双重伤害:荷兰一家精神病院强制收治的成年人中对他人的暴力行为和自我伤害行为

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q1 LAW International Journal of Law and Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI:10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.101989
Philip J.S. Michielsen , Sander Hoogveldt , Nordin L'oihmi , Sascha Sneep , Arno van Dam , Cornelius L. Mulder , Witte J.G. Hoogendijk , Sabine J. Roza
{"title":"双重伤害:荷兰一家精神病院强制收治的成年人中对他人的暴力行为和自我伤害行为","authors":"Philip J.S. Michielsen ,&nbsp;Sander Hoogveldt ,&nbsp;Nordin L'oihmi ,&nbsp;Sascha Sneep ,&nbsp;Arno van Dam ,&nbsp;Cornelius L. Mulder ,&nbsp;Witte J.G. Hoogendijk ,&nbsp;Sabine J. Roza","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.101989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Verbal and physical violence in psychiatric hospitals can have harmful consequences for staff members, such as physical injury, traumatisation, and sick leave, and they often accompany involuntary admission. Harm to others may co-occur with self-harm, i.e., dual harm. However, little is known about the association between dual-harm and violent behaviour towards staff members and its clinical outcomes, such as seclusion and rapid tranquilisation after involuntary admission to a psychiatric inpatient unit.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A convenience sample of patients admitted involuntarily (<em>N</em> = 384; mean age = 48.03, SD = 19.92) between January 2016 and December 2019 in Western Brabant, the Netherlands, was used to design a retrospective file audit. Distinct harm groups, marked by the presence/absence of self- and/or other-harm, were investigated using multivariate linear regression modelling on the seriousness of violent acts and the total length of admission. Logistic regression analyses were used to study the association between harm groups and the administration of rapid tranquilisation, seclusion, and extended involuntary admissions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Several harm groups were identified, including self-harm only, other-harm only, and dual-harm groups. Psychiatric patients admitted to the hospital because of (the risk of) violence towards others had a higher risk of violent incidents during admission and some restrictive measures. In a subgroup of patients with psychotic disorders, patients with dual harm committed the most serious violent incidents compared to those in the other harm groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Distinct harm groups were identified in a sample of involuntarily admitted patients. In a general adult psychiatric setting, patients at risk for violent behaviour, especially dual-harm patients, should be identified and monitored as part of the risk assessment. Future research is needed to explore more clinical correlates in the proposed distinction between harmful groups and to assess long-term prognosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47930,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 101989"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160252724000384/pdfft?md5=16b2e51249ac275dee625b47ec689548&pid=1-s2.0-S0160252724000384-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual harm: Violent behaviour to others and self-harm behaviour in adults compulsorily admitted to a Dutch psychiatric hospital\",\"authors\":\"Philip J.S. Michielsen ,&nbsp;Sander Hoogveldt ,&nbsp;Nordin L'oihmi ,&nbsp;Sascha Sneep ,&nbsp;Arno van Dam ,&nbsp;Cornelius L. Mulder ,&nbsp;Witte J.G. Hoogendijk ,&nbsp;Sabine J. Roza\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.101989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Verbal and physical violence in psychiatric hospitals can have harmful consequences for staff members, such as physical injury, traumatisation, and sick leave, and they often accompany involuntary admission. Harm to others may co-occur with self-harm, i.e., dual harm. However, little is known about the association between dual-harm and violent behaviour towards staff members and its clinical outcomes, such as seclusion and rapid tranquilisation after involuntary admission to a psychiatric inpatient unit.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A convenience sample of patients admitted involuntarily (<em>N</em> = 384; mean age = 48.03, SD = 19.92) between January 2016 and December 2019 in Western Brabant, the Netherlands, was used to design a retrospective file audit. Distinct harm groups, marked by the presence/absence of self- and/or other-harm, were investigated using multivariate linear regression modelling on the seriousness of violent acts and the total length of admission. Logistic regression analyses were used to study the association between harm groups and the administration of rapid tranquilisation, seclusion, and extended involuntary admissions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Several harm groups were identified, including self-harm only, other-harm only, and dual-harm groups. Psychiatric patients admitted to the hospital because of (the risk of) violence towards others had a higher risk of violent incidents during admission and some restrictive measures. In a subgroup of patients with psychotic disorders, patients with dual harm committed the most serious violent incidents compared to those in the other harm groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Distinct harm groups were identified in a sample of involuntarily admitted patients. In a general adult psychiatric setting, patients at risk for violent behaviour, especially dual-harm patients, should be identified and monitored as part of the risk assessment. Future research is needed to explore more clinical correlates in the proposed distinction between harmful groups and to assess long-term prognosis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"94 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101989\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160252724000384/pdfft?md5=16b2e51249ac275dee625b47ec689548&pid=1-s2.0-S0160252724000384-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160252724000384\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160252724000384","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景精神病院中的言语暴力和肢体暴力会对工作人员造成伤害,如身体伤害、精神创伤和病假,而且往往伴随着非自愿入院。对他人的伤害可能与自我伤害同时发生,即双重伤害。然而,人们对双重伤害与针对工作人员的暴力行为之间的关联及其临床结果知之甚少,如非自愿入住精神病住院部后的隔离和快速镇静。方法采用荷兰西布拉班特省 2016 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间非自愿入院患者(N = 384;平均年龄 = 48.03,SD = 19.92)的便利样本,设计了一项回顾性档案审计。通过对暴力行为的严重程度和入院总时间进行多变量线性回归建模,研究了以存在/不存在自我伤害和/或其他伤害为标志的不同伤害组别。结果确定了几个伤害组别,包括仅有自我伤害组别、仅有他害组别和双重伤害组别。因(有可能)对他人施暴而入院的精神病患者在入院期间发生暴力事件和采取某些限制性措施的风险较高。在患有精神障碍的亚组患者中,与其他伤害组的患者相比,具有双重伤害的患者实施的暴力事件最为严重。在普通成人精神病院中,有暴力行为风险的患者,尤其是有双重伤害的患者,应作为风险评估的一部分加以识别和监控。未来的研究还需要探索更多临床相关因素,以区分所提出的伤害群体,并评估长期预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dual harm: Violent behaviour to others and self-harm behaviour in adults compulsorily admitted to a Dutch psychiatric hospital

