心脏手术后的成瘾管理对注射毒品和感染性心内膜炎患者的影响

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CJC Open Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cjco.2023.12.007
Alison Greene MD, MSC , Navjot Sandila MSc , Anthony Pryor BSc , Gregory Hirsch MD, MSc
{"title":"心脏手术后的成瘾管理对注射毒品和感染性心内膜炎患者的影响","authors":"Alison Greene MD, MSC ,&nbsp;Navjot Sandila MSc ,&nbsp;Anthony Pryor BSc ,&nbsp;Gregory Hirsch MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.cjco.2023.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Managing reinfection in patients who inject drugs and have undergone cardiac surgery could reduce mortality. A significant gap exists in the management of addiction in this population and it is rarely addressed during index hospitalization for surgical intervention. This study sought to determine if management of addiction changed rates of readmission for reinfection.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study was a retrospective chart review and analysis. Patients who underwent cardiac surgery for infective endocarditis due to injection drug use underwent a full chart review to determine if they received management of their addiction (addictions medicine consultation, social work consultation, medication- and/or opioid-assisted treatment, and community follow-up) following their surgical intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 41 patients were identified who met the inclusion criteria. For addictions management, 43.2% of patients received an addictions medicine consultation, 67.6% received a social work consultation, 40.5% received medication- and/or opioid-assisted treatment, and 56.8% received community follow-up. Overall mortality of these patients was 21.6%, and 56.8% of patients were readmitted with reinfection. Multivariate logistic regression showed that patients who received intervention were 1.6 times more likely to be readmitted with reinfection (odds ratio 1.65, 95% confidence interval 0.29-9.41, <em>P</em> = 0.5736). Female patients had a significantly higher odds of reinfection, when adjusted for gender (odds ratio 9.95, 95% confidence interval 1.42-69.72, <em>P</em> = 0.021).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We demonstrated a nonstandardized approach to consultation and varying approaches to management of addiction. Patients who received intervention for addiction were more likely to be readmitted for reinfection, but this difference was not significant. Future efforts can include promotion of formalized addictions consultation services for high-risk patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36924,"journal":{"name":"CJC Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589790X2300375X/pdfft?md5=4b9237ef90c52a303223928e27655401&pid=1-s2.0-S2589790X2300375X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Addictions Management Following Cardiac Surgery on People Who Inject Drugs and Have Infective Endocarditis\",\"authors\":\"Alison Greene MD, MSC ,&nbsp;Navjot Sandila MSc ,&nbsp;Anthony Pryor BSc ,&nbsp;Gregory Hirsch MD, MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cjco.2023.12.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Managing reinfection in patients who inject drugs and have undergone cardiac surgery could reduce mortality. A significant gap exists in the management of addiction in this population and it is rarely addressed during index hospitalization for surgical intervention. This study sought to determine if management of addiction changed rates of readmission for reinfection.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study was a retrospective chart review and analysis. Patients who underwent cardiac surgery for infective endocarditis due to injection drug use underwent a full chart review to determine if they received management of their addiction (addictions medicine consultation, social work consultation, medication- and/or opioid-assisted treatment, and community follow-up) following their surgical intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 41 patients were identified who met the inclusion criteria. For addictions management, 43.2% of patients received an addictions medicine consultation, 67.6% received a social work consultation, 40.5% received medication- and/or opioid-assisted treatment, and 56.8% received community follow-up. Overall mortality of these patients was 21.6%, and 56.8% of patients were readmitted with reinfection. Multivariate logistic regression showed that patients who received intervention were 1.6 times more likely to be readmitted with reinfection (odds ratio 1.65, 95% confidence interval 0.29-9.41, <em>P</em> = 0.5736). Female patients had a significantly higher odds of reinfection, when adjusted for gender (odds ratio 9.95, 95% confidence interval 1.42-69.72, <em>P</em> = 0.021).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We demonstrated a nonstandardized approach to consultation and varying approaches to management of addiction. Patients who received intervention for addiction were more likely to be readmitted for reinfection, but this difference was not significant. Future efforts can include promotion of formalized addictions consultation services for high-risk patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CJC Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589790X2300375X/pdfft?md5=4b9237ef90c52a303223928e27655401&pid=1-s2.0-S2589790X2300375X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CJC Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589790X2300375X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJC Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589790X2300375X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景对注射毒品并接受心脏手术的患者进行再感染管理可降低死亡率。对这一人群的毒瘾管理存在很大差距,而且在因手术干预而住院的索引中很少涉及这一问题。本研究旨在确定对毒瘾的管理是否会改变再感染的再入院率。因注射吸毒导致感染性心内膜炎而接受心脏手术的患者均接受了完整的病历审查,以确定他们在接受手术治疗后是否接受了成瘾管理(成瘾医学咨询、社会工作咨询、药物和/或阿片类药物辅助治疗以及社区随访)。在成瘾管理方面,43.2%的患者接受了成瘾医学咨询,67.6%的患者接受了社会工作咨询,40.5%的患者接受了药物和/或阿片类药物辅助治疗,56.8%的患者接受了社区随访。这些患者的总死亡率为 21.6%,56.8% 的患者因再次感染而再次入院。多变量逻辑回归显示,接受干预的患者再次感染入院的几率是接受干预的患者的 1.6 倍(几率比 1.65,95% 置信区间 0.29-9.41,P = 0.5736)。经性别调整后,女性患者再次感染的几率明显更高(几率比 9.95,95% 置信区间 1.42-69.72,P = 0.021)。接受成瘾干预的患者更有可能因再次感染而再次入院,但这种差异并不显著。今后的工作可包括推广针对高危患者的正规成瘾咨询服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of Addictions Management Following Cardiac Surgery on People Who Inject Drugs and Have Infective Endocarditis

