{"title":"深不见底的非人亲情","authors":"Danny Steur","doi":"10.3828/extr.2024.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Afrofuturist mythology of Drexciya rewrites violent colonial histories of dispossession, imagining submarine utopias in which the descendants of enslaved Africans live outside colonial orders. With this submersion, the Drexciyan mythos offers creative visions of oceanic futures—the result of climate change. I therefore ask; what might be learned from Drexciyan relations to the Earth? I first probe Drexciyan–Earth relations through Rivers Solomon’s\n The Deep\n (2019), in which Drexciyans espouse a mode of stewardship over the Earth. Taking up a critical problematization of the possibility of relating to an inhuman Earth vastly greater than ourselves, I explore how\n The Deep\n navigates the incommensurability between inhuman nature and human/Drexciyan being. I argue that\n The Deep\n ’s Drexciyans are constituted across orders of in/non/human matter, an insight I carry over to Ellen Gallagher’s painting\n Bird in Hand\n (2006). There, I find a kinship relation with inhuman matter that accommodates the radical incommensurability of the Earth: I articulate this kinship as a transcorporeal mutuality of be(com)ing with the Earth. Whilst recognizing the asymmetry between their own existence and the Earth’s, Drexciyans insist on a difficult kinship with it. Such kinship relations critique Western practices of extractivism, and probe other praxes of inhabiting the Earth.\n","PeriodicalId":42992,"journal":{"name":"EXTRAPOLATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inhuman Kinship at Insensible Depths\",\"authors\":\"Danny Steur\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/extr.2024.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The Afrofuturist mythology of Drexciya rewrites violent colonial histories of dispossession, imagining submarine utopias in which the descendants of enslaved Africans live outside colonial orders. With this submersion, the Drexciyan mythos offers creative visions of oceanic futures—the result of climate change. I therefore ask; what might be learned from Drexciyan relations to the Earth? I first probe Drexciyan–Earth relations through Rivers Solomon’s\\n The Deep\\n (2019), in which Drexciyans espouse a mode of stewardship over the Earth. Taking up a critical problematization of the possibility of relating to an inhuman Earth vastly greater than ourselves, I explore how\\n The Deep\\n navigates the incommensurability between inhuman nature and human/Drexciyan being. I argue that\\n The Deep\\n ’s Drexciyans are constituted across orders of in/non/human matter, an insight I carry over to Ellen Gallagher’s painting\\n Bird in Hand\\n (2006). There, I find a kinship relation with inhuman matter that accommodates the radical incommensurability of the Earth: I articulate this kinship as a transcorporeal mutuality of be(com)ing with the Earth. Whilst recognizing the asymmetry between their own existence and the Earth’s, Drexciyans insist on a difficult kinship with it. Such kinship relations critique Western practices of extractivism, and probe other praxes of inhabiting the Earth.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":42992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EXTRAPOLATION\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EXTRAPOLATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/extr.2024.5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EXTRAPOLATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/extr.2024.5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Drexciya 的非洲未来主义神话改写了暴力剥夺的殖民历史,想象出被奴役非洲人的后裔在殖民秩序之外生活的海底乌托邦。通过这种沉潜,德雷克西娅神话提供了对海洋未来--气候变化的结果--的创造性想象。因此,我要问,从德雷克西扬人与地球的关系中可以学到什么?我首先通过里弗斯-所罗门(Rivers Solomon)的《深海》(The Deep,2019 年)来探究德雷克西扬人与地球的关系,在这部作品中,德雷克西扬人信奉一种管理地球的模式。我对《深渊》中非人类的自然与人类/德雷克西扬人之间的不可通约性进行了探讨。我认为,《深渊》中的德雷克西扬人是在非人类物质和非人类物质之间构成的,我将这一观点延伸到艾伦-加拉格尔(Ellen Gallagher)的画作《手中的鸟》(Bird in Hand,2006 年)中。在那里,我发现了一种与非人类物质的亲缘关系,这种关系容纳了地球的根本不可通约性:我将这种亲缘关系表述为与地球的超肉体互为性。德雷克西雅人认识到自身存在与地球存在之间的不对称,同时坚持与地球建立一种艰难的亲缘关系。这种亲缘关系批判了西方的采掘主义做法,并探究了居住在地球上的其他做法。
The Afrofuturist mythology of Drexciya rewrites violent colonial histories of dispossession, imagining submarine utopias in which the descendants of enslaved Africans live outside colonial orders. With this submersion, the Drexciyan mythos offers creative visions of oceanic futures—the result of climate change. I therefore ask; what might be learned from Drexciyan relations to the Earth? I first probe Drexciyan–Earth relations through Rivers Solomon’s
The Deep
(2019), in which Drexciyans espouse a mode of stewardship over the Earth. Taking up a critical problematization of the possibility of relating to an inhuman Earth vastly greater than ourselves, I explore how
The Deep
navigates the incommensurability between inhuman nature and human/Drexciyan being. I argue that
The Deep
’s Drexciyans are constituted across orders of in/non/human matter, an insight I carry over to Ellen Gallagher’s painting
Bird in Hand
(2006). There, I find a kinship relation with inhuman matter that accommodates the radical incommensurability of the Earth: I articulate this kinship as a transcorporeal mutuality of be(com)ing with the Earth. Whilst recognizing the asymmetry between their own existence and the Earth’s, Drexciyans insist on a difficult kinship with it. Such kinship relations critique Western practices of extractivism, and probe other praxes of inhabiting the Earth.