语言教育中的文学性》评论(Paesani 和 Menke)

IF 0.6 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1111/tger.12276
Karin Maxey
{"title":"语言教育中的文学性》评论(Paesani 和 Menke)","authors":"Karin Maxey","doi":"10.1111/tger.12276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Kate Paesani and Mandy Menke advance the discourse on multiliteracies in language education with this practical volume for educators. They address teachers of all languages and levels, who may have varying levels of interest in shifting to a multiliteracies approach. Intended as a guidebook, the volume's two parts address the theory and practice of implementing this approach in language pedagogy and the practical aspects of integrating it with frameworks teachers may already know and use, like communicative language teaching. The companion website offers supplemental materials such as sample lesson plans and structured templates that teachers can use to plan their own units and lessons. It is easy to imagine this book being used as part of a reading group for language educators (perhaps facilitated by a language or teaching center) or as part of a course on second language pedagogy for newer instructors.</p><p>The book is divided into two parts, which address the theory and the practice of adopting a multiliteracies approach. Part I summarizes previous research on multiliteracies in backward design (Chapter 2), discusses how to set clear and achievable learning objectives and how to communicate them to students (Chapter 3), provides practical ideas for selecting and designing activities around texts, defined broadly (Chapter 4), and establishes principles and practices for designing literacies-based assessments (Chapter 5).</p><p>Part II presents the four processes of multiliteracies, which are loosely based on Bloom's original taxonomy: experiencing, conceptualizing, analyzing, and applying. Paesani and Menke provide activity types for each of the processes. This section also addresses the real concerns that teachers might hold with regard to designing and implementing multiliteracies pedagogy. Instructors may worry about the challenge of designing multiliteracies lessons for novice-level learners, the extra time required to find texts, planning lessons that carry students through all four multiliteracies processes, and the possibility that teachers’ courses may exist within a sequence where not every course takes the same approach, especially in higher education, but in K-12 settings as well.</p><p>In the five chapters of Part II, the authors present practical strategies for aligning curriculum and teaching practices with objectives and assessments and for using backward design within a multiliteracies framework. Chapter 6 dives more deeply into the four knowledge processes central to multiliteracies—experiencing, conceptualizing, analyzing, and applying—and shows how they fit into the seven stages of a lesson. The goals of employing these processes are twofold: (1) to ensure that students understand texts and broader genre conventions and (2) to make sure that they can create context- and audience-appropriate texts themselves. Each following chapter addresses one of the four knowledge processes, defining the term and explaining its role in multiliteracies, and then offering activity types that engage students in that process. The authors also address teacher concerns around adopting each knowledge process, such as extended planning time and modifying textbook activities to situate them within a multiliteracies framework. Activity development takes time; and when instructors work in a context where students are required to buy a textbook and they are required to use it, the skill of adapting existing materials to fit with the desired approach to learning saves teachers from developing activities from scratch. Such a strategy may also be useful as teachers transition from another approach to a multiliteracies one.</p><p>This volume could serve several useful purposes for teachers in a range of settings and with varied levels of teaching experience. Those who are just beginning to learn about multiliteracies could use it to design one unit in their course or implement facets of the approach into several units. Instructors already familiar with this framework may find new and fresh ideas here, particularly regarding activity types and assessment strategies. To my knowledge, not much research exists on the effectiveness of multiliteracies yet, compared to other pedagogies such as Communicative Language Teaching. Much of the research cited in this volume is from the authors and their previous co-authors, so it may also provide educators with a more research-oriented mindset and an impetus to learn more about multiliteracies’ effectiveness. The field of multiliteracies research is still small but is also growing as volumes like this one draw attention to its practical implementation and make multiliteracies as a teaching practice less nebulous, more approachable, and more feasible to implement. Furthermore, the accompanying online resources could be helpful to teachers at all levels for designing lessons or planning curricula. The major flaw in this book is its failure to address the ways that multiliteracies can also reach minoritized and underserved populations of students in the language classroom. While the authors nod briefly to language-specific projects that address decolonizing language-specific curricula, there is no other discussion of the ways that a multiliteracies framework could foster a more inclusive language classroom. Overall, the book is a practical addition to any language educator's or teacher trainer's library and one that makes a multiliteracies approach feel practical and possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":43693,"journal":{"name":"Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German","volume":"57 1","pages":"140-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tger.12276","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of Literacies in Language Education (Paesani and Menke)\",\"authors\":\"Karin