疑似小肠出血的人工智能辅助胶囊内镜阅读:一项多中心前瞻性研究

IF 23.8 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Lancet Digital Health Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI:10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00048-7
Prof Cristiano Spada MD PhD , Stefania Piccirelli MD , Prof Cesare Hassan MD PhD , Clarissa Ferrari PhD , Ervin Toth MD PhD , Begoña González-Suárez MD PhD , Martin Keuchel MD PhD , Marc McAlindon MD PhD , Ádám Finta MD , András Rosztóczy MD PhD , Prof Xavier Dray MD PhD , Daniele Salvi MD , Maria Elena Riccioni MD PhD , Robert Benamouzig MD PhD , Amit Chattree MD , Adam Humphries MD PhD , Prof Jean-Christophe Saurin MD PhD , Edward J Despott MD PhD , Alberto Murino MD , Gabriele Wurm Johansson , Prof Guido Costamagna MD PhD
{"title":"疑似小肠出血的人工智能辅助胶囊内镜阅读:一项多中心前瞻性研究","authors":"Prof Cristiano Spada MD PhD ,&nbsp;Stefania Piccirelli MD ,&nbsp;Prof Cesare Hassan MD PhD ,&nbsp;Clarissa Ferrari PhD ,&nbsp;Ervin Toth MD PhD ,&nbsp;Begoña González-Suárez MD PhD ,&nbsp;Martin Keuchel MD PhD ,&nbsp;Marc McAlindon MD PhD ,&nbsp;Ádám Finta MD ,&nbsp;András Rosztóczy MD PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Xavier Dray MD PhD ,&nbsp;Daniele Salvi MD ,&nbsp;Maria Elena Riccioni MD PhD ,&nbsp;Robert Benamouzig MD PhD ,&nbsp;Amit Chattree MD ,&nbsp;Adam Humphries MD PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Jean-Christophe Saurin MD PhD ,&nbsp;Edward J Despott MD PhD ,&nbsp;Alberto Murino MD ,&nbsp;Gabriele Wurm Johansson ,&nbsp;Prof Guido Costamagna MD PhD","doi":"10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00048-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Capsule endoscopy reading is time consuming, and readers are required to maintain attention so as not to miss significant findings. Deep convolutional neural networks can recognise relevant findings, possibly exceeding human performances and reducing the reading time of capsule endoscopy. Our primary aim was to assess the non-inferiority of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted reading versus standard reading for potentially small bowel bleeding lesions (high P2, moderate P1; Saurin classification) at per-patient analysis. The mean reading time in both reading modalities was evaluated among the secondary endpoints.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients aged 18 years or older with suspected small bowel bleeding (with anaemia with or without melena or haematochezia, and negative bidirectional endoscopy) were prospectively enrolled at 14 European centres. Patients underwent small bowel capsule endoscopy with the Navicam SB system (Ankon, China), which is provided with a deep neural network-based AI system (ProScan) for automatic detection of lesions. Initial reading was performed in standard reading mode. Second blinded reading was performed with AI assistance (the AI operated a first-automated reading, and only AI-selected images were assessed by human readers). The primary endpoint was to assess the non-inferiority of AI-assisted reading versus standard reading in the detection (diagnostic yield) of potentially small bowel bleeding P1 and P2 lesions in a per-patient analysis. This study is registered with <span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg>, <span>NCT04821349</span><svg><path></path></svg>.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>From Feb 17, 2021 to Dec 29, 2021, 137 patients were prospectively enrolled. 133 patients were included in the final analysis (73 [55%] female, mean age 66·5 years [SD 14·4]; 112 [84%] completed capsule endoscopy). At per-patient analysis, the diagnostic yield of P1 and P2 lesions in AI-assisted reading (98 [73·7%] of 133 lesions) was non-inferior (p&lt;0·0001) and superior (p=0·0213) to standard reading (82 [62·4%] of 133; 95% CI 3·6–19·0). Mean small bowel reading time was 33·7 min (SD 22·9) in standard reading and 3·8 min (3·3) in AI-assisted reading (p&lt;0·0001).</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>AI-assisted reading might provide more accurate and faster detection of clinically relevant small bowel bleeding lesions than standard reading.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>ANKON Technologies, China and AnX Robotica, USA provided the NaviCam SB system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48534,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Digital Health","volume":"6 5","pages":"Pages e345-e353"},"PeriodicalIF":23.