像布尔迪厄斯学者那样写作:从社会学技艺到《社会科学研究法》中的写作模式

0 ANTHROPOLOGY Sociology Lens Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI:10.1111/johs.12458
Aurélien Boucher
{"title":"像布尔迪厄斯学者那样写作:从社会学技艺到《社会科学研究法》中的写作模式","authors":"Aurélien Boucher","doi":"10.1111/johs.12458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper is a debate on why Bourdieusian scholars have never fully embraced the “Introduction/Literature review/Data &amp; methods/Results/Discussion” (ILDRD) article format which is mainstream in North American Sociological publications. This paper attempts to argue that Pierre Bourdieu, Jean-Claude Chamboredon, and Jean-Claude Passeron developed a different writing format – inspired by Gaston Bachelard's “applied rationalism” -- and which became more influential among French scholars. The Bourdieu inspired different writing patterns and reasoning, I argue, can be traced in the flagship journal Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales. This paper invites further debate on the differences in approaching article formats in the social sciences.</p>","PeriodicalId":101168,"journal":{"name":"Sociology Lens","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Writing like a Bourdieusian Scholar: From The Craft of Sociology to the Writing Patterns in Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales\",\"authors\":\"Aurélien Boucher\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/johs.12458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper is a debate on why Bourdieusian scholars have never fully embraced the “Introduction/Literature review/Data &amp; methods/Results/Discussion” (ILDRD) article format which is mainstream in North American Sociological publications. This paper attempts to argue that Pierre Bourdieu, Jean-Claude Chamboredon, and Jean-Claude Passeron developed a different writing format – inspired by Gaston Bachelard's “applied rationalism” -- and which became more influential among French scholars. The Bourdieu inspired different writing patterns and reasoning, I argue, can be traced in the flagship journal Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales. This paper invites further debate on the differences in approaching article formats in the social sciences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociology Lens\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociology Lens\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/johs.12458\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology Lens","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/johs.12458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在讨论布尔迪厄学者为何从未完全接受北美社会学出版物主流的 "引言/文献综述/数据与方法/结果/讨论"(ILDRD)文章格式。本文试图论证皮埃尔-布迪厄(Pierre Bourdieu)、让-克洛德-尚博尔东(Jean-Claude Chamboredon)和让-克洛德-帕塞隆(Jean-Claude Passeron)受加斯东-巴赫拉(Gaston Bachelard)的 "应用理性主义 "启发,发展出了一种不同的写作格式,并在法国学者中产生了更大的影响。我认为,从旗舰期刊《社会科学研究》(Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales)中可以追溯到受布迪厄启发的不同写作模式和推理方法。本文将就社会科学文章格式的差异展开进一步讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Writing like a Bourdieusian Scholar: From The Craft of Sociology to the Writing Patterns in Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales

This paper is a debate on why Bourdieusian scholars have never fully embraced the “Introduction/Literature review/Data & methods/Results/Discussion” (ILDRD) article format which is mainstream in North American Sociological publications. This paper attempts to argue that Pierre Bourdieu, Jean-Claude Chamboredon, and Jean-Claude Passeron developed a different writing format – inspired by Gaston Bachelard's “applied rationalism” -- and which became more influential among French scholars. The Bourdieu inspired different writing patterns and reasoning, I argue, can be traced in the flagship journal Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales. This paper invites further debate on the differences in approaching article formats in the social sciences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Sociological and Political Origins in IBN Khaldun's State Theory Making “Enemies”: Industry-State Subterfuge and US Fair Trade Practices Towards Non-Market Economies Since 1960 Public Discourse on the Israel-Hamas War 2023: A Comparative Analysis of Lithuania and the United Kingdom A Global Phenomenology of Whiteness: Turkey, Europe and Institutional Global Racism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1