用顺铂/吉西他滨预处理的晚期胆道癌患者的二线FOLFOX化疗:系统综述和荟萃分析

A. Digklia , D. Arnold , I.A. Voutsadakis
{"title":"用顺铂/吉西他滨预处理的晚期胆道癌患者的二线FOLFOX化疗:系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"A. Digklia ,&nbsp;D. Arnold ,&nbsp;I.A. Voutsadakis","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2024.100055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Biliary cancers are aggressive carcinomas frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage. Palliative combination systemic therapy provides survival benefits in the first-line setting of advanced and metastatic disease. FOLFOX chemotherapy is one of the few options in the second-line therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The medical literature was searched through the Medline/PubMed and Embase databases to acquire clinical reports or trials of FOLFOX treatment for biliary cancers in the second-line metastatic setting after first-line cisplatin/gemcitabine chemotherapy. Eligible prospective and retrospective studies were reviewed and included in a meta-analysis with overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) as outcomes of interest.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six clinical studies were eligible and included in the meta-analysis. The ORR with second-line FOLFOX chemotherapy in this population was 10.42% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.55% to 16.3%]. Two-fifths of the patients had stable disease for a DCR of 50.65% (95% CI 38.4% to 62.9%). The median PFS was 3.03 months (95% CI 1.38-4.09 months) and the median OS was 6.43 months (95% CI 5.43-7.43 months). The main grade 3/4 adverse effects observed in &gt;10% of patients were neutropenia (21.2%) and asthenia/fatigue (10.3%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The meta-analysis observed a moderate efficacy of the FOLFOX combination in this setting. These results may be used as a benchmark to compare gains obtained in this setting with novel treatments, including recently introduced targeted therapies in appropriately selected patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819824000165/pdfft?md5=c8d52ffa2793b1b75e9b284b1ac2b435&pid=1-s2.0-S2949819824000165-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Second-line FOLFOX chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancers pretreated with cisplatin/gemcitabine: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"A. Digklia ,&nbsp;D. Arnold ,&nbsp;I.A. Voutsadakis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esmogo.2024.100055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Biliary cancers are aggressive carcinomas frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage. Palliative combination systemic therapy provides survival benefits in the first-line setting of advanced and metastatic disease. FOLFOX chemotherapy is one of the few options in the second-line therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The medical literature was searched through the Medline/PubMed and Embase databases to acquire clinical reports or trials of FOLFOX treatment for biliary cancers in the second-line metastatic setting after first-line cisplatin/gemcitabine chemotherapy. Eligible prospective and retrospective studies were reviewed and included in a meta-analysis with overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) as outcomes of interest.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six clinical studies were eligible and included in the meta-analysis. The ORR with second-line FOLFOX chemotherapy in this population was 10.42% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.55% to 16.3%]. Two-fifths of the patients had stable disease for a DCR of 50.65% (95% CI 38.4% to 62.9%). The median PFS was 3.03 months (95% CI 1.38-4.09 months) and the median OS was 6.43 months (95% CI 5.43-7.43 months). The main grade 3/4 adverse effects observed in &gt;10% of patients were neutropenia (21.2%) and asthenia/fatigue (10.3%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The meta-analysis observed a moderate efficacy of the FOLFOX combination in this setting. These results may be used as a benchmark to compare gains obtained in this setting with novel treatments, including recently introduced targeted therapies in appropriately selected patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819824000165/pdfft?md5=c8d52ffa2793b1b75e9b284b1ac2b435&pid=1-s2.0-S2949819824000165-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819824000165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819824000165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景胆道癌是一种侵袭性癌症,经常在晚期诊断出来。在晚期和转移性疾病的一线治疗中,姑息性联合系统治疗可提高生存率。材料与方法通过Medline/PubMed和Embase数据库检索医学文献,以获得在一线顺铂/吉西他滨化疗后二线转移性胆道癌FOLFOX治疗的临床报告或试验。对符合条件的前瞻性和回顾性研究进行了审查,并以总反应率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)作为研究结果纳入荟萃分析。在这些人群中,二线FOLFOX化疗的ORR为10.42%[95%置信区间(CI)为4.55%至16.3%]。五分之二的患者病情稳定,DCR 为 50.65%(95% 置信区间为 38.4% 至 62.9%)。中位PFS为3.03个月(95% CI为1.38-4.09个月),中位OS为6.43个月(95% CI为5.43-7.43个月)。在>10%的患者中观察到的3/4级不良反应主要是中性粒细胞减少(21.2%)和气喘/疲劳(10.3%)。荟萃分析观察到 FOLFOX 联合疗法在这种情况下具有中等疗效。这些结果可作为基准,用于比较在这种情况下与新型疗法(包括最近在适当选择的患者中引入的靶向疗法)的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Second-line FOLFOX chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancers pretreated with cisplatin/gemcitabine: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Biliary cancers are aggressive carcinomas frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage. Palliative combination systemic therapy provides survival benefits in the first-line setting of advanced and metastatic disease. FOLFOX chemotherapy is one of the few options in the second-line therapy.

Materials and methods

The medical literature was searched through the Medline/PubMed and Embase databases to acquire clinical reports or trials of FOLFOX treatment for biliary cancers in the second-line metastatic setting after first-line cisplatin/gemcitabine chemotherapy. Eligible prospective and retrospective studies were reviewed and included in a meta-analysis with overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) as outcomes of interest.

Results

Six clinical studies were eligible and included in the meta-analysis. The ORR with second-line FOLFOX chemotherapy in this population was 10.42% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.55% to 16.3%]. Two-fifths of the patients had stable disease for a DCR of 50.65% (95% CI 38.4% to 62.9%). The median PFS was 3.03 months (95% CI 1.38-4.09 months) and the median OS was 6.43 months (95% CI 5.43-7.43 months). The main grade 3/4 adverse effects observed in >10% of patients were neutropenia (21.2%) and asthenia/fatigue (10.3%).

Conclusions

The meta-analysis observed a moderate efficacy of the FOLFOX combination in this setting. These results may be used as a benchmark to compare gains obtained in this setting with novel treatments, including recently introduced targeted therapies in appropriately selected patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gastric cancer hospital-based registry: real-world gastric cancer data from Latin America and Europe Geriatric Assessment-guided therapy modification and outcomes in patients with non-metastatic gastroesophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study☆ Table of Contents Editorial Board PRABITAS study design: a pragmatic, randomized phase III trial of bi-weekly versus conventional trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1