Maxey\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tger.12276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Kate Paesani and Mandy Menke advance the discourse on multiliteracies in language education with this practical volume for educators. They address teachers of all languages and levels, who may have varying levels of interest in shifting to a multiliteracies approach. Intended as a guidebook, the volume's two parts address the theory and practice of implementing this approach in language pedagogy and the practical aspects of integrating it with frameworks teachers may already know and use, like communicative language teaching. The companion website offers supplemental materials such as sample lesson plans and structured templates that teachers can use to plan their own units and lessons. It is easy to imagine this book being used as part of a reading group for language educators (perhaps facilitated by a language or teaching center) or as part of a course on second language pedagogy for newer instructors.</p><p>The book is divided into two parts, which address the theory and the practice of adopting a multiliteracies approach. Part I summarizes previous research on multiliteracies in backward design (Chapter 2), discusses how to set clear and achievable learning objectives and how to communicate them to students (Chapter 3), provides practical ideas for selecting and designing activities around texts, defined broadly (Chapter 4), and establishes principles and practices for designing literacies-based assessments (Chapter 5).</p><p>Part II presents the four processes of multiliteracies, which are loosely based on Bloom's original taxonomy: experiencing, conceptualizing, analyzing, and applying. Paesani and Menke provide activity types for each of the processes. This section also addresses the real concerns that teachers might hold with regard to designing and implementing multiliteracies pedagogy. Instructors may worry about the challenge of designing multiliteracies lessons for novice-level learners, the extra time required to find texts, planning lessons that carry students through all four multiliteracies processes, and the possibility that teachers’ courses may exist within a sequence where not every course takes the same approach, especially in higher education, but in K-12 settings as well.</p><p>In the five chapters of Part II, the authors present practical strategies for aligning curriculum and teaching practices with objectives and assessments and for using backward design within a multiliteracies framework. Chapter 6 dives more deeply into the four knowledge processes central to multiliteracies—experiencing, conceptualizing, analyzing, and applying—and shows how they fit into the seven stages of a lesson. The goals of employing these processes are twofold: (1) to ensure that students understand texts and broader genre conventions and (2) to make sure that they can create context- and audience-appropriate texts themselves. Each following chapter addresses one of the four knowledge processes, defining the term and explaining its role in multiliteracies, and then offering activity types that engage students in that process. The authors also address teacher concerns around adopting each knowledge process, such as extended planning time and modifying textbook activities to situate them within a multiliteracies framework. Activity development takes time; and when instructors work in a context where students are required to buy a textbook and they are required to use it, the skill of adapting existing materials to fit with the desired approach to learning saves teachers from developing activities from scratch. Such a strategy may also be useful as teachers transition from another approach to a multiliteracies one.</p><p>This volume could serve several useful purposes for teachers in a range of settings and with varied levels of teaching experience. Those who are just beginning to learn about multiliteracies could use it to design one unit in their course or implement facets of the approach into several units. Instructors already familiar with this framework may find new and fresh ideas here, particularly regarding activity types and assessment strategies. To my knowledge, not much research exists on the effectiveness of multiliteracies yet, compared to other pedagogies such as Communicative Language Teaching. Much of the research cited in this volume is from the authors and their previous co-authors, so it may also provide educators with a more research-oriented mindset and an impetus to learn more about multiliteracies’ effectiveness. The field of multiliteracies research is still small but is also growing as volumes like this one draw attention to its practical implementation and make multiliteracies as a teaching practice less nebulous, more approachable, and more feasible to implement. Furthermore, the accompanying online resources could be helpful to teachers at all levels for designing lessons or planning curricula. The major flaw in this book is its failure to address the ways that multiliteracies can also reach minoritized and underserved populations of students in the language classroom. While the authors nod briefly to language-specific projects that address decolonizing language-specific curricula, there is no other discussion of the ways that a multiliteracies framework could foster a more inclusive language classroom. Overall, the book is a practical addition to any language educator's or teacher trainer's library and one that makes a multiliteracies approach feel practical and possible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"140-141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tger.12276\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tger.12276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tger.12276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本书的主要缺陷在于没有论述多元文学如何在语言课堂上帮助少数民族和得不到充分服务的学生群体。虽然作者简要地提到了针对特定语言的项目,以解决特定语言课程的非殖民化问题,但却没有讨论多元文学框架如何促进更具包容性的语言课堂。总之,这本书是语言教育工作者或教师培训者图书馆中的一本实用书籍,它让人感觉到多元文学方法是切实可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Review of Literacies in Language Education (Paesani and Menke)

