AOP 报告:制定能量沉积导致白内障的不良后果途径

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis Pub Date : 2024-04-21 DOI:10.1002/em.22594
Emma Carrothers, Meghan Appleby, Vita Lai, Tatiana Kozbenko, Dalya Alomar, Benjamin J. Smith, Nobuyuki Hamada, Patricia Hinton, Elizabeth A. Ainsbury, Robyn Hocking, Carole Yauk, Ruth C. Wilkins, Vinita Chauhan
{"title":"AOP 报告:制定能量沉积导致白内障的不良后果途径","authors":"Emma Carrothers,&nbsp;Meghan Appleby,&nbsp;Vita Lai,&nbsp;Tatiana Kozbenko,&nbsp;Dalya Alomar,&nbsp;Benjamin J. Smith,&nbsp;Nobuyuki Hamada,&nbsp;Patricia Hinton,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Ainsbury,&nbsp;Robyn Hocking,&nbsp;Carole Yauk,&nbsp;Ruth C. Wilkins,&nbsp;Vinita Chauhan","doi":"10.1002/em.22594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cataracts are one of the leading causes of blindness, with an estimated 95 million people affected worldwide. A hallmark of cataract development is lens opacification, typically associated not only with aging but also radiation exposure as encountered by interventional radiologists and astronauts during the long-term space mission. To better understand radiation-induced cataracts, the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework was used to structure and evaluate knowledge across biological levels of organization (e.g., macromolecular, cell, tissue, organ, organism and population). AOPs identify a sequence of key events (KEs) causally connected by key event relationships (KERs) beginning with a molecular initiating event to an adverse outcome (AO) of relevance to regulatory decision-making. To construct the cataract AO and retrieve evidence to support it, a scoping review methodology was used to filter, screen, and review studies based on the modified Bradford Hill criteria. Eight KEs were identified that were moderately supported by empirical evidence (e.g., dose-, time-, incidence-concordance) across the adjacent (directly linked) relationships using well-established endpoints. Over half of the evidence to justify the KER linkages was derived from the evidence stream of biological plausibility. Early KEs of oxidative stress and protein modifications had strong linkages to downstream KEs and could be the focus of countermeasure development. Several identified knowledge gaps and inconsistencies related to the quantitative understanding of KERs which could be the basis of future research, most notably directed to experiments in the range of low or moderate doses and dose-rates, relevant to radiation workers and other occupational exposures.</p>","PeriodicalId":11791,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis","volume":"65 S3","pages":"31-56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/em.22594","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AOP report: Development of an adverse outcome pathway for deposition of energy leading to cataracts\",\"authors\":\"Emma Carrothers,&nbsp;Meghan Appleby,&nbsp;Vita Lai,&nbsp;Tatiana Kozbenko,&nbsp;Dalya Alomar,&nbsp;Benjamin J. Smith,&nbsp;Nobuyuki Hamada,&nbsp;Patricia Hinton,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Ainsbury,&nbsp;Robyn Hocking,&nbsp;Carole Yauk,&nbsp;Ruth C. Wilkins,&nbsp;Vinita Chauhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/em.22594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Cataracts are one of the leading causes of blindness, with an estimated 95 million people affected worldwide. A hallmark of cataract development is lens opacification, typically associated not only with aging but also radiation exposure as encountered by interventional radiologists and astronauts during the long-term space mission. To better understand radiation-induced cataracts, the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework was used to structure and evaluate knowledge across biological levels of organization (e.g., macromolecular, cell, tissue, organ, organism and population). AOPs identify a sequence of key events (KEs) causally connected by key event relationships (KERs) beginning with a molecular initiating event to an adverse outcome (AO) of relevance to regulatory decision-making. To construct the cataract AO and retrieve evidence to support it, a scoping review methodology was used to filter, screen, and review studies based on the modified Bradford Hill criteria. Eight KEs were identified that were moderately supported by empirical evidence (e.g., dose-, time-, incidence-concordance) across the adjacent (directly linked) relationships using well-established endpoints. Over half of the evidence to justify the KER linkages was derived from the evidence stream of biological plausibility. Early KEs of oxidative stress and protein modifications had strong linkages to downstream KEs and could be the focus of countermeasure development. Several identified knowledge gaps and inconsistencies related to the quantitative understanding of KERs which could be the basis of future research, most notably directed to experiments in the range of low or moderate doses and dose-rates, relevant to radiation workers and other occupational exposures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis\",\"volume\":\"65 S3\",\"pages\":\"31-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/em.22594\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/em.22594\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/em.22594","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

