女佣回来了吗?贬低护理工作价值的漫长历史与福利的混合经济

Q3 Arts and Humanities Historein Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.12681/historein.34593
Nicole Kramer
{"title":"女佣回来了吗?贬低护理工作价值的漫长历史与福利的混合经济","authors":"Nicole Kramer","doi":"10.12681/historein.34593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For several years now, sociologists studying paid domestic care work have been arguing that the servant culture of the nineteenth century has returned. They focus on specific forms of care work: that done as informal or illegal employment, mostly carried out by migrants. To an historian, such a reference to the past is most intriguing. This article looks at the servant of the past to shed new light on the emergence of an informal labour market for care work. After outlining the arguments of sociologists about “the return of the maids”, it looks back at the history of servants. What was their role regarding long-term care for older disabled people? Furthermore, it sketches the changes regarding professional care at home and, finally, sheds some light on the emergence of a shadow market where migrants offer their services. In doing so, families should be brought into focus as agents of care within the mixed economy of welfare.","PeriodicalId":38128,"journal":{"name":"Historein","volume":"50 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Did the Maids Return? The Long History of Devaluing Care Work and the Mixed Economy of Welfare\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Kramer\",\"doi\":\"10.12681/historein.34593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For several years now, sociologists studying paid domestic care work have been arguing that the servant culture of the nineteenth century has returned. They focus on specific forms of care work: that done as informal or illegal employment, mostly carried out by migrants. To an historian, such a reference to the past is most intriguing. This article looks at the servant of the past to shed new light on the emergence of an informal labour market for care work. After outlining the arguments of sociologists about “the return of the maids”, it looks back at the history of servants. What was their role regarding long-term care for older disabled people? Furthermore, it sketches the changes regarding professional care at home and, finally, sheds some light on the emergence of a shadow market where migrants offer their services. In doing so, families should be brought into focus as agents of care within the mixed economy of welfare.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historein\",\"volume\":\"50 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historein\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12681/historein.34593\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historein","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12681/historein.34593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几年来,研究有偿家政护理工作的社会学家一直认为,十九世纪的仆人文化已经回归。他们关注的是特定形式的护理工作:非正式或非法的工作,大多由移民从事。对于历史学家来说,这种对过去的追溯是最耐人寻味的。本文从过去的仆人入手,为非正规护理工作劳动力市场的出现提供了新的视角。在概述了社会学家关于 "女仆回归 "的论点之后,文章回顾了仆人的历史。他们在为老年残疾人提供长期护理方面发挥了什么作用?此外,报告还概述了家庭专业护理方面的变化,最后对移民提供服务的影子市场的出现作了一些说明。在此过程中,家庭作为福利混合经济中的护理机构应受到关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Did the Maids Return? The Long History of Devaluing Care Work and the Mixed Economy of Welfare
For several years now, sociologists studying paid domestic care work have been arguing that the servant culture of the nineteenth century has returned. They focus on specific forms of care work: that done as informal or illegal employment, mostly carried out by migrants. To an historian, such a reference to the past is most intriguing. This article looks at the servant of the past to shed new light on the emergence of an informal labour market for care work. After outlining the arguments of sociologists about “the return of the maids”, it looks back at the history of servants. What was their role regarding long-term care for older disabled people? Furthermore, it sketches the changes regarding professional care at home and, finally, sheds some light on the emergence of a shadow market where migrants offer their services. In doing so, families should be brought into focus as agents of care within the mixed economy of welfare.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Historein
Historein Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Gender and Expertise in the Mixed Economy of Mental Welfare in Greece Vangelis Karamanolakis, Ανεπιθύμητο παρελθόν: Οι φάκελοι κοινωνικών φρονημάτων στον 20ό αιώνα και η καταστροφή τους [Unwanted past: The files on social beliefs in the 20th century and their destruction] Did the Maids Return? The Long History of Devaluing Care Work and the Mixed Economy of Welfare Ioannis K. Hassiotis, Ο Οδυσσέας στις θάλασσες του Νότου: Η ελληνική παρουσία στις υπερπόντιες κτήσεις της Ισπανίας (16ος–17ος αι.) [Odysseus in the southern seas: The Greek presence in the Spanish overseas territories (16th–17th century)] No Right to Family Life? Single Mothers and their Children in a “Mixed Economy of Welfare” in Switzerland, 1930s–1950s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1