阻脉冲传感(TRPS)的新兴技术进行了比较评估。方法采用基于 TRPS 的 Exoid 和两台 DLS 仪器--Zetatrac 和 Zetasizer 同时评估三种内部疫苗制剂--蛋白质抗原、外膜囊泡和病毒颗粒--的粒度分布、聚集体和多分散物种的分辨率。它还表明,由于 TRPS 的粒度范围有限,因此只能用于大粒度抗原。第二个案例研究强调了两种基于相同原理的 DLS 仪器在灵敏度上的差异。第三项案例研究表明,与多分散样品中的 DLS 相比,TRPS 能够更好地分辨大颗粒物种。这两种技术在粒度表征方面都很有效,并能得出相似的结果,但选择哪种技术将取决于要评估的配方类型和粒度范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of Tunable Resistive Pulse Sensing (TRPS) Technology for Particle Size Distribution in Vaccine Formulations – A Comparative Study with Dynamic Light Scattering

Purpose

A comparative assessment was performed to evaluate the potential of particle sizing by an ensemble based conventional dynamic light scattering (DLS) technique and an emerging technology based on tunable resistive pulse sensing (TRPS) using particle by particle approach by evaluating three different types of vaccine formulations representing three case studies and showing the limitation of each technique, instrument variability, sensitivity, and the resolution in mixed population.

Methods

Three types of in-house vaccine formulations- a protein antigen, an outer membrane vesicle and viral particles were simultaneously evaluated by TRPS based Exoid and two DLS instruments-Zetatrac and Zetasizer for particle size distribution, aggregates, and resolution of polydisperse species.

Results

The data from first case study show the risk of possible size overestimation and size averaging in polydisperse samples in DLS measurements which can be addressed by the TRPS analysis. It also shows how TRPS may be utilized only to large size antigens due to its limited size range. The second case study highlights the difference in the sensitivities of two DLS instruments working on the same principle. The third case study show that how TRPS can better resolve the large aggregate species compare to DLS in polydisperse samples.

Conclusion

This analysis shows that TRPS can be used as an orthogonal technique in addition to conventional DLS based methods for more precise and in-depth characterization. Both techniques are efficient in size characterization and produce comparable results, however the choice will depend on the type of formulation and size range to be evaluated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Research
Pharmaceutical Research 医学-化学综合
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.40%
发文量
276
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Research, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, is committed to publishing novel research that is mechanism-based, hypothesis-driven and addresses significant issues in drug discovery, development and regulation. Current areas of interest include, but are not limited to: -(pre)formulation engineering and processing- computational biopharmaceutics- drug delivery and targeting- molecular biopharmaceutics and drug disposition (including cellular and molecular pharmacology)- pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenetics. Research may involve nonclinical and clinical studies, and utilize both in vitro and in vivo approaches. Studies on small drug molecules, pharmaceutical solid materials (including biomaterials, polymers and nanoparticles) biotechnology products (including genes, peptides, proteins and vaccines), and genetically engineered cells are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Assess Ritonavir-Digoxin Interactions and Recommendations for Co-Administration Regimens. Pharmacological Innovations in Space: Challenges and Future Perspectives. Regulatory Role of eIF2αK4 in Amino Acid Transporter Expression in Mouse Brain Capillary Endothelial Cells. Chemical Distribution Uniformity Assessment of "Intra-Tablet" by Hyperspectral Raman Imaging Analysis. The Current State of Biotransformation Science - Industry Survey of In Vitro and In Vivo Practices, Clinical Translation, and Future Trends.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1