在模拟医疗环境中被认为最能引起共鸣的非语言行为

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in Human Behavior Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108268
Audrey Marcoux , Marie-Hélène Tessier , Philip L. Jackson
{"title":"在模拟医疗环境中被认为最能引起共鸣的非语言行为","authors":"Audrey Marcoux ,&nbsp;Marie-Hélène Tessier ,&nbsp;Philip L. Jackson","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Perceiving empathy from healthcare professionals contributes to clinical benefits. Yet, for methodological and ethical reasons, the factors affecting perceived empathy, such as how the nonverbal behaviors of professionals interact, are less understood than those influencing the actual act of empathizing. Two online studies examined how the perception of empathy in a medical context of pain was influenced by factors related to digital healthcare professionals (DHPs) and participants acting as suffering patients. In Study 1 (<em>n</em> = 123), participants watched videos of DHPs showing variations in gaze direction, posture, and facial expression to rate perceived empathy from a visual patient perspective. They perceived more empathy from the face expressing pain, regardless of gaze, posture, and gender of the DHPs. The sex of participants also modulated perceived empathy. Study 2 (<em>n</em> = 116) expanded Study 1 by adding faces expressing pain and sadness of varying intensities, along with perspective-taking instructions, to determine whether higher perceived empathy for the face expressing pain stems from its congruence with the medical pain context. Participants perceived more empathy in faces expressing sadness than pain. Sadness and pain interacted differently with the effects of intensity, posture, and gaze direction. This work challenges the idea that exact congruence with the patient's affective state is necessary and further contributes to investigating nonverbal behaviors of empathy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224001365/pdfft?md5=ae3d18d3395f7de38f962749e2e76dbd&pid=1-s2.0-S0747563224001365-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonverbal behaviors perceived as most empathic in a simulated medical context\",\"authors\":\"Audrey Marcoux ,&nbsp;Marie-Hélène Tessier ,&nbsp;Philip L. Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Perceiving empathy from healthcare professionals contributes to clinical benefits. Yet, for methodological and ethical reasons, the factors affecting perceived empathy, such as how the nonverbal behaviors of professionals interact, are less understood than those influencing the actual act of empathizing. Two online studies examined how the perception of empathy in a medical context of pain was influenced by factors related to digital healthcare professionals (DHPs) and participants acting as suffering patients. In Study 1 (<em>n</em> = 123), participants watched videos of DHPs showing variations in gaze direction, posture, and facial expression to rate perceived empathy from a visual patient perspective. They perceived more empathy from the face expressing pain, regardless of gaze, posture, and gender of the DHPs. The sex of participants also modulated perceived empathy. Study 2 (<em>n</em> = 116) expanded Study 1 by adding faces expressing pain and sadness of varying intensities, along with perspective-taking instructions, to determine whether higher perceived empathy for the face expressing pain stems from its congruence with the medical pain context. Participants perceived more empathy in faces expressing sadness than pain. Sadness and pain interacted differently with the effects of intensity, posture, and gaze direction. This work challenges the idea that exact congruence with the patient's affective state is necessary and further contributes to investigating nonverbal behaviors of empathy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224001365/pdfft?md5=ae3d18d3395f7de38f962749e2e76dbd&pid=1-s2.0-S0747563224001365-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224001365\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224001365","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从医护人员那里感知共情有助于临床获益。然而,由于方法学和伦理方面的原因,人们对影响感知同理心的因素(如专业人员的非语言行为如何相互作用)的了解要少于对影响实际同理心行为的因素的了解。两项在线研究考察了在疼痛的医疗环境中,共情感知如何受到与数字医疗专业人员(DHPs)和扮演痛苦患者的参与者有关的因素的影响。在研究 1(n = 123)中,参与者观看了 DHPs 在注视方向、姿势和面部表情上的变化视频,从视觉患者的角度对感知到的同理心进行评分。无论 DHPs 的注视方向、姿势和性别如何,他们都能从表达痛苦的面部表情中感知到更多的共情。参与者的性别也会调节感知到的共情。研究 2(n = 116)扩展了研究 1,增加了不同强度的表达痛苦和悲伤的人脸,同时还增加了视角转换指令,以确定表达痛苦的人脸是否因为与医疗疼痛情境一致而产生更多共鸣。参与者对悲伤面孔的共情感知高于对疼痛面孔的共情感知。悲伤和痛苦与强度、姿势和注视方向的影响有不同的交互作用。这项研究对必须与病人的情感状态完全一致这一观点提出了质疑,并进一步促进了对非语言移情行为的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nonverbal behaviors perceived as most empathic in a simulated medical context

Perceiving empathy from healthcare professionals contributes to clinical benefits. Yet, for methodological and ethical reasons, the factors affecting perceived empathy, such as how the nonverbal behaviors of professionals interact, are less understood than those influencing the actual act of empathizing. Two online studies examined how the perception of empathy in a medical context of pain was influenced by factors related to digital healthcare professionals (DHPs) and participants acting as suffering patients. In Study 1 (n = 123), participants watched videos of DHPs showing variations in gaze direction, posture, and facial expression to rate perceived empathy from a visual patient perspective. They perceived more empathy from the face expressing pain, regardless of gaze, posture, and gender of the DHPs. The sex of participants also modulated perceived empathy. Study 2 (n = 116) expanded Study 1 by adding faces expressing pain and sadness of varying intensities, along with perspective-taking instructions, to determine whether higher perceived empathy for the face expressing pain stems from its congruence with the medical pain context. Participants perceived more empathy in faces expressing sadness than pain. Sadness and pain interacted differently with the effects of intensity, posture, and gaze direction. This work challenges the idea that exact congruence with the patient's affective state is necessary and further contributes to investigating nonverbal behaviors of empathy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
期刊最新文献
The negative consequences of networking through social network services: A social comparison perspective Can online behaviors be linked to mental health? Active versus passive social network usage on depression via envy and self-esteem Self-regulation deficiencies and perceived problematic online pornography use among young Chinese women: The role of self-acceptance Flow in ChatGPT-based logic learning and its influences on logic and self-efficacy in English argumentative writing Navigating online perils: Socioeconomic status, online activity lifestyles, and online fraud targeting and victimization of old adults in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1