深不见底的非人亲情

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE EXTRAPOLATION Pub Date : 2024-04-14 DOI:10.3828/extr.2024.5
Danny Steur
{"title":"深不见底的非人亲情","authors":"Danny Steur","doi":"10.3828/extr.2024.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Afrofuturist mythology of Drexciya rewrites violent colonial histories of dispossession, imagining submarine utopias in which the descendants of enslaved Africans live outside colonial orders. With this submersion, the Drexciyan mythos offers creative visions of oceanic futures—the result of climate change. I therefore ask; what might be learned from Drexciyan relations to the Earth? I first probe Drexciyan–Earth relations through Rivers Solomon’s\n The Deep\n (2019), in which Drexciyans espouse a mode of stewardship over the Earth. Taking up a critical problematization of the possibility of relating to an inhuman Earth vastly greater than ourselves, I explore how\n The Deep\n navigates the incommensurability between inhuman nature and human/Drexciyan being. I argue that\n The Deep\n ’s Drexciyans are constituted across orders of in/non/human matter, an insight I carry over to Ellen Gallagher’s painting\n Bird in Hand\n (2006). There, I find a kinship relation with inhuman matter that accommodates the radical incommensurability of the Earth: I articulate this kinship as a transcorporeal mutuality of be(com)ing with the Earth. Whilst recognizing the asymmetry between their own existence and the Earth’s, Drexciyans insist on a difficult kinship with it. Such kinship relations critique Western practices of extractivism, and probe other praxes of inhabiting the Earth.\n","PeriodicalId":42992,"journal":{"name":"EXTRAPOLATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inhuman Kinship at Insensible Depths\",\"authors\":\"Danny Steur\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/extr.2024.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The Afrofuturist mythology of Drexciya rewrites violent colonial histories of dispossession, imagining submarine utopias in which the descendants of enslaved Africans live outside colonial orders. With this submersion, the Drexciyan mythos offers creative visions of oceanic futures—the result of climate change. I therefore ask; what might be learned from Drexciyan relations to the Earth? I first probe Drexciyan–Earth relations through Rivers Solomon’s\\n The Deep\\n (2019), in which Drexciyans espouse a mode of stewardship over the Earth. Taking up a critical problematization of the possibility of relating to an inhuman Earth vastly greater than ourselves, I explore how\\n The Deep\\n navigates the incommensurability between inhuman nature and human/Drexciyan being. I argue that\\n The Deep\\n ’s Drexciyans are constituted across orders of in/non/human matter, an insight I carry over to Ellen Gallagher’s painting\\n Bird in Hand\\n (2006). There, I find a kinship relation with inhuman matter that accommodates the radical incommensurability of the Earth: I articulate this kinship as a transcorporeal mutuality of be(com)ing with the Earth. Whilst recognizing the asymmetry between their own existence and the Earth’s, Drexciyans insist on a difficult kinship with it. Such kinship relations critique Western practices of extractivism, and probe other praxes of inhabiting the Earth.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":42992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EXTRAPOLATION\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EXTRAPOLATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/extr.2024.5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EXTRAPOLATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/extr.2024.5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Drexciya 的非洲未来主义神话改写了暴力剥夺的殖民历史,想象出被奴役非洲人的后裔在殖民秩序之外生活的海底乌托邦。通过这种沉潜,德雷克西娅神话提供了对海洋未来--气候变化的结果--的创造性想象。因此,我要问,从德雷克西扬人与地球的关系中可以学到什么?我首先通过里弗斯-所罗门(Rivers Solomon)的《深海》(The Deep,2019 年)来探究德雷克西扬人与地球的关系,在这部作品中,德雷克西扬人信奉一种管理地球的模式。我对《深渊》中非人类的自然与人类/德雷克西扬人之间的不可通约性进行了探讨。我认为,《深渊》中的德雷克西扬人是在非人类物质和非人类物质之间构成的,我将这一观点延伸到艾伦-加拉格尔(Ellen Gallagher)的画作《手中的鸟》(Bird in Hand,2006 年)中。在那里,我发现了一种与非人类物质的亲缘关系,这种关系容纳了地球的根本不可通约性:我将这种亲缘关系表述为与地球的超肉体互为性。德雷克西雅人认识到自身存在与地球存在之间的不对称,同时坚持与地球建立一种艰难的亲缘关系。这种亲缘关系批判了西方的采掘主义做法,并探究了居住在地球上的其他做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inhuman Kinship at Insensible Depths
The Afrofuturist mythology of Drexciya rewrites violent colonial histories of dispossession, imagining submarine utopias in which the descendants of enslaved Africans live outside colonial orders. With this submersion, the Drexciyan mythos offers creative visions of oceanic futures—the result of climate change. I therefore ask; what might be learned from Drexciyan relations to the Earth? I first probe Drexciyan–Earth relations through Rivers Solomon’s The Deep (2019), in which Drexciyans espouse a mode of stewardship over the Earth. Taking up a critical problematization of the possibility of relating to an inhuman Earth vastly greater than ourselves, I explore how The Deep navigates the incommensurability between inhuman nature and human/Drexciyan being. I argue that The Deep ’s Drexciyans are constituted across orders of in/non/human matter, an insight I carry over to Ellen Gallagher’s painting Bird in Hand (2006). There, I find a kinship relation with inhuman matter that accommodates the radical incommensurability of the Earth: I articulate this kinship as a transcorporeal mutuality of be(com)ing with the Earth. Whilst recognizing the asymmetry between their own existence and the Earth’s, Drexciyans insist on a difficult kinship with it. Such kinship relations critique Western practices of extractivism, and probe other praxes of inhabiting the Earth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EXTRAPOLATION
EXTRAPOLATION LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
The Programming of Free Will in Anthony Burgess’s A Clockwork Orange Critiques of Domesticity in Ray Bradbury’s Cold War Fiction Nightmare Angels and Dreams of Flight: Transgressive Transcendence in J. G. Ballard’s Crash and The Unlimited Dream Compan y Nnedi Okorafor: Noor as Noir, Cyborg Hybridity, Identity, and Disability Death, History, and the Time Loop: The Subject/Object Relation in Vandana Singh’s “Somadeva: A Sky River Sutra”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1