验证和评估俄文版 SEFAS 问卷,用于评估接受手术治疗的前足疾病患者的足踝情况

Q3 Medicine Genij Ortopedii Pub Date : 2024-04-21 DOI:10.18019/1028-4427-2024-30-2-221-233
A. A. Akulaev, A. A. Ivanov, T. Ionova, T. P. Nikitina, K. A. Tishchenkov, A. A. Povaliy
{"title":"验证和评估俄文版 SEFAS 问卷,用于评估接受手术治疗的前足疾病患者的足踝情况","authors":"A. A. Akulaev, A. A. Ivanov, T. Ionova, T. P. Nikitina, K. A. Tishchenkov, A. A. Povaliy","doi":"10.18019/1028-4427-2024-30-2-221-233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) is one of the foot health assessment tools in Sweden. Validation procedures, reliability, validity, sensitivity, approval are essential for the Russian version of the questionnaire with a new language environment.The objective was to validate the Russian version of the SEFAS questionnaire and approve the tool in the Russian surgical patients with foot disorders.Material and methods The questionnaires the patients completed preoperatively included SEFAS, SF‑36, a general health survey questionnaire, and the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). Patients were requested to  complete the SEFAS questionnaire at 2 months of surgery to assess the sensitivity of the instrument. Based on the case histories clinical researcher recorded general and physical parameters of the patients to include gender, age, socio-demographic data, nature of the foot disorder, a dorsiflexion angle of  the  first metatarsophalangeal joint. To  assess the reproducibility of  the  Russian version of the questionnaire, some patients were requested to complete the SEFAS questionnaire twice preoperatively with an interval of one day.Results The questionnaire was characterized by good internal consistency and reproducibility indicating acceptable reliability of the Russian version of SEFAS. Statistically significant correlations of varying strength were seen between the SF-36 scores and nearly all the selected questions of the SEFAS Russian version. Statistically significant correlations (moderate to weak) were observed between the LEFS total score and the selected SEFAS questions. Minimal clinically significant changes in MCID scored 3 in the assessment of clinical interpretability of the Russian version of SEFAS.Discussion The study demonstrated the reliability, validity and sensitivity of the Russian version of the SEFAS questionnaire. The questionnaire appeared to be an informative and clinically interpretable instrument for assessing foot in surgical adult patients with foot disorders.Conclusion The SEFAS questionnaire can be recommended for Russian trauma and orthopaedic practice to learn the patient's opinion of the condition.","PeriodicalId":37426,"journal":{"name":"Genij Ortopedii","volume":"118 47","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation and evaluation of the Russian version of the SEFAS questionnaire for assessing foot and ankle in surgically treated patients with forefoot disorders\",\"authors\":\"A. A. Akulaev, A. A. Ivanov, T. Ionova, T. P. Nikitina, K. A. Tishchenkov, A. A. Povaliy\",\"doi\":\"10.18019/1028-4427-2024-30-2-221-233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction The Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) is one of the foot health assessment tools in Sweden. Validation procedures, reliability, validity, sensitivity, approval are essential for the Russian version of the questionnaire with a new language environment.The objective was to validate the Russian version of the SEFAS questionnaire and approve the tool in the Russian surgical patients with foot disorders.Material and methods The questionnaires the patients completed preoperatively included SEFAS, SF‑36, a general health survey questionnaire, and the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). Patients were requested to  complete the SEFAS questionnaire at 2 months of surgery to assess the sensitivity of the instrument. Based on the case histories clinical researcher recorded general and physical parameters of the patients to include gender, age, socio-demographic data, nature of the foot disorder, a dorsiflexion angle of  the  first metatarsophalangeal joint. To  assess the reproducibility of  the  Russian version of the questionnaire, some patients were requested to complete the SEFAS questionnaire twice preoperatively with an interval of one day.Results The questionnaire was characterized by good internal consistency and reproducibility indicating acceptable reliability of the Russian version of SEFAS. Statistically significant correlations of varying strength were seen between the SF-36 scores and nearly all the selected questions of the SEFAS Russian version. Statistically significant correlations (moderate to weak) were observed between the LEFS total score and the selected SEFAS questions. Minimal clinically significant changes in MCID scored 3 in the assessment of clinical interpretability of the Russian version of SEFAS.Discussion The study demonstrated the reliability, validity and sensitivity of the Russian version of the SEFAS questionnaire. The questionnaire appeared to be an informative and clinically interpretable instrument for assessing foot in surgical adult patients with foot disorders.Conclusion The SEFAS questionnaire can be recommended for Russian trauma and orthopaedic practice to learn the patient's opinion of the condition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genij Ortopedii\",\"volume\":\"118 47\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genij Ortopedii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2024-30-2-221-233\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genij Ortopedii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2024-30-2-221-233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言 自我报告足踝评分(SEFAS)是瑞典的足部健康评估工具之一。