白内障是导致失明的主要原因之一,估计全球有 9500 万人患有白内障。白内障发展的一个标志是晶状体混浊,通常不仅与衰老有关,还与介入放射科医生和宇航员在长期太空任务中遇到的辐射照射有关。为了更好地了解辐射诱发的白内障,我们采用了不良后果途径(AOP)框架来构建和评估跨生物组织层次(如大分子、细胞、组织、器官、机体和群体)的知识。AOPs 确定了由关键事件关系(KERs)因果连接的关键事件(KEs)序列,从分子起始事件开始,直至与监管决策相关的不良结果(AO)。为了构建白内障 AO 并检索支持该 AO 的证据,我们采用了范围界定综述方法,根据修改后的 Bradford Hill 标准过滤、筛选和综述研究。通过经验证据(如剂量、时间、发病率的一致性),在使用成熟终点的相邻(直接关联)关系中,确定了八个关键绩效点。证明 KER 联系的证据有一半以上来自生物合理性证据流。氧化应激和蛋白质修饰的早期关键关联因素与下游关键关联因素有很强的联系,可以作为对策开发的重点。一些已确定的知识差距和不一致之处与对关键效应源的定量理解有关,可作为未来研究的基础,特别是针对与辐射工作者和其他职业辐照相关的低剂量或中等剂量和剂量率范围内的实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AOP report: Development of an adverse outcome pathway for deposition of energy leading to cataracts

Cataracts are one of the leading causes of blindness, with an estimated 95 million people affected worldwide. A hallmark of cataract development is lens opacification, typically associated not only with aging but also radiation exposure as encountered by interventional radiologists and astronauts during the long-term space mission. To better understand radiation-induced cataracts, the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework was used to structure and evaluate knowledge across biological levels of organization (e.g., macromolecular, cell, tissue, organ, organism and population). AOPs identify a sequence of key events (KEs) causally connected by key event relationships (KERs) beginning with a molecular initiating event to an adverse outcome (AO) of relevance to regulatory decision-making. To construct the cataract AO and retrieve evidence to support it, a scoping review methodology was used to filter, screen, and review studies based on the modified Bradford Hill criteria. Eight KEs were identified that were moderately supported by empirical evidence (e.g., dose-, time-, incidence-concordance) across the adjacent (directly linked) relationships using well-established endpoints. Over half of the evidence to justify the KER linkages was derived from the evidence stream of biological plausibility. Early KEs of oxidative stress and protein modifications had strong linkages to downstream KEs and could be the focus of countermeasure development. Several identified knowledge gaps and inconsistencies related to the quantitative understanding of KERs which could be the basis of future research, most notably directed to experiments in the range of low or moderate doses and dose-rates, relevant to radiation workers and other occupational exposures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.70%
发文量
52
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis publishes original research manuscripts, reviews and commentaries on topics related to six general areas, with an emphasis on subject matter most suited for the readership of EMM as outlined below. The journal is intended for investigators in fields such as molecular biology, biochemistry, microbiology, genetics and epigenetics, genomics and epigenomics, cancer research, neurobiology, heritable mutation, radiation biology, toxicology, and molecular & environmental epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the impact of different solvents in the bacterial reverse mutation test. Consensus findings of an International Workshops on Genotoxicity Testing workshop on using transcriptomic biomarkers to predict genotoxicity. Machine learning enhances genotoxicity assessment using MultiFlow® DNA damage assay. Genetic instability of a single exposure to sevoflurane at different concentrations in monitored mice. Outcome of IWGT workshop on transcriptomic biomarkers for genotoxicity: Key considerations for bioinformatics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1