侵犯、拒绝或节制:面临暴力风险的儿童青少年时期

A. Chandon-Piazza
{"title":"侵犯、拒绝或节制:面临暴力风险的儿童青少年时期","authors":"A. Chandon-Piazza","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2024.100436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>The work of the clinical psychologist in pediatric hospitals aims to promote the subjective appropriation of the experience by the child, by ensuring a feeling of continuity and security. It is particularly important to ensure the quality of the relation between subject, entourage, and caregivers. However, a certain amount of violence exists in the relation between caregiver and patient. We suggest that beyond the violence of caregiving itself, there is an “over-violence” (Tomkiewicz, 1991) which risks undermining the patient's feeling of security.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We believe that this over-violence arises when caregivers are confronted with intolerable experiences in the face of the vital risk incurred by the patient. This article aims to examine the emergence of this over-violence and its modes of expression.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>This work is based on several situations encountered in different pediatric wards, based on three cases of adolescent patients who put their caregivers in difficulty and required the intervention of hospital psychologists to understand the issues at hand.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Through these different clinical cases we identify two mechanisms of over-violence. First, encroachment, in the form of excessive control of patients’ behavior, which echoes the control that exists over the bodies of sick children. second, rejection, as an attempt to evacuate that which is violent, despite the needs of the patient, sometimes justified by the imperative of freeing hospital beds for other patients. We also identify the effects of a paradoxical over-violence in the oscillation between these two poles.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Faced with potential death and the anxiety it arouses, caregivers confronted with violent affects deploy unconscious defense mechanisms that can undermine the professional-patient relationship and can produce over-violence in care. Faced with this phenomenon, reflecting together as a team allows for the regulation of affects and promotes temperance in the professional-patient relationship. Psychologists practicing in somatic hospitals are instrumental in the setting up and maintaining of spaces for regulation or analysis of professional practice in services in which psychological care is not the primary task.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"8 1","pages":"Article 100436"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empiètement, rejet ou tempérance : l’adolescence en pédiatrie au risque de la surviolence\",\"authors\":\"A. Chandon-Piazza\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.inan.2024.100436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>The work of the clinical psychologist in pediatric hospitals aims to promote the subjective appropriation of the experience by the child, by ensuring a feeling of continuity and security. It is particularly important to ensure the quality of the relation between subject, entourage, and caregivers. However, a certain amount of violence exists in the relation between caregiver and patient. We suggest that beyond the violence of caregiving itself, there is an “over-violence” (Tomkiewicz, 1991) which risks undermining the patient's feeling of security.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We believe that this over-violence arises when caregivers are confronted with intolerable experiences in the face of the vital risk incurred by the patient. This article aims to examine the emergence of this over-violence and its modes of expression.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>This work is based on several situations encountered in different pediatric wards, based on three cases of adolescent patients who put their caregivers in difficulty and required the intervention of hospital psychologists to understand the issues at hand.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Through these different clinical cases we identify two mechanisms of over-violence. First, encroachment, in the form of excessive control of patients’ behavior, which echoes the control that exists over the bodies of sick children. second, rejection, as an attempt to evacuate that which is violent, despite the needs of the patient, sometimes justified by the imperative of freeing hospital beds for other patients. We also identify the effects of a paradoxical over-violence in the oscillation between these two poles.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Faced with potential death and the anxiety it arouses, caregivers confronted with violent affects deploy unconscious defense mechanisms that can undermine the professional-patient relationship and can produce over-violence in care. Faced with this phenomenon, reflecting together as a team allows for the regulation of affects and promotes temperance in the professional-patient relationship. Psychologists practicing in somatic hospitals are instrumental in the setting up and maintaining of spaces for regulation or analysis of professional practice in services in which psychological care is not the primary task.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"In Analysis\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100436\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"In Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542360624000131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542360624000131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景儿科医院临床心理学家的工作旨在通过确保连续性和安全感,促进儿童对体验的主观占有。确保主体、随行人员和护理人员之间关系的质量尤为重要。然而,在护理人员和病人之间的关系中存在着一定程度的暴力。我们认为,除了护理本身的暴力之外,还有一种 "过度暴力"(Tomkiewicz,1991 年),有可能破坏病人的安全感。本文旨在研究这种过度暴力的出现及其表达方式。方法这项工作基于在不同儿科病房中遇到的几种情况,以三例青少年患者为基础,这些患者使其看护者陷入困境,需要医院心理学家的干预才能了解当前的问题。第一,侵占,即对病人行为的过度控制,这与对患病儿童身体的控制相呼应。第二,拒绝,即不顾病人的需要,试图将暴力者撤离,有时以腾出病床给其他病人为由。讨论面对潜在的死亡及其引发的焦虑,护理人员在面对暴力情绪时会采取无意识的防御机制,这可能会破坏专业人员与患者之间的关系,并可能在护理过程中产生过度暴力。面对这种现象,作为一个团队,共同反思可以调节情绪,促进专业医患关系中的节制。在躯体医院执业的心理学家在建立和维护专业实践的调节或分析空间方面发挥了重要作用,因为在这些服务中,心理治疗并不是主要任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Empiètement, rejet ou tempérance : l’adolescence en pédiatrie au risque de la surviolence

Context

The work of the clinical psychologist in pediatric hospitals aims to promote the subjective appropriation of the experience by the child, by ensuring a feeling of continuity and security. It is particularly important to ensure the quality of the relation between subject, entourage, and caregivers. However, a certain amount of violence exists in the relation between caregiver and patient. We suggest that beyond the violence of caregiving itself, there is an “over-violence” (Tomkiewicz, 1991) which risks undermining the patient's feeling of security.

Objectives

We believe that this over-violence arises when caregivers are confronted with intolerable experiences in the face of the vital risk incurred by the patient. This article aims to examine the emergence of this over-violence and its modes of expression.

Method

This work is based on several situations encountered in different pediatric wards, based on three cases of adolescent patients who put their caregivers in difficulty and required the intervention of hospital psychologists to understand the issues at hand.

Results

Through these different clinical cases we identify two mechanisms of over-violence. First, encroachment, in the form of excessive control of patients’ behavior, which echoes the control that exists over the bodies of sick children. second, rejection, as an attempt to evacuate that which is violent, despite the needs of the patient, sometimes justified by the imperative of freeing hospital beds for other patients. We also identify the effects of a paradoxical over-violence in the oscillation between these two poles.

Discussion

Faced with potential death and the anxiety it arouses, caregivers confronted with violent affects deploy unconscious defense mechanisms that can undermine the professional-patient relationship and can produce over-violence in care. Faced with this phenomenon, reflecting together as a team allows for the regulation of affects and promotes temperance in the professional-patient relationship. Psychologists practicing in somatic hospitals are instrumental in the setting up and maintaining of spaces for regulation or analysis of professional practice in services in which psychological care is not the primary task.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cybercapitalisme et inconscient économique : la manipulation invisible des désirs et des comportements Économie psychique et écoanxiété. Ce que la théorie freudienne apporte à l’écologie politique “There is a crack in everything, That's how the light gets in”. Maintaining hygiene and striving for purity: An interdisciplinary study D’autres vibrations : recension de l’ouvrage La vallée du silicium, d’Alain Damasio, (Seuil, 2024) Impossible régulation de l’inconscient ? À propos de l’article « Inconscient économique et influences non conscientes de la publicité » de D. Courbet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1