产后妇女综合患者报告结果集可行性评估:产妇患者报告结果集(MOMs 研究)

L. O'Byrne, G. Maher, Jill M Mitchell, Ali Khashan, Richard Greene, John Browne, Fergus McCarthy
{"title":"产后妇女综合患者报告结果集可行性评估:产妇患者报告结果集(MOMs 研究)","authors":"L. O'Byrne, G. Maher, Jill M Mitchell, Ali Khashan, Richard Greene, John Browne, Fergus McCarthy","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13876.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Our team published a systematic review highlighting the lack of a comprehensive measure of health and wellbeing for postpartum women. The aim of this project was to examine the feasibility of a combination of existing measures, chosen for their coverage of key domains and psychometric rigour. The primary objective was to examine the validity and completeness of the novel outcome set within the first week (T1), 6 weeks (T2), and 12 weeks postpartum (T3). Secondary objectives were to examine concordance between patient-clinician reports of delivery complications and assess postpartum response rates. Methods Participants completed demographic and delivery details as well as completing a combination of existing PROM tools: the PQoL (Postpartum women’s Quality of life questionnaire), ICIQ-UI-SF (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form) and 2 sexual health questions. Participants also rated the validity of these tools. Results The response rates were 69% (n=59)T1, 67% (n=57)T2 and 48% (41)T3. Complete responses at T1 55% (n=47),T2 53% (n=45)T3 44% (n=37). The median time taken to complete the survey was 7 minutes. Across the three time points ~70% (70.2% T1, 73.3% T2, 69% T3) of respondents felt that all outcomes that mattered most to them were captured. The difference between complication rates reported by patients and clinicians was 0% for neonatal and high-dependency unit admissions. Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) was reported by 2 patients and 1 clinician. Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) was reported by 4 (28%) despite electronic records recording PPH occurrence in 14 patients at T1. Conclusions A combination of tools and additional sexual health questions collected from postpartum women using an online survey across three postnatal time points appears feasible and has good validity and completeness. Patient-clinician concordance in the reporting of complication rates was high for all but PPH where patients tended to report lower rates.","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the feasibility of a comprehensive patient reported outcome set for postpartum women: the maternal patient-reported outcome set (MOMs Study)\",\"authors\":\"L. O'Byrne, G. Maher, Jill M Mitchell, Ali Khashan, Richard Greene, John Browne, Fergus McCarthy\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/hrbopenres.13876.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Our team published a systematic review highlighting the lack of a comprehensive measure of health and wellbeing for postpartum women. The aim of this project was to examine the feasibility of a combination of existing measures, chosen for their coverage of key domains and psychometric rigour. The primary objective was to examine the validity and completeness of the novel outcome set within the first week (T1), 6 weeks (T2), and 12 weeks postpartum (T3). Secondary objectives were to examine concordance between patient-clinician reports of delivery complications and assess postpartum response rates. Methods Participants completed demographic and delivery details as well as completing a combination of existing PROM tools: the PQoL (Postpartum women’s Quality of life questionnaire), ICIQ-UI-SF (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form) and 2 sexual health questions. Participants also rated the validity of these tools. Results The response rates were 69% (n=59)T1, 67% (n=57)T2 and 48% (41)T3. Complete responses at T1 55% (n=47),T2 53% (n=45)T3 44% (n=37). The median time taken to complete the survey was 7 minutes. Across the three time points ~70% (70.2% T1, 73.3% T2, 69% T3) of respondents felt that all outcomes that mattered most to them were captured. The difference between complication rates reported by patients and clinicians was 0% for neonatal and high-dependency unit admissions. Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) was reported by 2 patients and 1 clinician. Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) was reported by 4 (28%) despite electronic records recording PPH occurrence in 14 patients at T1. Conclusions A combination of tools and additional sexual health questions collected from postpartum women using an online survey across three postnatal time points appears feasible and has good validity and completeness. Patient-clinician concordance in the reporting of complication rates was high for all but PPH where patients tended to report lower rates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HRB open research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HRB open research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13876.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HRB open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13876.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 我们的团队发表了一篇系统性综述,强调了产后妇女的健康和幸福缺乏全面的衡量标准。本项目旨在研究现有测量方法组合的可行性,这些测量方法是根据其关键领域的覆盖范围和心理测量的严谨性而选择的。首要目标是检验产后第一周(T1)、产后 6 周(T2)和产后 12 周(T3)的新结果集的有效性和完整性。次要目标是检查患者和医生对分娩并发症报告的一致性,并评估产后反应率。方法 参与者填写人口统计学和分娩详细信息,并完成现有的 PROM 工具组合:PQoL(产后妇女生活质量问卷)、ICIQ-UI-SF(尿失禁国际咨询问卷-尿失禁简表)和 2 个性健康问题。参与者还对这些工具的有效性进行了评分。结果 T1、T2 和 T3 的回复率分别为 69%(59 人)、67%(57 人)和 48%(41 人)。完整回答率分别为:T1 55% (n=47)、T2 53% (n=45)、T3 44% (n=37)。完成调查所用时间的中位数为 7 分钟。在三个时间点中,约 70% 的受访者(70.2% T1、73.3% T2、69% T3)认为所有对他们来说最重要的结果都被记录了下来。患者和临床医生报告的并发症发生率在新生儿和重症监护室入院患者中的差异为 0%。有 2 名患者和 1 名临床医生报告了产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)。产后出血(PPH)有 4 例(28%),尽管电子记录显示在 T1 有 14 例患者发生了 PPH。结论 在产后三个时间点上,通过在线调查从产后妇女处收集工具和附加性健康问题的组合似乎是可行的,并且具有良好的有效性和完整性。在所有并发症发生率的报告中,除 PPH 外,患者与医生的一致性都很高,因为患者报告的 PPH 发生率往往较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of the feasibility of a comprehensive patient reported outcome set for postpartum women: the maternal patient-reported outcome set (MOMs Study)
Background Our team published a systematic review highlighting the lack of a comprehensive measure of health and wellbeing for postpartum women. The aim of this project was to examine the feasibility of a combination of existing measures, chosen for their coverage of key domains and psychometric rigour. The primary objective was to examine the validity and completeness of the novel outcome set within the first week (T1), 6 weeks (T2), and 12 weeks postpartum (T3). Secondary objectives were to examine concordance between patient-clinician reports of delivery complications and assess postpartum response rates. Methods Participants completed demographic and delivery details as well as completing a combination of existing PROM tools: the PQoL (Postpartum women’s Quality of life questionnaire), ICIQ-UI-SF (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form) and 2 sexual health questions. Participants also rated the validity of these tools. Results The response rates were 69% (n=59)T1, 67% (n=57)T2 and 48% (41)T3. Complete responses at T1 55% (n=47),T2 53% (n=45)T3 44% (n=37). The median time taken to complete the survey was 7 minutes. Across the three time points ~70% (70.2% T1, 73.3% T2, 69% T3) of respondents felt that all outcomes that mattered most to them were captured. The difference between complication rates reported by patients and clinicians was 0% for neonatal and high-dependency unit admissions. Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) was reported by 2 patients and 1 clinician. Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) was reported by 4 (28%) despite electronic records recording PPH occurrence in 14 patients at T1. Conclusions A combination of tools and additional sexual health questions collected from postpartum women using an online survey across three postnatal time points appears feasible and has good validity and completeness. Patient-clinician concordance in the reporting of complication rates was high for all but PPH where patients tended to report lower rates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tracking aspects of healthcare activity during the first nine months of COVID-19 in Ireland: a secondary analysis of publicly available data. Diagnostic test accuracy of screening tools for the detection of neurocognitive disorders in older adults post-trauma: A protocol for a systematic review. Altmetric coverage of health research in Ireland 2017-2023: a protocol for a cross-sectional analysis. Contextual factors and intentional rounding in acute hospitals: understanding what works, for whom, in what settings: a realist synthesis protocol. What is known from the existing literature about the treatment of Mallet Injury using 3D printed splints? A Scoping Review Protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1