含部分或大量水解牛奶蛋白的婴儿配方奶粉用于预防过敏性疾病:临床试验的系统回顾和元分析

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Advances in Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100217
Xiaoxu Li , Tingchao He , Sufang Duan , Jinghong Liang , Gang Feng , Fang Li , Zhenyu Shen , Wenhui Ye , Biao Liu , Bibo Jiang , Yujing Chen , Nan Liu , Ignatius Man-Yau Szeto , Li Cai
{"title":"含部分或大量水解牛奶蛋白的婴儿配方奶粉用于预防过敏性疾病:临床试验的系统回顾和元分析","authors":"Xiaoxu Li ,&nbsp;Tingchao He ,&nbsp;Sufang Duan ,&nbsp;Jinghong Liang ,&nbsp;Gang Feng ,&nbsp;Fang Li ,&nbsp;Zhenyu Shen ,&nbsp;Wenhui Ye ,&nbsp;Biao Liu ,&nbsp;Bibo Jiang ,&nbsp;Yujing Chen ,&nbsp;Nan Liu ,&nbsp;Ignatius Man-Yau Szeto ,&nbsp;Li Cai","doi":"10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the widely recommended usage of partially hydrolyzed formula (PHF) or extensively hydrolyzed formula (EHF) of milk protein for preventing allergic diseases (ADs), clinical studies have been inconclusive regarding their efficacy compared with that of cow's milk formula (CMF) or breast milk (BM). We aimed to systematically evaluate the effects of PHF or EHF compared with those of CMF or BM on risk of ADs (cow's milk allergy, allergic rhinitis, eczema, asthma, wheeze, food allergy, and sensitization) in children. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for clinical trials published from inception to 21 October, 2022. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to grade the strength of evidence. Overall, 24 trials (10,950 infants) were included, 17 of which specifically included high-risk infants. GRADE was low for the evidence that, compared with CMF, infants early fed with EHF had lower risk of cow's milk allergy at age 0–2 y [relative risk (RR): 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39, 0.99]. Moderate evidence supported that PHF and EHF reduced risk of eczema in children aged younger or older than 2 y, respectively (RR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.52, 0.96; and RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.67, 0.94, respectively). We also identified moderate systematic evidence indicating that PHF reduced risk of wheeze at age 0–2 y compared with CMF (RR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.85), but PHF and EHF increased the risk compared with BM (RR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.11, 2.31; and RR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.26, 2.14). Neither PHF nor EHF had significant effects on other ADs in children of any age. In conclusion, compared with CMF, PHF, or EHF had different preventive effect on cow's milk allergy, eczema, and wheeze. Compared with BM, both PHF and EHF may increase risk of wheeze but not other ADs. Given that most trials included only high-risk infants, more research on non–high-risk infants is warranted before any generalization is attempted.</p><p>This protocol was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42022320787.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7349,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Nutrition","volume":"15 5","pages":"Article 100217"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2161831324000516/pdfft?md5=d2b395c60dee7ab0923ddd7b9ac58b44&pid=1-s2.0-S2161831324000516-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infant Formulas With Partially or Extensively Hydrolyzed Milk Proteins for the Prevention of Allergic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoxu Li ,&nbsp;Tingchao He ,&nbsp;Sufang Duan ,&nbsp;Jinghong Liang ,&nbsp;Gang Feng ,&nbsp;Fang Li ,&nbsp;Zhenyu Shen ,&nbsp;Wenhui Ye ,&nbsp;Biao Liu ,&nbsp;Bibo Jiang ,&nbsp;Yujing Chen ,&nbsp;Nan Liu ,&nbsp;Ignatius Man-Yau Szeto ,&nbsp;Li Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite the widely recommended usage of partially hydrolyzed formula (PHF) or extensively hydrolyzed formula (EHF) of milk protein for preventing allergic diseases (ADs), clinical studies have been inconclusive regarding their efficacy compared with that of cow's milk formula (CMF) or breast milk (BM). We aimed to systematically evaluate the effects of PHF or EHF compared with those of CMF or BM on risk of ADs (cow's milk allergy, allergic rhinitis, eczema, asthma, wheeze, food allergy, and sensitization) in children. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for clinical trials published from inception to 21 October, 2022. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to grade the strength of evidence. Overall, 24 trials (10,950 infants) were included, 17 of which specifically included high-risk infants. GRADE was low for the evidence that, compared with CMF, infants early fed with EHF had lower risk of cow's milk allergy at age 0–2 y [relative risk (RR): 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39, 0.99]. Moderate evidence supported that PHF and EHF reduced risk of eczema in children aged younger or older than 2 y, respectively (RR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.52, 0.96; and RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.67, 0.94, respectively). We also identified moderate systematic evidence indicating that PHF reduced risk of wheeze at age 0–2 y compared with CMF (RR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.85), but PHF and EHF increased the risk compared with BM (RR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.11, 2.31; and RR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.26, 2.14). Neither PHF nor EHF had significant effects on other ADs in children of any age. In conclusion, compared with CMF, PHF, or EHF had different preventive effect on cow's milk allergy, eczema, and wheeze. Compared with BM, both PHF and EHF may increase risk of wheeze but not other ADs. Given that most trials included only high-risk infants, more research on non–high-risk infants is warranted before any generalization is attempted.</p><p>This protocol was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42022320787.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 100217\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2161831324000516/pdfft?md5=d2b395c60dee7ab0923ddd7b9ac58b44&pid=1-s2.0-S2161831324000516-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2161831324000516\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2161831324000516","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管人们广泛推荐使用牛奶蛋白部分水解配方奶粉(PHF)或广泛水解配方奶粉(EHF)来预防过敏性疾病(ADs),但与牛奶配方奶粉(CMF)或母乳(BM)相比,临床研究对其疗效并无定论。我们的目的是系统评估 PHF 或 EHF 与 CMF 或 BM 相比对儿童 ADs(牛奶过敏、过敏性鼻炎、湿疹、哮喘、喘息、食物过敏和致敏)风险的影响。我们在 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library 和 Web of Science 中检索了从开始到 2022 年 10 月 21 日发表的临床试验。我们采用建议评估、发展和评价分级法(GRADE)对证据的强度进行了分级。总共纳入了 24 项试验(10,950 名婴儿),其中 17 项试验特别纳入了高风险婴儿。有证据表明,与 CMF 相比,早期喂养 EHF 的婴儿在 0-2 岁时发生牛奶过敏的风险较低[相对风险 (RR):0.62;95% CI:0.39, 0.99],该证据的 GRADE 值较低。中度证据支持 PHF 和 EHF 可分别降低 2 岁以下或 2 岁以上儿童患湿疹的风险(RR:0.71;95% CI:0.52,0.96;RR:0.79;95% CI:0.67,0.94)。我们还发现中度系统性证据表明,与 CMF 相比,PHF 可降低 0-2 岁患喘鸣症的风险(RR:0.50;95% CI:0.29,0.85),但与 BM 相比,PHF 和 EHF 会增加患喘鸣症的风险(RR:1.61;95% CI:1.11,2.31;RR:1.64;95% CI:1.26,2.14)。PHF和EHF对任何年龄儿童的其他AD均无明显影响。总之,与CMF相比,PHF或EHF对牛奶过敏、湿疹和喘息有不同的预防效果。与 BM 相比,PHF 和 EHF 可能会增加患喘息的风险,但不会增加其他 ADs 的风险。鉴于大多数试验只纳入了高风险婴儿,因此在试图进行任何推广之前,有必要对非高风险婴儿进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Infant Formulas With Partially or Extensively Hydrolyzed Milk Proteins for the Prevention of Allergic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

