{"title":"宗教裁判所法庭上的皈依者身份谈判","authors":"Javier E. Díaz-Vera","doi":"10.1075/jhp.22011.dia","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper explores the processes of identity construction and negotiation through face work in a Portuguese\n Inquisition record, corresponding to the trial for Judaism of Catarina de Orta. Concentrating as much on the inquisitor’s\n questions as on the answers offered by the defendant, I show here that impoliteness and self-politeness co-occur in interaction in\n the Portuguese Inquisition courtroom discourse. On the one hand, the inquisitor makes abundant use of impoliteness strategies with\n at least three main aims: to exert his power over the defendant, to trigger specific negative emotions, and to attack her face and\n her credibility. On the other hand, the defendant’s answers display numerous features of self-politeness, aimed at saving her face\n from the inquisitor’s attacks and accusations. It is precisely through the interplay of impoliteness and self-politeness that the\n two competing narratives proposed by the accuser and the defendant are constructed and re-elaborated during every\n interrogation.","PeriodicalId":54081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Negotiating converso identities in the inquisition courtroom\",\"authors\":\"Javier E. Díaz-Vera\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jhp.22011.dia\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper explores the processes of identity construction and negotiation through face work in a Portuguese\\n Inquisition record, corresponding to the trial for Judaism of Catarina de Orta. Concentrating as much on the inquisitor’s\\n questions as on the answers offered by the defendant, I show here that impoliteness and self-politeness co-occur in interaction in\\n the Portuguese Inquisition courtroom discourse. On the one hand, the inquisitor makes abundant use of impoliteness strategies with\\n at least three main aims: to exert his power over the defendant, to trigger specific negative emotions, and to attack her face and\\n her credibility. On the other hand, the defendant’s answers display numerous features of self-politeness, aimed at saving her face\\n from the inquisitor’s attacks and accusations. It is precisely through the interplay of impoliteness and self-politeness that the\\n two competing narratives proposed by the accuser and the defendant are constructed and re-elaborated during every\\n interrogation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Historical Pragmatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Historical Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.22011.dia\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.22011.dia","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文探讨了葡萄牙宗教裁判所记录的卡塔里娜-德-奥尔塔(Catarina de Orta)犹太教审判中通过面子工作进行身份构建和协商的过程。我在本文中既关注宗教裁判官的提问,也关注被告的回答,从而表明在葡萄牙宗教裁判所的法庭话语中,无礼和自我无礼同时出现在互动中。一方面,宗教裁判官大量使用无礼策略,其主要目的至少有三个:对被告行使权力、引发特定的负面情绪、攻击被告的脸面和可信度。另一方面,被告的回答则表现出许多自我礼貌的特点,目的是在审问者的攻击和指责面前保全自己的面子。正是通过无礼和自我礼貌的相互作用,原告和被告提出的两种相互竞争的叙述才得以构建,并在每次审讯中得到重新阐述。
Negotiating converso identities in the inquisition courtroom
This paper explores the processes of identity construction and negotiation through face work in a Portuguese
Inquisition record, corresponding to the trial for Judaism of Catarina de Orta. Concentrating as much on the inquisitor’s
questions as on the answers offered by the defendant, I show here that impoliteness and self-politeness co-occur in interaction in
the Portuguese Inquisition courtroom discourse. On the one hand, the inquisitor makes abundant use of impoliteness strategies with
at least three main aims: to exert his power over the defendant, to trigger specific negative emotions, and to attack her face and
her credibility. On the other hand, the defendant’s answers display numerous features of self-politeness, aimed at saving her face
from the inquisitor’s attacks and accusations. It is precisely through the interplay of impoliteness and self-politeness that the
two competing narratives proposed by the accuser and the defendant are constructed and re-elaborated during every
interrogation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Historical Pragmatics provides an interdisciplinary forum for theoretical, empirical and methodological work at the intersection of pragmatics and historical linguistics. The editorial focus is on socio-historical and pragmatic aspects of historical texts in their sociocultural context of communication (e.g. conversational principles, politeness strategies, or speech acts) and on diachronic pragmatics as seen in linguistic processes such as grammaticalization or discoursization. Contributions draw on data from literary or non-literary sources and from any language. In addition to contributions with a strictly pragmatic or discourse analytical perspective, it also includes contributions with a more sociolinguistic or semantic approach.