中国制造 2025》对中国有用吗?来自中国上市公司的证据

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Research Policy Pub Date : 2024-04-27 DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2024.105009
Guangwei Li , Lee G. Branstetter
{"title":"中国制造 2025》对中国有用吗?来自中国上市公司的证据","authors":"Guangwei Li ,&nbsp;Lee G. Branstetter","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Economic theories have shown that industrial policy's effectiveness in fostering innovation hinges on its ability to address market failures, stimulate creative destruction, and avert adverse foreign reactions. Conversely, distortions induced by the policy and foreign countermeasures can impede its success. In this paper, we use information extracted from Chinese listed firms' financial reports and a difference-in-differences approach to examine how the “Made in China 2025” policy initiative has impacted firms' innovation and productivity outcomes. Our findings reveal that while targeted firms by the policy seem to receive increased innovation subsidies and display some indications of a heightened R&amp;D/sales ratio, statistically significant improvements in patenting and productivity are lacking. These results cast doubt on the efficacy of the “Made in China 2025” initiative in achieving its intended goal of promoting the innovation capability of targeted firms, highlighting the theoretical and practical complexities of innovation-focused industrial policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does “Made in China 2025” work for China? Evidence from Chinese listed firms\",\"authors\":\"Guangwei Li ,&nbsp;Lee G. Branstetter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Economic theories have shown that industrial policy's effectiveness in fostering innovation hinges on its ability to address market failures, stimulate creative destruction, and avert adverse foreign reactions. Conversely, distortions induced by the policy and foreign countermeasures can impede its success. In this paper, we use information extracted from Chinese listed firms' financial reports and a difference-in-differences approach to examine how the “Made in China 2025” policy initiative has impacted firms' innovation and productivity outcomes. Our findings reveal that while targeted firms by the policy seem to receive increased innovation subsidies and display some indications of a heightened R&amp;D/sales ratio, statistically significant improvements in patenting and productivity are lacking. These results cast doubt on the efficacy of the “Made in China 2025” initiative in achieving its intended goal of promoting the innovation capability of targeted firms, highlighting the theoretical and practical complexities of innovation-focused industrial policies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324000581\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324000581","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经济理论表明,产业政策在促进创新方面的有效性取决于其解决市场失灵、刺激创造性破坏和避免外国不利反应的能力。反之,政策的扭曲和外国的反制措施也会阻碍政策的成功。在本文中,我们利用从中国上市公司财务报告中提取的信息,采用差分法研究了 "中国制造 2025 "政策倡议如何影响了企业的创新和生产力成果。我们的研究结果表明,虽然该政策的目标企业似乎获得了更多的创新补贴,并显示出研发/销售比率提高的一些迹象,但在专利申请和生产率方面却缺乏统计意义上的显著改善。这些结果令人怀疑 "中国制造 2025 "能否实现其促进目标企业创新能力的预期目标,凸显了以创新为重点的产业政策在理论和实践上的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does “Made in China 2025” work for China? Evidence from Chinese listed firms

Economic theories have shown that industrial policy's effectiveness in fostering innovation hinges on its ability to address market failures, stimulate creative destruction, and avert adverse foreign reactions. Conversely, distortions induced by the policy and foreign countermeasures can impede its success. In this paper, we use information extracted from Chinese listed firms' financial reports and a difference-in-differences approach to examine how the “Made in China 2025” policy initiative has impacted firms' innovation and productivity outcomes. Our findings reveal that while targeted firms by the policy seem to receive increased innovation subsidies and display some indications of a heightened R&D/sales ratio, statistically significant improvements in patenting and productivity are lacking. These results cast doubt on the efficacy of the “Made in China 2025” initiative in achieving its intended goal of promoting the innovation capability of targeted firms, highlighting the theoretical and practical complexities of innovation-focused industrial policies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research Policy
Research Policy MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Research Policy (RP) articles explore the interaction between innovation, technology, or research, and economic, social, political, and organizational processes, both empirically and theoretically. All RP papers are expected to provide insights with implications for policy or management. Research Policy (RP) is a multidisciplinary journal focused on analyzing, understanding, and effectively addressing the challenges posed by innovation, technology, R&D, and science. This includes activities related to knowledge creation, diffusion, acquisition, and exploitation in the form of new or improved products, processes, or services, across economic, policy, management, organizational, and environmental dimensions.
期刊最新文献
Transformation of the governance of failure for radical innovation: The role of strategic leaders How media portrayal of CEO overconfidence impacts radical innovation The determinants of parallel invention: Measuring the role of information sharing and personal interaction between inventors Do the elite university projects promote scientific research competitiveness: Evidence from NSFC grants The bidirectional causality of tie stability and innovation performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1