牵引驱动装置与发动机轴向支撑悬挂装置和框架支撑悬挂装置的比较

A. Pugachev, V. Vorob'ev, O. Izmerov, E. Nikolaev
{"title":"牵引驱动装置与发动机轴向支撑悬挂装置和框架支撑悬挂装置的比较","authors":"A. Pugachev, V. Vorob'ev, O. Izmerov, E. Nikolaev","doi":"10.30987/2782-5957-2024-4-13-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of finding criteria for choosing between axial support and frame support drives for locomotives in the conditions of import substitution is considered. The changes in the criteria for choosing a traction drive design depending on the changes in requirements for locomotives are analyzed. The types of drives are compared according to their technological simplicity, weight and size indicators, the effect on the coupling properties of the locomotive and the damage to the track structure, taking into account the production of new traction drive designs of an integrated type with collector-free traction electric motors having an increased rotation frequency. It was found that for locomotives with collector traction motors, it is advisable to use a frame support drive with an axial gearbox or a hollow driveshaft, and when using collector-free traction motors , the axial support traction drive of an integrated layout on freight locomotives with 1250 mm wheel diameter to improve coupling properties by 12...15%, it is advisable to replace it with the one proposed by the authors, which is an aggregate-type drive with an elastic link in the shaft lines, or with frame support drives with an axial gearbox, and with a wheel diameter of 1050 mm – frame support drives with a hollow shaft on the axis. An application for a patent has been submitted for the proposed solutions.","PeriodicalId":289189,"journal":{"name":"Transport engineering","volume":"8 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARISON OF TRACTION DRIVES WITH AXIAL SUPPORT AND FRAME SUPPORT SUSPENSION OF THE ENGINE\",\"authors\":\"A. Pugachev, V. Vorob'ev, O. Izmerov, E. Nikolaev\",\"doi\":\"10.30987/2782-5957-2024-4-13-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problem of finding criteria for choosing between axial support and frame support drives for locomotives in the conditions of import substitution is considered. The changes in the criteria for choosing a traction drive design depending on the changes in requirements for locomotives are analyzed. The types of drives are compared according to their technological simplicity, weight and size indicators, the effect on the coupling properties of the locomotive and the damage to the track structure, taking into account the production of new traction drive designs of an integrated type with collector-free traction electric motors having an increased rotation frequency. It was found that for locomotives with collector traction motors, it is advisable to use a frame support drive with an axial gearbox or a hollow driveshaft, and when using collector-free traction motors , the axial support traction drive of an integrated layout on freight locomotives with 1250 mm wheel diameter to improve coupling properties by 12...15%, it is advisable to replace it with the one proposed by the authors, which is an aggregate-type drive with an elastic link in the shaft lines, or with frame support drives with an axial gearbox, and with a wheel diameter of 1050 mm – frame support drives with a hollow shaft on the axis. An application for a patent has been submitted for the proposed solutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":289189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transport engineering\",\"volume\":\"8 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transport engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30987/2782-5957-2024-4-13-25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30987/2782-5957-2024-4-13-25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究了在进口替代的条件下,机车轴向支撑和框架支撑驱动之间的选择标准问题。分析了根据机车要求的变化选择牵引驱动设计标准的变化。根据其技术简易性、重量和尺寸指标、对机车耦合性能的影响以及对轨道结构的损坏程度,对各种类型的驱动装置进行了比较,同时考虑到了新型牵引驱动装置设计的生产情况,该设计集成了旋转频率更高的无集电极牵引电动机。研究发现,对于使用集电式牵引电机的机车,最好使用带有轴向齿轮箱或空心传动轴的框架支撑驱动装置,而当使用无集电式牵引电机时,在车轮直径为 1250 毫米的货运机车上使用一体化布局的轴向支撑牵引驱动装置可将耦合性能提高 12..15%,因此最好用作者提出的方法代替,即在轴线上安装弹性连接的集束式驱动装置,或安装轴向齿轮箱的框架支撑驱动装置,轮径为 1050 毫米的机车--轴上安装空心轴的框架支撑驱动装置。已就建议的解决方案提交了专利申请。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COMPARISON OF TRACTION DRIVES WITH AXIAL SUPPORT AND FRAME SUPPORT SUSPENSION OF THE ENGINE
The problem of finding criteria for choosing between axial support and frame support drives for locomotives in the conditions of import substitution is considered. The changes in the criteria for choosing a traction drive design depending on the changes in requirements for locomotives are analyzed. The types of drives are compared according to their technological simplicity, weight and size indicators, the effect on the coupling properties of the locomotive and the damage to the track structure, taking into account the production of new traction drive designs of an integrated type with collector-free traction electric motors having an increased rotation frequency. It was found that for locomotives with collector traction motors, it is advisable to use a frame support drive with an axial gearbox or a hollow driveshaft, and when using collector-free traction motors , the axial support traction drive of an integrated layout on freight locomotives with 1250 mm wheel diameter to improve coupling properties by 12...15%, it is advisable to replace it with the one proposed by the authors, which is an aggregate-type drive with an elastic link in the shaft lines, or with frame support drives with an axial gearbox, and with a wheel diameter of 1050 mm – frame support drives with a hollow shaft on the axis. An application for a patent has been submitted for the proposed solutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DEVELOPMENT OF INFORMATIVE PARAMETERS TO DIAGNOSE LASER HARDENING OF TYRES STRUCTURAL SYNTHESIS OF ASSUR EIGHT-BAR CLOSED KINEMATIC CHAINS OF THE FIRST FAMILY MOVABLE LINKS OF THE FOURTH TYPE DETERMINATION OF THE ELEMENTS RESOURCE OF THE CONTACT PAIR ACCORDING TO THEIR WORKING CONDITION THE FRAME STRENGTH FOR THE POWER PLANT AND HYDRAULIC TRANSMISSION OF DR1B DIESEL TRAIN TYPE WEAR RESISTANCE OF COMPOSITE BORATED LAYERS OBTAINED BY HIGH FREQUENCY CURRENT (HFC) HEATING FOR HARDENING ROLLING STOCK PARTS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1