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750024000487/pdfft?md5=71adf0dd8695092a27675c17467d9f94&pid=1-s2.0-S2589750024000487-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI-assisted capsule endoscopy reading in suspected small bowel bleeding: a multicentre prospective study\",\"authors\":\"Prof Cristiano Spada MD PhD ,&nbsp;Stefania Piccirelli MD ,&nbsp;Prof Cesare Hassan MD PhD ,&nbsp;Clarissa Ferrari PhD ,&nbsp;Ervin Toth MD PhD ,&nbsp;Begoña González-Suárez MD PhD ,&nbsp;Martin Keuchel MD PhD ,&nbsp;Marc McAlindon MD PhD ,&nbsp;Ádám Finta MD ,&nbsp;András Rosztóczy MD PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Xavier Dray MD PhD ,&nbsp;Daniele Salvi MD ,&nbsp;Maria Elena Riccioni MD PhD ,&nbsp;Robert Benamouzig MD PhD ,&nbsp;Amit Chattree MD ,&nbsp;Adam Humphries MD PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Jean-Christophe Saurin MD PhD ,&nbsp;Edward J Despott MD PhD ,&nbsp;Alberto Murino MD ,&nbsp;Gabriele Wurm Johansson ,&nbsp;Prof Guido Costamagna MD PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00048-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Capsule endoscopy reading is time consuming, and readers are required to maintain attention so as not to miss significant findings. Deep convolutional neural networks can recognise relevant findings, possibly exceeding human performances and reducing the reading time of capsule endoscopy. Our primary aim was to assess the non-inferiority of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted reading versus standard reading for potentially small bowel bleeding lesions (high P2, moderate P1; Saurin classification) at per-patient analysis. The mean reading time in both reading modalities was evaluated among the secondary endpoints.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients aged 18 years or older with suspected small bowel bleeding (with anaemia with or without melena or haematochezia, and negative bidirectional endoscopy) were prospectively enrolled at 14 European centres. Patients underwent small bowel capsule endoscopy with the Navicam SB system (Ankon, China), which is provided with a deep neural network-based AI system (ProScan) for automatic detection of lesions. Initial reading was performed in standard reading mode. Second blinded reading was performed with AI assistance (the AI operated a first-automated reading, and only AI-selected images were assessed by human readers). The primary endpoint was to assess the non-inferiority of AI-assisted reading versus standard reading in the detection (diagnostic yield) of potentially small bowel bleeding P1 and P2 lesions in a per-patient analysis. This study is registered with <span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg>, <span>NCT04821349</span><svg><path></path></svg>.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>From Feb 17, 2021 to Dec 29, 2021, 137 patients were prospectively enrolled. 133 patients were included in the final analysis (73 [55%] female, mean age 66·5 years [SD 14·4]; 112 [84%] completed capsule endoscopy). At per-patient analysis, the diagnostic yield of P1 and P2 lesions in AI-assisted reading (98 [73·7%] of 133 lesions) was non-inferior (p&lt;0·0001) and superior (p=0·0213) to standard reading (82 [62·4%] of 133; 95% CI 3·6–19·0). Mean small bowel reading time was 33·7 min (SD 22·9) in standard reading and 3·8 min (3·3) in AI-assisted reading (p&lt;0·0001).</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>AI-assisted reading might provide more accurate and faster detection of clinically relevant small bowel bleeding lesions than standard reading.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>ANKON Technologies, China and AnX Robotica, USA provided the NaviCam SB system.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Digital Health\",\"volume\":\"6 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages e345-e353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":23.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750024000487/pdfft?md5=71adf0dd8695092a27675c17467d9f94&pid=1-s2.0-S2589750024000487-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Digital Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750024000487\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Digital Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750024000487","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景胶囊内镜阅读耗时,阅读者需要保持注意力,以免错过重要发现。深度卷积神经网络可以识别相关的检查结果,可能会超过人类的表现,缩短胶囊内镜检查的阅读时间。我们的主要目的是评估人工智能(AI)辅助阅读与标准阅读对潜在小肠出血病变(高P2、中P1;Saurin分类)的非劣效性。方法14个欧洲中心前瞻性地招募了18岁或18岁以上疑似小肠出血患者(贫血伴或不伴有血便或血崩,双向内镜检查阴性)。患者使用 Navicam SB 系统(中国安康)进行小肠胶囊内镜检查,该系统配备了基于深度神经网络的人工智能系统(ProScan),可自动检测病变。初始读片在标准读片模式下进行。第二次盲读在人工智能辅助下进行(人工智能操作第一次自动读片,人类读片员只对人工智能选择的图像进行评估)。主要终点是评估人工智能辅助读片与标准读片相比,在每个患者分析中,在检测潜在小肠出血 P1 和 P2 病变(诊断率)方面的非劣效性。本研究已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT04821349。研究结果从 2021 年 2 月 17 日到 2021 年 12 月 29 日,137 名患者进行了前瞻性登记。133名患者被纳入最终分析(73名[55%]女性,平均年龄66-5岁[SD 14-4];112名[84%]完成了胶囊内镜检查)。按患者分析,人工智能辅助读片的 P1 和 P2 病变诊断率(133 例病变中的 98 [73-7%] 例)不劣于标准读片(133 例病变中的 82 [62-4%] 例;95% CI 3-6-19-0)(p<0-0001),优于标准读片(p=0-0213)。标准阅读的平均小肠阅读时间为 33-7 分钟(SD 22-9),人工智能辅助阅读的平均小肠阅读时间为 3-8 分钟(3-3)(p<0-0001).Interpretation 人工智能辅助阅读可能比标准阅读更准确、更快速地检测出临床相关的小肠出血病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AI-assisted capsule endoscopy reading in suspected small bowel bleeding: a multicentre prospective study

