{"title":"破产司法改革与企业贸易信贷融资","authors":"Yixin Chen , Tingting Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, we rely on an exogenous shock to examine the impact of bankruptcy judicial reform on firms' trade credit financing. We employ a staggered difference-in-differences design based on the introduction of bankruptcy courts in China and find that the implementation of bankruptcy judicial reform significantly reduces firms' trade credit financing. Mechanism tests reveal that improved judicial efficiency increases the risk perception of local firms, which discourages trade credit financing. Heterogeneity tests show that the above effect is more pronounced in firms with higher bankruptcy risks, firms with state ownership, and in regions where bankruptcy administrators have been established. Conversely, higher supplier concentration attenuates the inhibitory effect of bankruptcy judicial reform. Further analyses show that the reform mainly reduces firms' trade credit provided by customers and the trade credit with financial attributes. In addition, the reform lowers the sales of firms' suppliers but does not affect their earnings performance, while customers benefit from the reform as their earnings increase while sales do not change significantly. The findings of this paper shed light on the impact of bankruptcy judicial efficiency on corporate financing structure, and provide policy implications for promoting the construction of China's bankruptcy rule of law and preventing financial risks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48285,"journal":{"name":"中国经济评论","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bankruptcy judicial reform and corporate trade credit financing\",\"authors\":\"Yixin Chen , Tingting Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this paper, we rely on an exogenous shock to examine the impact of bankruptcy judicial reform on firms' trade credit financing. We employ a staggered difference-in-differences design based on the introduction of bankruptcy courts in China and find that the implementation of bankruptcy judicial reform significantly reduces firms' trade credit financing. Mechanism tests reveal that improved judicial efficiency increases the risk perception of local firms, which discourages trade credit financing. Heterogeneity tests show that the above effect is more pronounced in firms with higher bankruptcy risks, firms with state ownership, and in regions where bankruptcy administrators have been established. Conversely, higher supplier concentration attenuates the inhibitory effect of bankruptcy judicial reform. Further analyses show that the reform mainly reduces firms' trade credit provided by customers and the trade credit with financial attributes. In addition, the reform lowers the sales of firms' suppliers but does not affect their earnings performance, while customers benefit from the reform as their earnings increase while sales do not change significantly. The findings of this paper shed light on the impact of bankruptcy judicial efficiency on corporate financing structure, and provide policy implications for promoting the construction of China's bankruptcy rule of law and preventing financial risks.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国经济评论\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国经济评论\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X24000658\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国经济评论","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X24000658","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bankruptcy judicial reform and corporate trade credit financing
In this paper, we rely on an exogenous shock to examine the impact of bankruptcy judicial reform on firms' trade credit financing. We employ a staggered difference-in-differences design based on the introduction of bankruptcy courts in China and find that the implementation of bankruptcy judicial reform significantly reduces firms' trade credit financing. Mechanism tests reveal that improved judicial efficiency increases the risk perception of local firms, which discourages trade credit financing. Heterogeneity tests show that the above effect is more pronounced in firms with higher bankruptcy risks, firms with state ownership, and in regions where bankruptcy administrators have been established. Conversely, higher supplier concentration attenuates the inhibitory effect of bankruptcy judicial reform. Further analyses show that the reform mainly reduces firms' trade credit provided by customers and the trade credit with financial attributes. In addition, the reform lowers the sales of firms' suppliers but does not affect their earnings performance, while customers benefit from the reform as their earnings increase while sales do not change significantly. The findings of this paper shed light on the impact of bankruptcy judicial efficiency on corporate financing structure, and provide policy implications for promoting the construction of China's bankruptcy rule of law and preventing financial risks.
期刊介绍:
The China Economic Review publishes original works of scholarship which add to the knowledge of the economy of China and to economies as a discipline. We seek, in particular, papers dealing with policy, performance and institutional change. Empirical papers normally use a formal model, a data set, and standard statistical techniques. Submissions are subjected to double-blind peer review.