Comparing 2-dimensional versus 3-dimensional MR myelography for cerebrospinal fluid leak detection

Purpose

We compared cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak conspicuity and image quality as visualized using 3D versus 2D magnetic resonance (MR) myelography in patients with spinal CSF leaks.

Methods

Eighteen patients underwent spinal MR imaging at 3 Tesla. Three board-certified radiologists independently evaluated CSF leak conspicuity and image quality on a 4-point scale; the latter assessed by scoring fat suppression, venous visualization, and severity of CSF flow artifacts. Additionally, the evaluators ranked the overall performances of 2D versus 3D MR myelography upon completing side-by-side comparisons of CSF leak conspicuity. Inter-reader agreement was determined using the Gwet’s AC1.

Results

The quality of 3D MR myelography images was significantly better than that of 2D MR myelography with respect to CSF leak conspicuity (mean scores: 3.3 vs. 1.9, p < 0.0001) and severity of CSF flow artifacts on the axial view (mean scores: 1.0 vs. 2.5, p = 0.0001). Inter-reader agreement was moderate to almost perfect for 2D MR myelography (AC1 = 0.55–1.00), and almost perfect for 3D MR myelography (AC1 = 0.85–1.00). Moreover, 3D MR myelography was judged to be superior to 2D acquisition in 78 %, 83 %, and 83 % of the samples per readers 1, 2 and 3, respectively; the inter-reader agreement was almost perfect (AC1: reader 1 vs. 2; 0.98, reader 2 vs. 3; 0.96, reader 3 vs. 1; 0.98).

Conclusion

CSF leaks are more conspicuous when using 3D MR myelography than when using its 2D counterpart; therefore, the former is more reliable for identifying such leaks.