欧洲央行加息对匈牙利银行间同业拆借利率和欧元/匈牙利福林汇率有溢出效应吗?使用 Diebold-Yilmaz 溢出表的五变量 VAR 模型方法

IF 0.9 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1002/jcaf.22716
Molnar Albert, Csiszárik-Kocsír Ágnes
{"title":"欧洲央行加息对匈牙利银行间同业拆借利率和欧元/匈牙利福林汇率有溢出效应吗?使用 Diebold-Yilmaz 溢出表的五变量 VAR 模型方法","authors":"Molnar Albert,&nbsp;Csiszárik-Kocsír Ágnes","doi":"10.1002/jcaf.22716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We intend to show the directional volatility spillovers between the European short term interbank lending rates (3-month Euro Interbank Offered Rate [EURIBOR] and Euro Short-Term Rate [ESTR]) and the Hungarian Budapest Interbank Offered Rate (BUBOR) and Euro-Hungarian Forint exchange rate. To determine the extent to which the variables affect each other's volatilities we build a five-variable vector autoregression (VAR) and determine the spillover table like in Diebold-Yilmaz's 2012 work. This methodology is preferred to a simple impulse response function (IRF) because we manage to avoid the problem of non-orthogonal innovations via the generalized forecast error variance decomposition framework. The issue of variable ordering, therefore, does not arise. We focus on three episodes of increased volatility in Hungarian and European short-term interest rates: Q3–Q4 of 2019, Q1 of 2020 and Q3 of 2022. These episodes correspond to volatility spikes in EU markets that to some extent had a measurable spillover effect on Hungarian interbank rates. We find that on average, across the entire sample of 957 observations, about 6.3% of the volatility forecast error variance in all five European and Hungarian variables comes from spillovers. The total and directional spillovers over the sample are extremely low. We conclude that the European Central Bank's surprise policy decisions have a marginal impact on Hungarian interbank rates. We also find that BUBOR is primarily a net receiver of spillovers from the MAX short-term government bond benchmark rather than the EURIBOR—this disproved our initial considerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":44561,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcaf.22716","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do ECB's rate hikes have spillover effects on the Hungarian BUBOR and the EUR/HUF exchange rate? A five-variable VAR model approach using the Diebold-Yilmaz spillover table\",\"authors\":\"Molnar Albert,&nbsp;Csiszárik-Kocsír Ágnes\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcaf.22716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We intend to show the directional volatility spillovers between the European short term interbank lending rates (3-month Euro Interbank Offered Rate [EURIBOR] and Euro Short-Term Rate [ESTR]) and the Hungarian Budapest Interbank Offered Rate (BUBOR) and Euro-Hungarian Forint exchange rate. To determine the extent to which the variables affect each other's volatilities we build a five-variable vector autoregression (VAR) and determine the spillover table like in Diebold-Yilmaz's 2012 work. This methodology is preferred to a simple impulse response function (IRF) because we manage to avoid the problem of non-orthogonal innovations via the generalized forecast error variance decomposition framework. The issue of variable ordering, therefore, does not arise. We focus on three episodes of increased volatility in Hungarian and European short-term interest rates: Q3–Q4 of 2019, Q1 of 2020 and Q3 of 2022. These episodes correspond to volatility spikes in EU markets that to some extent had a measurable spillover effect on Hungarian interbank rates. We find that on average, across the entire sample of 957 observations, about 6.3% of the volatility forecast error variance in all five European and Hungarian variables comes from spillovers. The total and directional spillovers over the sample are extremely low. We conclude that the European Central Bank's surprise policy decisions have a marginal impact on Hungarian interbank rates. We also find that BUBOR is primarily a net receiver of spillovers from the MAX short-term government bond benchmark rather than the EURIBOR—this disproved our initial considerations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcaf.22716\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcaf.22716\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcaf.22716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们打算展示欧洲短期银行间拆借利率(3 个月欧元银行间拆借利率[EURIBOR]和欧元短期利率[ESTR])与匈牙利布达佩斯银行间拆借利率(BUBOR)和欧元-匈牙利福林汇率之间的定向波动溢出效应。为了确定这些变量对彼此波动率的影响程度,我们建立了一个五变量向量自回归(VAR),并像 Diebold-Yilmaz 2012 年的研究一样确定了溢出表。这种方法优于简单的脉冲响应函数(IRF),因为我们可以通过广义预测误差方差分解框架来避免非正交创新的问题。因此,不存在变量排序问题。我们重点关注匈牙利和欧洲短期利率波动加剧的三个事件:2019 年第三季度至第四季度、2020 年第一季度和 2022 年第三季度。这些事件与欧盟市场的波动高峰相对应,在一定程度上对匈牙利银行间利率产生了可衡量的溢出效应。我们发现,在整个 957 个观测样本中,欧洲和匈牙利所有五个变量的波动预测误差方差平均约有 6.3% 来自溢出效应。整个样本的总溢出效应和定向溢出效应都非常低。我们的结论是,欧洲中央银行的意外政策决定对匈牙利银行间利率的影响微乎其微。我们还发现 BUBOR 主要是 MAX 短期政府债券基准溢出效应的净接收者,而不是 EURIBOR--这推翻了我们最初的想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do ECB's rate hikes have spillover effects on the Hungarian BUBOR and the EUR/HUF exchange rate? A five-variable VAR model approach using the Diebold-Yilmaz spillover table

We intend to show the directional volatility spillovers between the European short term interbank lending rates (3-month Euro Interbank Offered Rate [EURIBOR] and Euro Short-Term Rate [ESTR]) and the Hungarian Budapest Interbank Offered Rate (BUBOR) and Euro-Hungarian Forint exchange rate. To determine the extent to which the variables affect each other's volatilities we build a five-variable vector autoregression (VAR) and determine the spillover table like in Diebold-Yilmaz's 2012 work. This methodology is preferred to a simple impulse response function (IRF) because we manage to avoid the problem of non-orthogonal innovations via the generalized forecast error variance decomposition framework. The issue of variable ordering, therefore, does not arise. We focus on three episodes of increased volatility in Hungarian and European short-term interest rates: Q3–Q4 of 2019, Q1 of 2020 and Q3 of 2022. These episodes correspond to volatility spikes in EU markets that to some extent had a measurable spillover effect on Hungarian interbank rates. We find that on average, across the entire sample of 957 observations, about 6.3% of the volatility forecast error variance in all five European and Hungarian variables comes from spillovers. The total and directional spillovers over the sample are extremely low. We conclude that the European Central Bank's surprise policy decisions have a marginal impact on Hungarian interbank rates. We also find that BUBOR is primarily a net receiver of spillovers from the MAX short-term government bond benchmark rather than the EURIBOR—this disproved our initial considerations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
69
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Do CEO gender and narcissism jointly affect CEO letter readability? An accountant in the C-suite: Chief Accounting Officers and asymmetric timely loss recognition Earnings quality of multinational corporations: Evidence from Latin America before and after IFRS implementation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1