概念验证研究展示如何协调 FITBIR 数据集,以检查创伤后应激障碍与创伤性脑损伤之间的关系

Maya E O'Neil, David C Cameron, Kate Clauss, Danielle Krushnic, William Baker-Robinson, Sara Hannon, Tamara Cheney, Josh Kaplan, Lawrence Cook, Meike Niederhausen, Miranda Pappas, David Cifu
{"title":"概念验证研究展示如何协调 FITBIR 数据集,以检查创伤后应激障碍与创伤性脑损伤之间的关系","authors":"Maya E O'Neil, David C Cameron, Kate Clauss, Danielle Krushnic, William Baker-Robinson, Sara Hannon, Tamara Cheney, Josh Kaplan, Lawrence Cook, Meike Niederhausen, Miranda Pappas, David Cifu","doi":"10.35566/jbds/oneil","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Although posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is common following traumatic brain injury (TBI), the specific associations between these conditions is difficult to elucidate in part due to the diverse methodologies, small samples, and limited longitudinal data in the extant literature. \nObjective: Conduct a proof-of-concept study demonstrating our ability to compile patient-level TBI data from shared studies in the Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury Research (FITBIR) Informatics System to address these shortcomings and improve our understanding of TBI outcomes including the rates PTSD comorbidity. \nMethod: We searched the FITBIR database for shared studies reporting rates of probable PTSD among participants with no TBI, history of mild TBI, or history of moderate/severe TBI. We merged and harmonized data across the relevant studies and analyzed rates of probable PTSD across TBI history and severity categories. \nResults: Four FITBIR studies with 2,312 participants included PTSD outcome data. The final sample for comparative analyses comprised 1,633 participants from two studies with TBI group comparison data. Approximately 79% had a history of mild TBI and 32-37% screened positive for probable PTSD. Participants with a history of mild TBI had 2.8 greater odds of probable PTSD compared to those without TBI (95% CI: 2.0, 3.7). \nConclusions: Only two FITBIR studies reported data examining PTSD outcomes for mild TBI as of January 2021. The analyses are consistent with prior literature, suggesting mild TBI is associated with higher rates of probable PTSD than no TBI. This study developed the methods, shared the harmonization and analysis code, and publicly shared the TBI and PTSD meta-dataset back to FITBIR for dissemination through their website, allowing future research teams to update these and other, related analyses as more studies are contributed to and shared via the FITBIR platform.","PeriodicalId":93575,"journal":{"name":"Journal of behavioral data science","volume":"3 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Proof-of-Concept Study Demonstrating How FITBIR Datasets Can be Harmonized to Examine Posttraumatic Stress Disorder-Traumatic Brain Injury Associations\",\"authors\":\"Maya E O'Neil, David C Cameron, Kate Clauss, Danielle Krushnic, William Baker-Robinson, Sara Hannon, Tamara Cheney, Josh Kaplan, Lawrence Cook, Meike Niederhausen, Miranda Pappas, David Cifu\",\"doi\":\"10.35566/jbds/oneil\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Although posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is common following traumatic brain injury (TBI), the specific associations between these conditions is difficult to elucidate in part due to the diverse methodologies, small samples, and limited longitudinal data in the extant literature. \\nObjective: Conduct a proof-of-concept study demonstrating our ability to compile patient-level TBI data from shared studies in the Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury Research (FITBIR) Informatics System to address these shortcomings and improve our understanding of TBI outcomes including the rates PTSD comorbidity. \\nMethod: We searched the FITBIR database for shared studies reporting rates of probable PTSD among participants with no TBI, history of mild TBI, or history of moderate/severe TBI. We merged and harmonized data across the relevant studies and analyzed rates of probable PTSD across TBI history and severity categories. \\nResults: Four FITBIR studies with 2,312 participants included PTSD outcome data. The final sample for comparative analyses comprised 1,633 participants from two studies with TBI group comparison data. Approximately 79% had a history of mild TBI and 32-37% screened positive for probable PTSD. Participants with a history of mild TBI had 2.8 greater odds of probable PTSD compared to those without TBI (95% CI: 2.0, 3.7). \\nConclusions: Only two FITBIR studies reported data examining PTSD outcomes for mild TBI as of January 2021. The analyses are consistent with prior literature, suggesting mild TBI is associated with higher rates of probable PTSD than no TBI. This study developed the methods, shared the harmonization and analysis code, and publicly shared the TBI and PTSD meta-dataset back to FITBIR for dissemination through their website, allowing future research teams to update these and other, related analyses as more studies are contributed to and shared via the FITBIR platform.