腹膜透析中的重复腹膜炎:一项队列研究

Nabil Hmaidouch, Sara El Maakoul, Hajar Fitah, N. Ouzeddoun, Loubna Benamar
{"title":"腹膜透析中的重复腹膜炎:一项队列研究","authors":"Nabil Hmaidouch, Sara El Maakoul, Hajar Fitah, N. Ouzeddoun, Loubna Benamar","doi":"10.25796/bdd.v7i1.83363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of repeat peritonitis, defined as the occurrence of peritonitis more than 4 weeks after the end of appropriate antibiotic treatment for a previous episode involving the same germ, remains limited.\nMethods: We studied the outcomes of 26 episodes of repeat peritonitis between 2006 and 2024 (Repeat Group) and compared them with 23 episodes of relapsing peritonitis (Relapse Group) and 84 episodes of peritonitis preceded by 4 weeks or more by another episode with a different organism (Control Group).\nResults: The majority of cases of repeat peritonitis are caused by gram-positive organisms (65.5%), predominantly Staphylococcus aureus (38.5%), whereas most episodes of relapsing peritonitis are culture-negative (69.5%), followed by gram-negative bacilli episodes (17.4%). Exit site infection is significantly associated with PD peritonitis. Gram-positive cocci are responsible for 95.5% of exit site infections, mainly due to Staphylococcus aureus. In the Repeat Group, 14 (66%) patients achieved primary response, and 10 (47%) of them reached complete cure. After the first episode of repeat peritonitis, 3 (14%) patients had their catheter removed and were transferred to long-term hemodialysis. ; however, the risk of developing relapsing peritonitis was 4.7%, and recurrent peritonitis was 9.5%.\nConclusion: The definition of repeat peritonitis is clear. Despite a favorable outcome with antibiotic treatment, the risk of further episodes of peritonitis remains high, threatening the time on peritoneal dialysis therapy and the life of the patient.\n ","PeriodicalId":490962,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin de la dialyse à domicile","volume":"11 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repeat peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis : A cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Nabil Hmaidouch, Sara El Maakoul, Hajar Fitah, N. Ouzeddoun, Loubna Benamar\",\"doi\":\"10.25796/bdd.v7i1.83363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of repeat peritonitis, defined as the occurrence of peritonitis more than 4 weeks after the end of appropriate antibiotic treatment for a previous episode involving the same germ, remains limited.\\nMethods: We studied the outcomes of 26 episodes of repeat peritonitis between 2006 and 2024 (Repeat Group) and compared them with 23 episodes of relapsing peritonitis (Relapse Group) and 84 episodes of peritonitis preceded by 4 weeks or more by another episode with a different organism (Control Group).\\nResults: The majority of cases of repeat peritonitis are caused by gram-positive organisms (65.5%), predominantly Staphylococcus aureus (38.5%), whereas most episodes of relapsing peritonitis are culture-negative (69.5%), followed by gram-negative bacilli episodes (17.4%). Exit site infection is significantly associated with PD peritonitis. Gram-positive cocci are responsible for 95.5% of exit site infections, mainly due to Staphylococcus aureus. In the Repeat Group, 14 (66%) patients achieved primary response, and 10 (47%) of them reached complete cure. After the first episode of repeat peritonitis, 3 (14%) patients had their catheter removed and were transferred to long-term hemodialysis. ; however, the risk of developing relapsing peritonitis was 4.7%, and recurrent peritonitis was 9.5%.\\nConclusion: The definition of repeat peritonitis is clear. Despite a favorable outcome with antibiotic treatment, the risk of further episodes of peritonitis remains high, threatening the time on peritoneal dialysis therapy and the life of the patient.\\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":490962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin de la dialyse à domicile\",\"volume\":\"11 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin de la dialyse à domicile\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25796/bdd.v7i1.83363\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin de la dialyse à domicile","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25796/bdd.v7i1.83363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:重复性腹膜炎是指在前一次涉及相同病菌的腹膜炎结束适当的抗生素治疗 4 周以上后发生的腹膜炎,对重复性腹膜炎的病理生理机制的了解仍然有限:我们研究了2006年至2024年间26例重复腹膜炎病例(重复组)的治疗结果,并将其与23例复发腹膜炎病例(复发组)和84例腹膜炎病例(对照组)进行了比较:大多数复发性腹膜炎病例是由革兰氏阳性菌(65.5%)引起的,主要是金黄色葡萄球菌(38.5%),而大多数复发性腹膜炎病例的培养结果为阴性(69.5%),其次是革兰氏阴性杆菌病例(17.4%)。出口部位感染与腹膜炎密切相关。革兰氏阳性球菌占出口部位感染的 95.5%,主要由金黄色葡萄球菌引起。在复发组中,14 例(66%)患者获得了初步应答,其中 10 例(47%)患者达到了完全治愈。首次腹膜炎复发后,3 名患者(14%)拔除了导管,转为长期血液透析;但腹膜炎复发的风险为 4.7%,腹膜炎复发的风险为 9.5%:结论:复发性腹膜炎的定义是明确的。结论:重复腹膜炎的定义很明确,尽管抗生素治疗效果良好,但再次发生腹膜炎的风险仍然很高,危及腹膜透析治疗的时间和患者的生命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Repeat peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis : A cohort study
Introduction: The understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of repeat peritonitis, defined as the occurrence of peritonitis more than 4 weeks after the end of appropriate antibiotic treatment for a previous episode involving the same germ, remains limited. Methods: We studied the outcomes of 26 episodes of repeat peritonitis between 2006 and 2024 (Repeat Group) and compared them with 23 episodes of relapsing peritonitis (Relapse Group) and 84 episodes of peritonitis preceded by 4 weeks or more by another episode with a different organism (Control Group). Results: The majority of cases of repeat peritonitis are caused by gram-positive organisms (65.5%), predominantly Staphylococcus aureus (38.5%), whereas most episodes of relapsing peritonitis are culture-negative (69.5%), followed by gram-negative bacilli episodes (17.4%). Exit site infection is significantly associated with PD peritonitis. Gram-positive cocci are responsible for 95.5% of exit site infections, mainly due to Staphylococcus aureus. In the Repeat Group, 14 (66%) patients achieved primary response, and 10 (47%) of them reached complete cure. After the first episode of repeat peritonitis, 3 (14%) patients had their catheter removed and were transferred to long-term hemodialysis. ; however, the risk of developing relapsing peritonitis was 4.7%, and recurrent peritonitis was 9.5%. Conclusion: The definition of repeat peritonitis is clear. Despite a favorable outcome with antibiotic treatment, the risk of further episodes of peritonitis remains high, threatening the time on peritoneal dialysis therapy and the life of the patient.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Péritonite à Kocuria Rhizophila en dialyse péritonéale : A propos de 2 cas et revue de la littérature Retour d’expérience de deux patients traités par Hémodialyse quotidienne à domicile (HDQ) avec traitement d’eau autonome. Repeat peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis : A cohort study Motifs et devenir des patients transférés de l’hémodialyse à la dialyse péritonéale en milieu subsaharien : exemple du CHU Aristide Le Dantec de Dakar Témoignage d’un patient en hémodialyse longue nocturne à domicile sur cycleur conventionnel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1