Despite the widely recommended usage of partially hydrolyzed formula (PHF) or extensively hydrolyzed formula (EHF) of milk protein for preventing allergic diseases (ADs), clinical studies have been inconclusive regarding their efficacy compared with that of cow's milk formula (CMF) or breast milk (BM). We aimed to systematically evaluate the effects of PHF or EHF compared with those of CMF or BM on risk of ADs (cow's milk allergy, allergic rhinitis, eczema, asthma, wheeze, food allergy, and sensitization) in children. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for clinical trials published from inception to 21 October, 2022. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to grade the strength of evidence. Overall, 24 trials (10,950 infants) were included, 17 of which specifically included high-risk infants. GRADE was low for the evidence that, compared with CMF, infants early fed with EHF had lower risk of cow's milk allergy at age 0–2 y [relative risk (RR): 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39, 0.99]. Moderate evidence supported that PHF and EHF reduced risk of eczema in children aged younger or older than 2 y, respectively (RR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.52, 0.96; and RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.67, 0.94, respectively). We also identified moderate systematic evidence indicating that PHF reduced risk of wheeze at age 0–2 y compared with CMF (RR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.85), but PHF and EHF increased the risk compared with BM (RR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.11, 2.31; and RR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.26, 2.14). Neither PHF nor EHF had significant effects on other ADs in children of any age. In conclusion, compared with CMF, PHF, or EHF had different preventive effect on cow's milk allergy, eczema, and wheeze. Compared with BM, both PHF and EHF may increase risk of wheeze but not other ADs. Given that most trials included only high-risk infants, more research on non–high-risk infants is warranted before any generalization is attempted.

This protocol was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42022320787.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Nutrition
Advances in Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
2.20%
发文量
117
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Advances in Nutrition (AN/Adv Nutr) publishes focused reviews on pivotal findings and recent research across all domains relevant to nutritional scientists and biomedical researchers. This encompasses nutrition-related research spanning biochemical, molecular, and genetic studies using experimental animal models, domestic animals, and human subjects. The journal also emphasizes clinical nutrition, epidemiology and public health, and nutrition education. Review articles concentrate on recent progress rather than broad historical developments. In addition to review articles, AN includes Perspectives, Letters to the Editor, and supplements. Supplement proposals require pre-approval by the editor before submission. The journal features reports and position papers from the American Society for Nutrition, summaries of major government and foundation reports, and Nutrient Information briefs providing crucial details about dietary requirements, food sources, deficiencies, and other essential nutrient information. All submissions with scientific content undergo peer review by the Editors or their designees prior to acceptance for publication.
期刊最新文献
Generating the Best Available Science and Data to Inform Healthy Food Environment Policy Carnitine Are Lean Body Mass and Fat-Free Mass the Same or Different Body Components? A Critical Perspective Outside Front Cover Editorial board/publication information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1