评估白细胞酯酶和亚硝酸盐滴度计检测与常规尿液显微镜分析在检测尿路感染方面的作用

Agam Hans, Abhishek Yadav, Parneet Kaur, Archana Kumari
{"title":"评估白细胞酯酶和亚硝酸盐滴度计检测与常规尿液显微镜分析在检测尿路感染方面的作用","authors":"Agam Hans, Abhishek Yadav, Parneet Kaur, Archana Kumari","doi":"10.18231/j.ijpo.2024.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Urinary tract infection is a global health problem affecting all age groups. is the most common cause of UTI followed by , staphylococcus haemolyticus and enterococci etc. The gold standard for detecting an UTI is the presence of pathogen in urine along with clinical symptoms and pyuria. Nitrite (NIT) and leukocyte esterase (LE) tests are two important dip stick tests used for screening UTI. A total of 202 patients who presented with clinical symptoms of UTI from January 2023 to December 2023 were evaluated for urine routine and culture examination. LE and NIT dipstick tests were evaluated and change of colour was considered positive. Microscopic examination of urine was performed manually and urine culture with count of > 10 CFU/ml was considered positive. Statistical data was analysed using IBM SPSS v 29.0.2.0 (20) and Microsoft Excel. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were calculated for both tests.: LE had a sensitivity of 47.22% whereas NIT was much less sensitive (15.27%). Specificity of NIT (99.23%) was higher in comparison to LE (81.53%). NIT had overall better PPV and NPV (91.66%, and 67.89%) as compared to LE (58.62% and 73.61%). The accuracy of LE and NIT were 69.3% and 69.8% respectively. A positive correlation was also seen with increasing WBC count and positive urine culture.: Urine culture along with clinical and routine analysis is necessary for definitive diagnosis of UTI but importance of dipstick chemical examination should not be underestimated. LE and NIT have an additional benefit of quick results in comparison to culture which takes at least 24 hours.","PeriodicalId":486471,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pathology and Oncology","volume":"27 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Leukocyte esterase and Nitrite dipstick tests with routine urine microscopic analysis in detecting urinary tract infections\",\"authors\":\"Agam Hans, Abhishek Yadav, Parneet Kaur, Archana Kumari\",\"doi\":\"10.18231/j.ijpo.2024.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Urinary tract infection is a global health problem affecting all age groups. is the most common cause of UTI followed by , staphylococcus haemolyticus and enterococci etc. The gold standard for detecting an UTI is the presence of pathogen in urine along with clinical symptoms and pyuria. Nitrite (NIT) and leukocyte esterase (LE) tests are two important dip stick tests used for screening UTI. A total of 202 patients who presented with clinical symptoms of UTI from January 2023 to December 2023 were evaluated for urine routine and culture examination. LE and NIT dipstick tests were evaluated and change of colour was considered positive. Microscopic examination of urine was performed manually and urine culture with count of > 10 CFU/ml was considered positive. Statistical data was analysed using IBM SPSS v 29.0.2.0 (20) and Microsoft Excel. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were calculated for both tests.: LE had a sensitivity of 47.22% whereas NIT was much less sensitive (15.27%). Specificity of NIT (99.23%) was higher in comparison to LE (81.53%). NIT had overall better PPV and NPV (91.66%, and 67.89%) as compared to LE (58.62% and 73.61%). The accuracy of LE and NIT were 69.3% and 69.8% respectively. A positive correlation was also seen with increasing WBC count and positive urine culture.: Urine culture along with clinical and routine analysis is necessary for definitive diagnosis of UTI but importance of dipstick chemical examination should not be underestimated. LE and NIT have an additional benefit of quick results in comparison to culture which takes at least 24 hours.\",\"PeriodicalId\":486471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Pathology and Oncology\",\"volume\":\"27 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Pathology and Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijpo.2024.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pathology and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijpo.2024.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

:尿路感染是一个全球性的健康问题,影响着所有年龄段的人群。检测尿路感染的金标准是尿液中出现病原体以及临床症状和脓尿。亚硝酸盐(NIT)和白细胞酯酶(LE)检测是用于筛查尿毒症的两种重要浸渍棒检测方法。对 2023 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月期间出现尿毒症临床症状的 202 名患者进行了尿常规和培养检查。对 LE 和 NIT 量杯测试进行评估,变色即为阳性。人工对尿液进行显微镜检查,尿培养计数大于 10 CFU/ml 为阳性。统计数据使用 IBM SPSS v 29.0.2.0 (20) 和 Microsoft Excel 进行分析。计算了两种检测方法的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性:LE 的灵敏度为 47.22%,而 NIT 的灵敏度要低得多(15.27%)。NIT 的特异性(99.23%)高于 LE(81.53%)。与 LE(58.62% 和 73.61%)相比,NIT 的 PPV 和 NPV(91.66% 和 67.89%)总体更高。LE和NIT的准确率分别为69.3%和69.8%。白细胞计数增加与尿培养阳性也呈正相关:尿培养以及临床和常规分析是明确诊断尿毒症的必要条件,但也不应低估浸量尺化学检查的重要性。与至少需要 24 小时的尿培养相比,LE 和 NIT 的另一个优点是结果迅速。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Leukocyte esterase and Nitrite dipstick tests with routine urine microscopic analysis in detecting urinary tract infections
: Urinary tract infection is a global health problem affecting all age groups. is the most common cause of UTI followed by , staphylococcus haemolyticus and enterococci etc. The gold standard for detecting an UTI is the presence of pathogen in urine along with clinical symptoms and pyuria. Nitrite (NIT) and leukocyte esterase (LE) tests are two important dip stick tests used for screening UTI. A total of 202 patients who presented with clinical symptoms of UTI from January 2023 to December 2023 were evaluated for urine routine and culture examination. LE and NIT dipstick tests were evaluated and change of colour was considered positive. Microscopic examination of urine was performed manually and urine culture with count of > 10 CFU/ml was considered positive. Statistical data was analysed using IBM SPSS v 29.0.2.0 (20) and Microsoft Excel. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were calculated for both tests.: LE had a sensitivity of 47.22% whereas NIT was much less sensitive (15.27%). Specificity of NIT (99.23%) was higher in comparison to LE (81.53%). NIT had overall better PPV and NPV (91.66%, and 67.89%) as compared to LE (58.62% and 73.61%). The accuracy of LE and NIT were 69.3% and 69.8% respectively. A positive correlation was also seen with increasing WBC count and positive urine culture.: Urine culture along with clinical and routine analysis is necessary for definitive diagnosis of UTI but importance of dipstick chemical examination should not be underestimated. LE and NIT have an additional benefit of quick results in comparison to culture which takes at least 24 hours.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mucinous cystic neoplasm of the liver: A rare case report A primary leiomyosarcoma of small intestine: A rare case report Metastatic GIST with a TWIST of RCC: A case report Demographic profile of thyroid malignancies in a tertiary care centre in South India Primary ovarian squamous cell carcinoma arising from an epidermoid cyst of Ovary- A rare case report with review of literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1