Savannah Whitfield, Caryn Hazard, Brittnee Haynes, Todd Coffey, Launa Lynch, Sarah Davis
{"title":"现场同伴指导对个人和专业发展、减轻压力以及轻松过渡到医学教育体系的影响。","authors":"Savannah Whitfield, Caryn Hazard, Brittnee Haynes, Todd Coffey, Launa Lynch, Sarah Davis","doi":"10.1515/jom-2023-0086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\nMentorship aids in the transition into the medical education system, which is a demanding and stressful time for learners. The development of new medical schools to offset the physician shortage has posed a challenge in that the inaugural class of students lacks an upperclassman cohort as a resource for advice and mentorship. Mentorship has proven to have positive impacts on three domains: personal and professional development (PPD), stress reduction (SR), and ease of transition (ET) into medical school.\n\n\nOBJECTIVES\nThe purpose of this study was to identify sources of mentorship within the medical education system and compare the subjective growth of the inaugural and second classes of a newly established medical school in the three domains.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe inaugural and second classes at a newly established medical school completed an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved anonymous survey with questions pertaining to unidentifiable demographics, sources of mentorship, and a five-point Likert scale assessing characteristics related to the three domains.\n\n\nRESULTS\nTwenty-three students responded to the survey. The second class (n=9) rated their growth higher in all three domains compared to the inaugural class (n=14). The inaugural class utilized the faculty mentor the most (11/14, 78.6 %). The second class utilized the on-site peer mentor the most (9/9, 100 %). Qualitative data analysis led to the emergence of three themes: (1) students utilizing their faculty mentor had the greatest growth in PPD and ET; (2) students utilizing on-site peer mentorship reporting the greatest growth in SR; and (3) informal peer mentorship utilization correlating with less growth in the three domains.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nOur study demonstrates the profound impact that mentorship has on growth in the three domains regardless of the type of mentorship utilized. The benefits, specifically with regard to SR, of an on-site peer mentorship program may not have been satisfied by other sources of mentorship.","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On-site peer mentorship's effect on personal and professional development, stress reduction, and ease of transition into the medical education system.\",\"authors\":\"Savannah Whitfield, Caryn Hazard, Brittnee Haynes, Todd Coffey, Launa Lynch, Sarah Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jom-2023-0086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"CONTEXT\\nMentorship aids in the transition into the medical education system, which is a demanding and stressful time for learners. The development of new medical schools to offset the physician shortage has posed a challenge in that the inaugural class of students lacks an upperclassman cohort as a resource for advice and mentorship. Mentorship has proven to have positive impacts on three domains: personal and professional development (PPD), stress reduction (SR), and ease of transition (ET) into medical school.\\n\\n\\nOBJECTIVES\\nThe purpose of this study was to identify sources of mentorship within the medical education system and compare the subjective growth of the inaugural and second classes of a newly established medical school in the three domains.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nThe inaugural and second classes at a newly established medical school completed an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved anonymous survey with questions pertaining to unidentifiable demographics, sources of mentorship, and a five-point Likert scale assessing characteristics related to the three domains.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nTwenty-three students responded to the survey. The second class (n=9) rated their growth higher in all three domains compared to the inaugural class (n=14). The inaugural class utilized the faculty mentor the most (11/14, 78.6 %). The second class utilized the on-site peer mentor the most (9/9, 100 %). Qualitative data analysis led to the emergence of three themes: (1) students utilizing their faculty mentor had the greatest growth in PPD and ET; (2) students utilizing on-site peer mentorship reporting the greatest growth in SR; and (3) informal peer mentorship utilization correlating with less growth in the three domains.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nOur study demonstrates the profound impact that mentorship has on growth in the three domains regardless of the type of mentorship utilized. The benefits, specifically with regard to SR, of an on-site peer mentorship program may not have been satisfied by other sources of mentorship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2023-0086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2023-0086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
CONTEXTM导师制有助于学生过渡到医学教育体系,这对学生来说是一段艰苦而紧张的时期。为解决医生短缺问题而建立的新医学院面临着一个挑战,那就是首届学生缺乏高年级学生作为咨询和指导资源。事实证明,导师制对以下三个方面有积极影响:个人和专业发展(PPD)、减压(SR)和轻松过渡到医学院(ET)。目的本研究旨在确定医学教育体系中的导师制来源,并比较一所新成立医学院的首届学生和第二届学生在这三个方面的主观成长。方法:一所新成立的医学院的首届和第二届学生完成了一份经机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的匿名调查,调查问题涉及无法识别的人口统计数据、导师的来源,以及评估与三个领域相关的特征的五点李克特量表。与首届学生(14 人)相比,第二届学生(9 人)对自己在所有三个领域的成长评价更高。首届学生对教师导师的利用率最高(11/14,78.6%)。第二个班级使用现场同伴导师最多(9/9,100%)。定性数据分析得出了三个主题:(1) 利用教师指导的学生在 PPD 和 ET 方面的增长最大;(2) 利用现场同伴指导的学生在 SR 方面的增长最大;(3) 利用非正式同伴指导的学生在三个领域的增长较少。现场同伴指导计划的好处,特别是在 SR 方面,可能是其他指导来源无法满足的。
On-site peer mentorship's effect on personal and professional development, stress reduction, and ease of transition into the medical education system.
CONTEXT
Mentorship aids in the transition into the medical education system, which is a demanding and stressful time for learners. The development of new medical schools to offset the physician shortage has posed a challenge in that the inaugural class of students lacks an upperclassman cohort as a resource for advice and mentorship. Mentorship has proven to have positive impacts on three domains: personal and professional development (PPD), stress reduction (SR), and ease of transition (ET) into medical school.
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to identify sources of mentorship within the medical education system and compare the subjective growth of the inaugural and second classes of a newly established medical school in the three domains.
METHODS
The inaugural and second classes at a newly established medical school completed an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved anonymous survey with questions pertaining to unidentifiable demographics, sources of mentorship, and a five-point Likert scale assessing characteristics related to the three domains.
RESULTS
Twenty-three students responded to the survey. The second class (n=9) rated their growth higher in all three domains compared to the inaugural class (n=14). The inaugural class utilized the faculty mentor the most (11/14, 78.6 %). The second class utilized the on-site peer mentor the most (9/9, 100 %). Qualitative data analysis led to the emergence of three themes: (1) students utilizing their faculty mentor had the greatest growth in PPD and ET; (2) students utilizing on-site peer mentorship reporting the greatest growth in SR; and (3) informal peer mentorship utilization correlating with less growth in the three domains.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study demonstrates the profound impact that mentorship has on growth in the three domains regardless of the type of mentorship utilized. The benefits, specifically with regard to SR, of an on-site peer mentorship program may not have been satisfied by other sources of mentorship.