Cailiang Gao, Huiting Liu, Lirong Zhou, Wei Huang, Xue Liu
{"title":"68Ga-FAPI PET/CT 与 18F-FDG PET/CT 在胃肿瘤原发和转移病灶中的头对头比较：系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Cailiang Gao, Huiting Liu, Lirong Zhou, Wei Huang, Xue Liu","doi":"10.1967/s002449912703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nOur study aims to head to head compare the application of gallium-68-fibroblast activation proteininhibitor (68Ga-FAPI) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT in primary and metastatic lesions of gastric tumor to determine the superior diagnostic tool.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nA systematic search, up to March 31, 2023, across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases utilized a data-specific Boolean logic strategy. Sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE) evaluations of 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in gastric cancer lesions were conducted. The quality of the studies was assessed using QUADAS-2, and publication bias was examined through Begg and Egger tests.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAnalysis involved 141 gastric tumor patients and 2753 metastatic lesions in five studies, with overall satisfactory study quality and no apparent publication bias. Patient-level data showed a combined SEN of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90-0.98) for 68Ga-FAPI and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77-0.89) for 18F-FDG. At the lesion level, combined SENs were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84-0.96) for 68Ga-FAPI and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.63-0.80) for 18F-FDG. The pooled SEN for detecting lymph node metastases was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74-0.82) for 68Ga-FAPI and 0.35 (95% CI: 0.30-0.39) for 18F-FDG, with pooled SPE values of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-0.99) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.98), respectively. For detecting distant metastases, pooled SEN values were 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.98) and 0.69 (95% CI: 0.66-0.72) for 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG, with pooled SPE values of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82-0.89) and 0.64 (95% CI: 0.59-0.68), respectively.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThis meta-analysis concluded that 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT was significantly more sensitive than 18F-FDG PET/CT in assessing primary gastric tumors, lymph nodes, and distant metastases, but the difference in the specificity of lymph node metastasis was not significant.","PeriodicalId":12871,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic journal of nuclear medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Head to head comparison of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT with 18F-FDG PET/CT in primary and metastatic lesions of gastric tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Cailiang Gao, Huiting Liu, Lirong Zhou, Wei Huang, Xue Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1967/s002449912703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\nOur study aims to head to head compare the application of gallium-68-fibroblast activation proteininhibitor (68Ga-FAPI) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT in primary and metastatic lesions of gastric tumor to determine the superior diagnostic tool.\\n\\n\\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\\nA systematic search, up to March 31, 2023, across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases utilized a data-specific Boolean logic strategy. Sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE) evaluations of 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in gastric cancer lesions were conducted. The quality of the studies was assessed using QUADAS-2, and publication bias was examined through Begg and Egger tests.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nAnalysis involved 141 gastric tumor patients and 2753 metastatic lesions in five studies, with overall satisfactory study quality and no apparent publication bias. Patient-level data showed a combined SEN of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90-0.98) for 68Ga-FAPI and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77-0.89) for 18F-FDG. At the lesion level, combined SENs were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84-0.96) for 68Ga-FAPI and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.63-0.80) for 18F-FDG. The pooled SEN for detecting lymph node metastases was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74-0.82) for 68Ga-FAPI and 0.35 (95% CI: 0.30-0.39) for 18F-FDG, with pooled SPE values of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-0.99) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.98), respectively. For detecting distant metastases, pooled SEN values were 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.98) and 0.69 (95% CI: 0.66-0.72) for 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG, with pooled SPE values of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82-0.89) and 0.64 (95% CI: 0.59-0.68), respectively.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nThis meta-analysis concluded that 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT was significantly more sensitive than 18F-FDG PET/CT in assessing primary gastric tumors, lymph nodes, and distant metastases, but the difference in the specificity of lymph node metastasis was not significant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hellenic journal of nuclear medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hellenic journal of nuclear medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1967/s002449912703\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hellenic journal of nuclear medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1967/s002449912703","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Head to head comparison of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT with 18F-FDG PET/CT in primary and metastatic lesions of gastric tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
Our study aims to head to head compare the application of gallium-68-fibroblast activation proteininhibitor (68Ga-FAPI) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT in primary and metastatic lesions of gastric tumor to determine the superior diagnostic tool.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic search, up to March 31, 2023, across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases utilized a data-specific Boolean logic strategy. Sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE) evaluations of 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in gastric cancer lesions were conducted. The quality of the studies was assessed using QUADAS-2, and publication bias was examined through Begg and Egger tests.
RESULTS
Analysis involved 141 gastric tumor patients and 2753 metastatic lesions in five studies, with overall satisfactory study quality and no apparent publication bias. Patient-level data showed a combined SEN of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90-0.98) for 68Ga-FAPI and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77-0.89) for 18F-FDG. At the lesion level, combined SENs were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84-0.96) for 68Ga-FAPI and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.63-0.80) for 18F-FDG. The pooled SEN for detecting lymph node metastases was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74-0.82) for 68Ga-FAPI and 0.35 (95% CI: 0.30-0.39) for 18F-FDG, with pooled SPE values of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-0.99) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.98), respectively. For detecting distant metastases, pooled SEN values were 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.98) and 0.69 (95% CI: 0.66-0.72) for 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG, with pooled SPE values of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82-0.89) and 0.64 (95% CI: 0.59-0.68), respectively.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis concluded that 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT was significantly more sensitive than 18F-FDG PET/CT in assessing primary gastric tumors, lymph nodes, and distant metastases, but the difference in the specificity of lymph node metastasis was not significant.
期刊介绍：
The Hellenic Journal of Nuclear Medicine published by the Hellenic Society of
Nuclear Medicine in Thessaloniki, aims to contribute to research, to education and
cover the scientific and professional interests of physicians, in the field of nuclear
medicine and in medicine in general. The journal may publish papers of nuclear
medicine and also papers that refer to related subjects as dosimetry, computer science,
targeting of gene expression, radioimmunoassay, radiation protection, biology, cell
trafficking, related historical brief reviews and other related subjects. Original papers
are preferred. The journal may after special agreement publish supplements covering
important subjects, dully reviewed and subscripted separately.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