Kate Paesani and Mandy Menke advance the discourse on multiliteracies in language education with this practical volume for educators. They address teachers of all languages and levels, who may have varying levels of interest in shifting to a multiliteracies approach. Intended as a guidebook, the volume's two parts address the theory and practice of implementing this approach in language pedagogy and the practical aspects of integrating it with frameworks teachers may already know and use, like communicative language teaching. The companion website offers supplemental materials such as sample lesson plans and structured templates that teachers can use to plan their own units and lessons. It is easy to imagine this book being used as part of a reading group for language educators (perhaps facilitated by a language or teaching center) or as part of a course on second language pedagogy for newer instructors.

The book is divided into two parts, which address the theory and the practice of adopting a multiliteracies approach. Part I summarizes previous research on multiliteracies in backward design (Chapter 2), discusses how to set clear and achievable learning objectives and how to communicate them to students (Chapter 3), provides practical ideas for selecting and designing activities around texts, defined broadly (Chapter 4), and establishes principles and practices for designing literacies-based assessments (Chapter 5).

Part II presents the four processes of multiliteracies, which are loosely based on Bloom's original taxonomy: experiencing, conceptualizing, analyzing, and applying. Paesani and Menke provide activity types for each of the processes. This section also addresses the real concerns that teachers might hold with regard to designing and implementing multiliteracies pedagogy. Instructors may worry about the challenge of designing multiliteracies lessons for novice-level learners, the extra time required to find texts, planning lessons that carry students through all four multiliteracies processes, and the possibility that teachers’ courses may exist within a sequence where not every course takes the same approach, especially in higher education, but in K-12 settings as well.

In the five chapters of Part II, the authors present practical strategies for aligning curriculum and teaching practices with objectives and assessments and for using backward design within a multiliteracies framework. Chapter 6 dives more deeply into the four knowledge processes central to multiliteracies—experiencing, conceptualizing, analyzing, and applying—and shows how they fit into the seven stages of a lesson. The goals of employing these processes are twofold: (1) to ensure that students understand texts and broader genre conventions and (2) to make sure that they can create context- and audience-appropriate texts themselves. Each following chapter addresses one of the four knowledge processes, defining the term and explaining its role in multiliteracies, and then offering activity types that engage students in that process. The authors also address teacher concerns around adopting each knowledge process, such as extended planning time and modifying textbook activities to situate them within a multiliteracies framework. Activity development takes time; and when instructors work in a context where students are required to buy a textbook and they are required to use it, the skill of adapting existing materials to fit with the desired approach to learning saves teachers from developing activities from scratch. Such a strategy may also be useful as teachers transition from another approach to a multiliteracies one.

This volume could serve several useful purposes for teachers in a range of settings and with varied levels of teaching experience. Those who are just beginning to learn about multiliteracies could use it to design one unit in their course or implement facets of the approach into several units. Instructors already familiar with this framework may find new and fresh ideas here, particularly regarding activity types and assessment strategies. To my knowledge, not much research exists on the effectiveness of multiliteracies yet, compared to other pedagogies such as Communicative Language Teaching. Much of the research cited in this volume is from the authors and their previous co-authors, so it may also provide educators with a more research-oriented mindset and an impetus to learn more about multiliteracies’ effectiveness. The field of multiliteracies research is still small but is also growing as volumes like this one draw attention to its practical implementation and make multiliteracies as a teaching practice less nebulous, more approachable, and more feasible to implement. Furthermore, the accompanying online resources could be helpful to teachers at all levels for designing lessons or planning curricula. The major flaw in this book is its failure to address the ways that multiliteracies can also reach minoritized and underserved populations of students in the language classroom. While the authors nod briefly to language-specific projects that address decolonizing language-specific curricula, there is no other discussion of the ways that a multiliteracies framework could foster a more inclusive language classroom. Overall, the book is a practical addition to any language educator's or teacher trainer's library and one that makes a multiliteracies approach feel practical and possible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German
Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Praxis articles and Forum on recruitment and retention Back in business! Professional German(s) at Rhodes College Uncertainty is in the Form: A functional, meaning-based approach to teaching ambiguity as author choice in Kafka's “Vor dem Gesetz” A collaboration between a high school and a college German program: Retention and articulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1