交通不平等的原因:美国共享单车案例

IF 3.3 Q3 TRANSPORTATION Case Studies on Transport Policy Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101199
Jingyun Chen, Ling Huang
{"title":"交通不平等的原因:美国共享单车案例","authors":"Jingyun Chen,&nbsp;Ling Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The bike-sharing system, as an innovation to solve the first-and-last-mile transportation problem, tends to be disproportionally used much less by lower income users. In this paper, we focus on testing two causes of this inequality: availability of stations and affordability, using a difference-in-difference framework with various treatments. We discovered that stations are more readily available in higher-income areas. However, increasing station availability will not reduce the usage inequality. Instead, we find that equity programs that increase the affordability of low-income users can reduce the usage gap between high and low-income groups. The major findings of this paper suggest that to create a more inclusive and equal urban transportation ecosystem, urban planners, policymakers, and bike-sharing operators need to allocate more resources to support affordability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 101199"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causes of transportation inequality: The case of bike sharing in the U.S.\",\"authors\":\"Jingyun Chen,&nbsp;Ling Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The bike-sharing system, as an innovation to solve the first-and-last-mile transportation problem, tends to be disproportionally used much less by lower income users. In this paper, we focus on testing two causes of this inequality: availability of stations and affordability, using a difference-in-difference framework with various treatments. We discovered that stations are more readily available in higher-income areas. However, increasing station availability will not reduce the usage inequality. Instead, we find that equity programs that increase the affordability of low-income users can reduce the usage gap between high and low-income groups. The major findings of this paper suggest that to create a more inclusive and equal urban transportation ecosystem, urban planners, policymakers, and bike-sharing operators need to allocate more resources to support affordability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X24000543\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X24000543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

共享单车系统作为解决 "最初和最后一英里 "交通问题的一项创新,其低收入用户的使用率往往低得不成比例。在本文中,我们利用不同处理方法的差分框架,重点检验了造成这种不平等现象的两个原因:站点的可用性和可负担性。我们发现,在高收入地区更容易获得车站。然而,增加车站的可用性并不会减少使用率的不平等。相反,我们发现,提高低收入用户负担能力的公平计划可以缩小高收入群体和低收入群体之间的使用差距。本文的主要研究结果表明,要创建一个更具包容性和平等性的城市交通生态系统,城市规划者、政策制定者和共享单车运营商需要分配更多资源来支持可负担性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Causes of transportation inequality: The case of bike sharing in the U.S.

The bike-sharing system, as an innovation to solve the first-and-last-mile transportation problem, tends to be disproportionally used much less by lower income users. In this paper, we focus on testing two causes of this inequality: availability of stations and affordability, using a difference-in-difference framework with various treatments. We discovered that stations are more readily available in higher-income areas. However, increasing station availability will not reduce the usage inequality. Instead, we find that equity programs that increase the affordability of low-income users can reduce the usage gap between high and low-income groups. The major findings of this paper suggest that to create a more inclusive and equal urban transportation ecosystem, urban planners, policymakers, and bike-sharing operators need to allocate more resources to support affordability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
222
期刊最新文献
From gasoline to green: understanding the acceptance of electric motorcycles from the motorcyclists’ perspective – evidence from Tehran Connecting or dividing London? Evaluating the impact of the Elizabeth Line on job accessibility and spatial equity Simulation-based decision-making framework for sustainable intermodal transport including next-generation freight electric multiple-units Integrating non-motorized transportation with light rail transit: travel demand models for Rayong, Thailand Temporal heterogeneity in sociotechnical urban mobility systems: Evidence from distributed lag models in Curitiba, Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1