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of behavioral data science\",\"volume\":\"3 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of behavioral data science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35566/jbds/oneil\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of behavioral data science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35566/jbds/oneil","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后很常见,但这些病症之间的具体关联却很难阐明,部分原因是现有文献中的方法多样、样本较少且纵向数据有限。目标:开展一项概念验证研究,证明我们有能力从联邦机构间创伤性脑损伤研究(FITBIR)信息系统中的共享研究中汇编患者级别的创伤性脑损伤数据,以解决这些不足之处,并提高我们对创伤性脑损伤结果(包括创伤后应激障碍合并症发生率)的认识。方法:我们在 FITBIR 数据库中搜索了报告无创伤性脑损伤、轻度创伤性脑损伤或中度/重度创伤性脑损伤参与者中创伤后应激障碍可能发生率的共享研究。我们合并并统一了相关研究的数据,分析了不同创伤后应激障碍病史和严重程度类别的可能创伤后应激障碍发生率。研究结果四项 FITBIR 研究共纳入了 2312 名参与者的创伤后应激障碍结果数据。用于对比分析的最终样本包括来自两项研究的 1,633 名参与者,其中包含 TBI 组对比数据。约 79% 的人有轻度创伤后应激障碍病史,32%-37% 的人可能患有创伤后应激障碍。有轻度创伤性脑损伤病史的参与者与没有创伤性脑损伤病史的参与者相比,可能患有创伤后应激障碍的几率要高出 2.8(95% CI:2.0,3.7)。结论:截至 2021 年 1 月,只有两项 FITBIR 研究报告了轻度 TBI 的创伤后应激障碍结果数据。分析结果与之前的文献一致,表明轻度创伤性脑损伤与可能的创伤后应激障碍发生率高于无创伤性脑损伤。本研究开发了相关方法,共享了协调和分析代码,并将 TBI 和创伤后应激障碍元数据集公开共享给 FITBIR,以便通过其网站进行传播,从而使未来的研究团队能够随着更多研究的贡献和通过 FITBIR 平台的共享而更新这些及其他相关分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Proof-of-Concept Study Demonstrating How FITBIR Datasets Can be Harmonized to Examine Posttraumatic Stress Disorder-Traumatic Brain Injury Associations
Background: Although posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is common following traumatic brain injury (TBI), the specific associations between these conditions is difficult to elucidate in part due to the diverse methodologies, small samples, and limited longitudinal data in the extant literature. Objective: Conduct a proof-of-concept study demonstrating our ability to compile patient-level TBI data from shared studies in the Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury Research (FITBIR) Informatics System to address these shortcomings and improve our understanding of TBI outcomes including the rates PTSD comorbidity. Method: We searched the FITBIR database for shared studies reporting rates of probable PTSD among participants with no TBI, history of mild TBI, or history of moderate/severe TBI. We merged and harmonized data across the relevant studies and analyzed rates of probable PTSD across TBI history and severity categories. Results: Four FITBIR studies with 2,312 participants included PTSD outcome data. The final sample for comparative analyses comprised 1,633 participants from two studies with TBI group comparison data. Approximately 79% had a history of mild TBI and 32-37% screened positive for probable PTSD. Participants with a history of mild TBI had 2.8 greater odds of probable PTSD compared to those without TBI (95% CI: 2.0, 3.7). Conclusions: Only two FITBIR studies reported data examining PTSD outcomes for mild TBI as of January 2021. The analyses are consistent with prior literature, suggesting mild TBI is associated with higher rates of probable PTSD than no TBI. This study developed the methods, shared the harmonization and analysis code, and publicly shared the TBI and PTSD meta-dataset back to FITBIR for dissemination through their website, allowing future research teams to update these and other, related analyses as more studies are contributed to and shared via the FITBIR platform.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rephrasing the Lengthy and Involved Proof of Kristof’s Theorem: A Tutorial with Some New Findings Stability and Spread: Transition Metrics that are Robust to Time Interval Misspecification A Novel Approach for Identifying Unobserved Heterogeneity in Longitudinal Growth Trajectories Using Natural Cubic Smoothing Splines A Proof-of-Concept Study Demonstrating How FITBIR Datasets Can be Harmonized to Examine Posttraumatic Stress Disorder-Traumatic Brain Injury Associations Loss Aversion Distribution: The Science Behind Loss Aversion Exhibited by Sellers of Perishable Good
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1