材料和方法 患者术前填写的问卷包括 SEFAS、SF-36、一般健康调查问卷和下肢功能量表(LEFS)。为了评估该工具的灵敏度,要求患者在术后两个月时填写 SEFAS 问卷。临床研究人员根据病史记录了患者的一般和身体参数,包括性别、年龄、社会人口学数据、足部疾病的性质以及第一跖趾关节的外翻角度。为了评估俄文版问卷的可重复性,一些患者被要求在术前完成两次 SEFAS 问卷,每次间隔一天。结果 问卷具有良好的内部一致性和可重复性,表明俄文版 SEFAS 的可靠性可以接受。SF-36 评分与 SEFAS 俄语版几乎所有选定问题之间都存在不同程度的统计学意义上的相关性。LEFS 总分与 SEFAS 所选问题之间存在统计学意义上的相关性(中度至弱度)。在对俄文版 SEFAS 的临床可解释性进行评估时,MCID 得分为 3 的临床显著性变化极小。讨论 该研究证明了俄文版 SEFAS 问卷的可靠性、有效性和敏感性。结论 SEFAS 问卷可推荐用于俄罗斯创伤和骨科实践,以了解患者对病情的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation and evaluation of the Russian version of the SEFAS questionnaire for assessing foot and ankle in surgically treated patients with forefoot disorders
Introduction The Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) is one of the foot health assessment tools in Sweden. Validation procedures, reliability, validity, sensitivity, approval are essential for the Russian version of the questionnaire with a new language environment.The objective was to validate the Russian version of the SEFAS questionnaire and approve the tool in the Russian surgical patients with foot disorders.Material and methods The questionnaires the patients completed preoperatively included SEFAS, SF‑36, a general health survey questionnaire, and the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). Patients were requested to  complete the SEFAS questionnaire at 2 months of surgery to assess the sensitivity of the instrument. Based on the case histories clinical researcher recorded general and physical parameters of the patients to include gender, age, socio-demographic data, nature of the foot disorder, a dorsiflexion angle of  the  first metatarsophalangeal joint. To  assess the reproducibility of  the  Russian version of the questionnaire, some patients were requested to complete the SEFAS questionnaire twice preoperatively with an interval of one day.Results The questionnaire was characterized by good internal consistency and reproducibility indicating acceptable reliability of the Russian version of SEFAS. Statistically significant correlations of varying strength were seen between the SF-36 scores and nearly all the selected questions of the SEFAS Russian version. Statistically significant correlations (moderate to weak) were observed between the LEFS total score and the selected SEFAS questions. Minimal clinically significant changes in MCID scored 3 in the assessment of clinical interpretability of the Russian version of SEFAS.Discussion The study demonstrated the reliability, validity and sensitivity of the Russian version of the SEFAS questionnaire. The questionnaire appeared to be an informative and clinically interpretable instrument for assessing foot in surgical adult patients with foot disorders.Conclusion The SEFAS questionnaire can be recommended for Russian trauma and orthopaedic practice to learn the patient's opinion of the condition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genij Ortopedii
Genij Ortopedii Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal’s main goal is to contribute to the development of the contemporary medical science via presentation of fundamental and applied original scientific studies to the scientific and practical medical community that would widen and deepen the understanding of the most important problems in the field of traumatology, orthopaedics, and related specialties. Our journal provides a direct open access to its content which is based on the principle that the open access option promotes global exchange of knowledge and experience. Journal’s strategy: -Development of the journal as a scientific platform for researchers, doctors, post-graduates and residents -Attraction of highly-cited authors to publish their studies -Selection of manuscripts of scientific interest for readers that will impact on journal citation index in RINC -Increase in the portion of publications submitted by foreign authors and studies conducted in association with foreign scientists; growth of citations in the journals that are included into global systems of indexing and reputable databases -Improvement of the Journal’s web site in two languages for a greater accessibility by authors and readers -Introduction of the Journal into global indexing systems
期刊最新文献
Evolution of the first metatarsophalangeal joint replacement Orthopaedic complications of hemiparetic forms of cerebral palsy: problems of the lower extremities (literature review) Evolution of tactical approaches to eliminating limb length discrepancy Current state of the treatment problem in the patients with elbow joint contractures due to ossification Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae in children and adolescents (literature review, illustrated with clinical observations)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1