Background

Capsule endoscopy reading is time consuming, and readers are required to maintain attention so as not to miss significant findings. Deep convolutional neural networks can recognise relevant findings, possibly exceeding human performances and reducing the reading time of capsule endoscopy. Our primary aim was to assess the non-inferiority of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted reading versus standard reading for potentially small bowel bleeding lesions (high P2, moderate P1; Saurin classification) at per-patient analysis. The mean reading time in both reading modalities was evaluated among the secondary endpoints.

Methods

Patients aged 18 years or older with suspected small bowel bleeding (with anaemia with or without melena or haematochezia, and negative bidirectional endoscopy) were prospectively enrolled at 14 European centres. Patients underwent small bowel capsule endoscopy with the Navicam SB system (Ankon, China), which is provided with a deep neural network-based AI system (ProScan) for automatic detection of lesions. Initial reading was performed in standard reading mode. Second blinded reading was performed with AI assistance (the AI operated a first-automated reading, and only AI-selected images were assessed by human readers). The primary endpoint was to assess the non-inferiority of AI-assisted reading versus standard reading in the detection (diagnostic yield) of potentially small bowel bleeding P1 and P2 lesions in a per-patient analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04821349.

Findings

From Feb 17, 2021 to Dec 29, 2021, 137 patients were prospectively enrolled. 133 patients were included in the final analysis (73 [55%] female, mean age 66·5 years [SD 14·4]; 112 [84%] completed capsule endoscopy). At per-patient analysis, the diagnostic yield of P1 and P2 lesions in AI-assisted reading (98 [73·7%] of 133 lesions) was non-inferior (p<0·0001) and superior (p=0·0213) to standard reading (82 [62·4%] of 133; 95% CI 3·6–19·0). Mean small bowel reading time was 33·7 min (SD 22·9) in standard reading and 3·8 min (3·3) in AI-assisted reading (p<0·0001).

Interpretation

AI-assisted reading might provide more accurate and faster detection of clinically relevant small bowel bleeding lesions than standard reading.

Funding

ANKON Technologies, China and AnX Robotica, USA provided the NaviCam SB system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
232
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Digital Health publishes important, innovative, and practice-changing research on any topic connected with digital technology in clinical medicine, public health, and global health. The journal’s open access content crosses subject boundaries, building bridges between health professionals and researchers.By bringing together the most important advances in this multidisciplinary field,The Lancet Digital Health is the most prominent publishing venue in digital health. We publish a range of content types including Articles,Review, Comment, and Correspondence, contributing to promoting digital technologies in health practice worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Attitudes and perceptions of medical researchers towards the use of artificial intelligence chatbots in the scientific process: an international cross-sectional survey. Building robust, proportionate, and timely approaches to regulation and evaluation of digital mental health technologies. Advancing the management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal infection through harnessing digital health innovations. Innovative diagnostic technologies: navigating regulatory frameworks through advances, challenges, and future prospects. Using digital health technologies to optimise antimicrobial use globally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1