文学证词的比较分析:大屠杀日记和回忆录教学

IF 0.6 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI:10.1111/tger.12275
Sarah Painitz
{"title":"文学证词的比较分析:大屠杀日记和回忆录教学","authors":"Sarah Painitz","doi":"10.1111/tger.12275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper provides concrete suggestions for teaching two Holocaust testimonies, Irene Hauser's diary and Ruth Klüger's memoir <i>Still Alive</i>. Hauser's and Klüger's texts effectively illustrate the differences between diaries and memoirs while recounting similar experiences. Such a comparative analysis, I argue, achieves two goals: First, by comparing two different types of autobiographical texts, students gain a deeper understanding and appreciation of the complexities, contradictions, and tensions inherent in autobiographical writing, ultimately encouraging students to become more accepting of ambiguity in their learning. Second, by focusing on Holocaust testimonies, students learn about persecution, injustice, and oppression, increasing their awareness of global issues, interculturalism, and social justice. The pedagogical approach and teaching suggestions outlined here are easily adaptable and can be applied to the teaching of autobiographical writing in other thematic contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":43693,"journal":{"name":"Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German","volume":"57 1","pages":"32-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative analysis of literary testimony: Teaching with Holocaust diaries and memoirs\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Painitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tger.12275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper provides concrete suggestions for teaching two Holocaust testimonies, Irene Hauser's diary and Ruth Klüger's memoir <i>Still Alive</i>. Hauser's and Klüger's texts effectively illustrate the differences between diaries and memoirs while recounting similar experiences. Such a comparative analysis, I argue, achieves two goals: First, by comparing two different types of autobiographical texts, students gain a deeper understanding and appreciation of the complexities, contradictions, and tensions inherent in autobiographical writing, ultimately encouraging students to become more accepting of ambiguity in their learning. Second, by focusing on Holocaust testimonies, students learn about persecution, injustice, and oppression, increasing their awareness of global issues, interculturalism, and social justice. The pedagogical approach and teaching suggestions outlined here are easily adaptable and can be applied to the teaching of autobiographical writing in other thematic contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"32-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tger.12275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tger.12275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文就艾琳-豪瑟(Irene Hauser)的日记和露丝-克吕格(Ruth Klüger)的回忆录《依然活着》(Still Alive)这两篇大屠杀证词的教学提出了具体建议。豪瑟和克吕格的文章在叙述相似经历的同时,有效地说明了日记和回忆录之间的差异。我认为,这种比较分析可以达到两个目的:首先,通过比较两种不同类型的自传体文本,学生可以更深入地理解和领会自传体写作中固有的复杂性、矛盾性和紧张性,最终鼓励学生在学习中更多地接受模糊性。其次,通过关注大屠杀见证,学生可以了解迫害、不公正和压迫,增强他们对全球问题、跨文化主义和社会正义的认识。这里概述的教学方法和教学建议很容易调整,可以应用于其他主题背景下的自传体写作教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparative analysis of literary testimony: Teaching with Holocaust diaries and memoirs

This paper provides concrete suggestions for teaching two Holocaust testimonies, Irene Hauser's diary and Ruth Klüger's memoir Still Alive. Hauser's and Klüger's texts effectively illustrate the differences between diaries and memoirs while recounting similar experiences. Such a comparative analysis, I argue, achieves two goals: First, by comparing two different types of autobiographical texts, students gain a deeper understanding and appreciation of the complexities, contradictions, and tensions inherent in autobiographical writing, ultimately encouraging students to become more accepting of ambiguity in their learning. Second, by focusing on Holocaust testimonies, students learn about persecution, injustice, and oppression, increasing their awareness of global issues, interculturalism, and social justice. The pedagogical approach and teaching suggestions outlined here are easily adaptable and can be applied to the teaching of autobiographical writing in other thematic contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German
Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Praxis articles and Forum on recruitment and retention Back in business! Professional German(s) at Rhodes College Uncertainty is in the Form: A functional, meaning-based approach to teaching ambiguity as author choice in Kafka's “Vor dem Gesetz” A collaboration between a high school and a college German program: Retention and articulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1