Background

Verbal and physical violence in psychiatric hospitals can have harmful consequences for staff members, such as physical injury, traumatisation, and sick leave, and they often accompany involuntary admission. Harm to others may co-occur with self-harm, i.e., dual harm. However, little is known about the association between dual-harm and violent behaviour towards staff members and its clinical outcomes, such as seclusion and rapid tranquilisation after involuntary admission to a psychiatric inpatient unit.

Method

A convenience sample of patients admitted involuntarily (N = 384; mean age = 48.03, SD = 19.92) between January 2016 and December 2019 in Western Brabant, the Netherlands, was used to design a retrospective file audit. Distinct harm groups, marked by the presence/absence of self- and/or other-harm, were investigated using multivariate linear regression modelling on the seriousness of violent acts and the total length of admission. Logistic regression analyses were used to study the association between harm groups and the administration of rapid tranquilisation, seclusion, and extended involuntary admissions.

Results

Several harm groups were identified, including self-harm only, other-harm only, and dual-harm groups. Psychiatric patients admitted to the hospital because of (the risk of) violence towards others had a higher risk of violent incidents during admission and some restrictive measures. In a subgroup of patients with psychotic disorders, patients with dual harm committed the most serious violent incidents compared to those in the other harm groups.

Conclusion

Distinct harm groups were identified in a sample of involuntarily admitted patients. In a general adult psychiatric setting, patients at risk for violent behaviour, especially dual-harm patients, should be identified and monitored as part of the risk assessment. Future research is needed to explore more clinical correlates in the proposed distinction between harmful groups and to assess long-term prognosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Law and Psychiatry is intended to provide a multi-disciplinary forum for the exchange of ideas and information among professionals concerned with the interface of law and psychiatry. There is a growing awareness of the need for exploring the fundamental goals of both the legal and psychiatric systems and the social implications of their interaction. The journal seeks to enhance understanding and cooperation in the field through the varied approaches represented, not only by law and psychiatry, but also by the social sciences and related disciplines.
期刊最新文献
The response of the secretary of state and the “supervised discharge” provision of the UK mental health bill 2022: Potential problems and opportunities in the wake of Secretary of State for Justice v MM [2018] UKSC 60 Capacity and incapacity: An appropriate border for non-consensual interventions? Child maltreatment and suicidal ideation among justice–and welfare–involved adolescents in Nigeria: Investigating the mediating role of social support and emotion regulation Editorial Board Recent research involving consent, alcohol intoxication, and memory: Implications for expert testimony in sexual assault cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1