Background

Managing reinfection in patients who inject drugs and have undergone cardiac surgery could reduce mortality. A significant gap exists in the management of addiction in this population and it is rarely addressed during index hospitalization for surgical intervention. This study sought to determine if management of addiction changed rates of readmission for reinfection.

Methods

This study was a retrospective chart review and analysis. Patients who underwent cardiac surgery for infective endocarditis due to injection drug use underwent a full chart review to determine if they received management of their addiction (addictions medicine consultation, social work consultation, medication- and/or opioid-assisted treatment, and community follow-up) following their surgical intervention.

Results

A total of 41 patients were identified who met the inclusion criteria. For addictions management, 43.2% of patients received an addictions medicine consultation, 67.6% received a social work consultation, 40.5% received medication- and/or opioid-assisted treatment, and 56.8% received community follow-up. Overall mortality of these patients was 21.6%, and 56.8% of patients were readmitted with reinfection. Multivariate logistic regression showed that patients who received intervention were 1.6 times more likely to be readmitted with reinfection (odds ratio 1.65, 95% confidence interval 0.29-9.41, P = 0.5736). Female patients had a significantly higher odds of reinfection, when adjusted for gender (odds ratio 9.95, 95% confidence interval 1.42-69.72, P = 0.021).

Conclusions

We demonstrated a nonstandardized approach to consultation and varying approaches to management of addiction. Patients who received intervention for addiction were more likely to be readmitted for reinfection, but this difference was not significant. Future efforts can include promotion of formalized addictions consultation services for high-risk patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CJC Open
CJC Open Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
60 days
期刊最新文献
Cardiac Papillary Fibroelastoma and Cerebrovascular Events: A Systematic Review Late-Onset Mitral Valve Prosthesis Dehiscence With Severe Paravalvular Leak—Infectious Versus Noninfectious Etiology Dilemma: A Case Report Assessing the Safety of Early Repatriation for Stable ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Coronary Sinus Reducer Improves Myocardial Perfusion in a Patient With Angina, Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, and Coronary Microvascular Disease Fractured and Entrapped Coronary Angioplasty Balloon Successfully Managed with Rotational Atherectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1